How can the friction between genesis and validity be understood? Is it possible to »dissolve« it? This paper argues that the genesis/validity-problem reflects the fundamental epistemological differences between History and Philosophy, and it takes Michel Foucault’s »Archeology« as a model case for this problem. Since Foucault’s »archaeological« methodology, i.e. his discourse analysis, is deeply affected by these tensions, I will show, firstly, that the epistemological model for Foucault’s anti-hermeneutical and genealogical approach was rooted not in philosophy, but in medicine, especially (...) in anatomy. Secondly, I will argue that the »paradoxical« position of discourse analysis, in Foucault’s eyes, is necessarily a political one – i.e. as a position within political struggles. (shrink)

Buchkritik über: Michel Foucault: Geschichte der Gouvernementalität. Herausgegeben von Michel Sennelart. 2 Bände, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt/M. 2004.Bd. I: Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Vorlesung am Collège de France 1977–1978. Aus dem Französischen von Claudia Brede-Konersmann und Jürgen Schröder, 600 S. .Bd. II: Die Geburt der Biopolitik. Vorlesung am Collège de France 1978–1979. Aus dem Französischen von Jürgen Schröder, 517 S.