So we stand more or less on our own when trying to make sense of a specifically transcendental way of argumentation. Fortunately we are not all that alone, since independently of a direct Kantian influence the problem of transcendental arguments has stimulated a considerable debate among analytical philosophers. And we still have Kant’s own text. We shall start, therefore, by reminding ourselves of this debate and then go back to Kant. We shall deliberately not proceed the other way round in (...) order to avoid as much as possible what one may call a Kantian bias. The representatives chosen for analytical philosophy are Wittgenstein, Quine, and Strawson. We shall then consider the Kantian account of the meaning of the term "transcendental". After this preparation we are in a position to examine the claim of a ‘transcendental deduction,’ which is one of the most controversial issues arising from the Critique of Pure Reason. (shrink)

Más allá de la presentación doxográfica del tan estudiado "tránsito de Kant a Hegel", lo que se discute aquí es el proceso del pensamiento que tiene lugar en ese tránsito. El hilo conductor de la supuesta superación de la problemática metafísica se transforma en un proceso de laespeculación misma, en el que la transparencia del trabajo crítico de la reflexión del sistema hegeliano incorpora igualmente a la historia.