1.  10
    An Inquiry Into Pseudo‐Legitimations: A Framework to Investigate the Clash of Managerial Legitimations and Employees' Unfairness Claims.Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 28 (1):129-138.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  17
    The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations.Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 167 (3):495-512.
    This paper offers a novel situational approach to study organizational justice in which the proposed unit of analysis is managerial behavior manifested in argumentation rather than employee justice perceptions. The currently dominant theoretical framework in justice research, which is built on justice perceptions, neglects the unique features of organizational order and vulnerability of procedural justice perceptions. As the procedural justice concept belongs chiefly to a spontaneous market order under which the rule of law is made possible, it is inappropriate to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  7
    Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns.Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (3):519-535.
    By synthesizing the argumentation theory of new rhetoric with research on heuristics and motivated reasoning, we develop a conceptual view of argumentation based on reasoning motivations that sheds new light on the morality of decision-making. Accordingly, we propose that reasoning in eristic argumentation is motivated by psychological or material gains that do not depend on resolving the problem in question truthfully. Contrary to heuristic argumentation, in which disputants genuinely argue to reach a practically rational solution, eristic argumentation aims to defeat (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation