22 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Rogeer Hoedemaekers [17]R. Hoedemaekers [5]
  1.  26
    Solidarity and justice as guiding principles in genomic research.Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (6):342–350.
    ABSTRACT In genomic research the ideal standard of free, informed, prior and explicit consent is sometimes difficult to apply. This has raised concern that important genomic research will be restricted. Different consent procedures have therefore been proposed. This paper explicitly examines the question how, in genomic research, the principles of solidarity and justice can be used to justify forms of diminished individual control over personal data and bio‐samples. After a discussion of the notions of solidarity and justice and how they (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  2.  63
    Geneticization: The Cyprus Paradigm.Henk ten Have & Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):274-287.
    Geneticization is a broad term referring to several related processes such as a spreading tendency to use a genetic model of disease explanation, a growing influence of genetics in medical practice, and the slow changing of individual and societal attitudes towards reproduction, prevention and control of disease. These processes can be demonstrated in medical literature on preventive genetic screening and counselling programs for β-thalassaemia in Cyprus, the United Kingdom and Canada. The preventive possibilities of the new genetic and diagnostic technologies (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3.  74
    Justice and Solidarity in Priority Setting in Health Care.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):325-343.
    During the last decade a “technical” approach has become increasingly influential in health care priority setting. The various country reports illustrate, however, that non-technical considerations cannot be avoided. As they often remain implicit in health care package decisions, this paper aims to make these normative judgements an explicit part of the procedure. More specifically, it aims to integrate different models of distributive justice as well as the principle of solidarity in four different phases of a decision-making procedure, and to identify (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  4.  43
    Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):309-323.
    In decisions about inclusion (or exclusion) of health care services in the benefit package, different interpretations of notions like health, health risk, disease, quality of life or necessary care often remain implicit. Yet they can lead to different benefit package decisions. After a brief discussion of these concepts in definitions of the goals of medicine, the various value-judgements implicit in interpretations of key notions in health care are analysed and conclusions are drawn with regard to the composition of decision making (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  5.  30
    Commercialisation of genetic diagnostic services.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Henk ten Have - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (3):217-224.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  88
    Does an appeal to the common good justify individual sacrifices for genomic research?Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):415-431.
    In genomic research the ideal standard of free, informed, prior, and explicit consent is believed to restrict important research studies. For certain types of genomic research other forms of consent are therefore proposed which are ethically justified by an appeal to the common good. This notion is often used in a general sense and this forms a weak basis for the use of weaker forms of consent. Here we examine how the notion of the common good can be related to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  26
    Problematic Notions in Dutch Health Care Package Decisions.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wija Oortwijn - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):287-294.
    This paper discusses the problematic and sometimes implicit nature of some central notions and criteria used in debates about inclusion (or exclusion) of health care services in the health care benefit package. An analysis of discussions about four health care services—lungtransplantation, statins, (sildenafil (viagra) and rivastigmine—illustrates a case-by-case approach and inconsistent use of criteria, which present a challenge to develop a decision-making procedure in which important criteria or central notions can be discussed explicitly.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  8.  34
    Teaching medical students about fair distribution of healthcare resources.C. Leget & R. Hoedemaekers - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):737-741.
    Healthcare package decisions are complex. Different judgements about effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and disease burden influence the decision-making process. Moreover, different concepts of justice generate different ideas about fair distribution of healthcare resources. This paper presents a decision model that is used in medical school in order to familiarise medical students with the different concepts of justice and the ethical dimension of making concrete choices. The model is based on the four-stage decision model developed in the Netherlands by the Dunning Committee and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  41
    The complexities of ethical evaluation of genomics research.R. Hoedemaekers, B. Gordijn, Y. Hekster & F. Van Agt - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (1):18-36.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  34
    Commercialization, patents and moral assessment of biotechnology products.Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):273 – 284.
    The biotechnology patent debates have revealed deep moral concerns about basic genetics research, RD and specific biotechnological products, concerns that are seldom taken into consideration in Technology Assessment. In this paper important moral concerns are examined which appear at the various stages of development of a specific genetic product: a predictive genetic test. The purpose is to illustrate the need for a more contextual approach in technology assessment, which integrates the various forms of interaction between bio-technology and society or societal (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11.  62
    Genetic screening: a comparative analysis of three recent reports.R. Hoedemaekers, H. ten Have & R. Chadwick - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):135-141.
    Three recent reports on genetic screening published in the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands are discussed. Comparison of the Dutch report with the Danish and the Nuffield reports reveals that the Dutch report focuses on the aim of enlarging the scope for action, emphasising protection of autonomy and self-determination of the screenee more than the other two reports. The three reports have in common that the main concern is with concrete issue such as stigmatisation, discrimination, protection of the private (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12.  59
    Is there a unique moral status of human DNA that prevents patenting?Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):359-386.
    : The gene patenting debate, which proved to be a focal point for divergent moral concerns about recent developments in genome research and biotechnology, has revealed that the moral status of DNA is not clear. One of the arguments used to stop undesirable developments was that DNA possesses a unique status, which renders it unfit for patenting. This paper investigates the allegedly unique (moral) status of genetic material and the information it holds from different perspectives. Several properties of DNA prove (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  81
    The Concept of Abnormality in Medical Genetics.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Henk ten Have - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (6):537-561.
    This paper explores usage of the concept ofabnormality in medical genetics and proposesdirectives for more careful usage of this concept.The conceptual difficulties are first explored, thena model is developed to assess actual usage, followedby analysis of a sample of genetic textbooks andgenetics literature. It appears that fact andvaluation are often intermingled, that referencestandards used to define 'genetic abnormalities' areoften not clear and that the concept of abnormality isoften used independent of the degree of certainty withwhich the altered genetype develops into (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  13
    Genetic screening: a comparative analysis of three recent reports.R. Hoedemaekers, H. Have & R. Chadwick - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):135-141.
  15.  33
    Euroscreen 2: Towards community policy on insurance, commercialization and public awareness.Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Jrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):263-272.
    The project Euroscreen 2 has examined genetic screening and testing with particular reference to implications for insurance, commercialization through marketing of genetic tests direct to the public, and issues surrounding raising public awareness of these and other developments in genetics, including the practical experiment of a Gene Shop. This paper provides a snapshot of the three year project. The study groups work included monitoring developments in different European countries and exploring possibilities for regulation in insurance and commercialization together with public (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  17
    The Advent of the 'Personal Pill'.Rogeer Hoedemaekers, David Badcott & Bert Gordijn - 2001 - Ethical Perspectives 8 (1):50-58.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  61
    The ontological status of human DNA: Is it not first and foremost a biological ``file self''?Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):377-395.
    This paper investigates which of the variouslegal notions proposed for human DNA is themost appropriate from an ontological viewpoint – unique legal status, private property, commonproperty, person, or information. The focus is onthe difficulties that private property, commonproperty and person present. By usingHarré''s notion of ``file-self'''' we arguethat, ontologically, the most appropriate legalnotion to be applied is information. This hasconsequences for storage, control and use ofgenetic information as well as identifiablehuman body material.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  17
    Commercial predictive testing: the desirability of one overseeing body.R. Hoedemaekers - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):282-286.
    In Europe a process of harmonisation of standards and regulations on genetic testing has started. Public discussion and consultation are recommended, but it is not clear in every European country how the decision making process as regards the further introduction of genetic testing services should be formed. In this paper the usefulness and importance of an overseeing body for genetic screening and testing is founded on four lines of reasoning: analysis of the role of value judgments in the use of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. Euroscreen 2: Zu einer gemeinsamen Versicherungs- und Kommerzialisierungspolitik und zu einer Politik des oeffentlichen Bewusstseins ueber Genetik.Urban Wiesing, Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Joergen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan & Darren Shickle - 2000 - Ethik in der Medizin 12 (4):269-273.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  23
    Introduction: Towards Better Integration of Normative Judgements in Health Care Package Decisions. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):275-278.
  21.  39
    Euroscreen 2: Zu einer gemeinsamen Versicherungs- und Kommerzialisierungspolitik und zu einer Politik des öffentlichen Bewusstseins über Genetik. [REVIEW]Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Jørgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing - 2000 - Ethik in der Medizin 12 (4):269-273.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  31
    Human gene patents: Core issues in a multi-layered debate. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.
    After ten years of debate Directive 98/44/EG on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions was adopted in 1998. This directive takes decisions on some controversial bioethical and legal issues and offers the European biotech industries more space to develop their inventions, but leaves a number of philosophical and moral issues unresolved. This paper distinguishes between different layers in the debate and maps its modes of argumentation. Major philosophical, ethical and conceptual issues are located. It is argued that further analysis of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation