43 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Philip M. Merikle [40]Phil Merikle [2]Philip Merikle [1]
  1.  34
    Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness.Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle - 1988 - Perception and Psychophysics 44:563-575.
  2. Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.J. Cheesman & Philip M. Merikle - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Psychology 40:343-67.
  3. Priming with and without awareness.J. Cheesman & Philip M. Merikle - 1984 - Perception and Psychophysics 36:387-95.
  4. Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology.Philip M. Merikle & Daniel Smilek - 2001 - Cognition 79 (1):115-34.
  5. Comparing direct (explicit) to indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory.Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold - 1991 - Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory And Cognition 17 (2):224-233.
  6.  50
    On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes.Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle - 1990 - Mind and Language 5 (1):9-28.
  7.  61
    Consciousness is a “subjective” state.Philip M. Merikle & Jim Cheesman - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):42-42.
  8. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness.Philip M. Merikle & Steve Joordens - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):219-36.
    Do studies of perception without awareness and studies of perception without attention address a similar underlying concept of awareness? To answer this question, we compared qualitative differences in performance across variations in stimulus quality with qualitative differences in performance across variations in the direction of attention . The qualitative differences were based on three different phenomena: Stroop priming, false recognition, and exclusion failure. In all cases, variations in stimulus quality and variations in the direction of attention led to parallel findings. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  9.  29
    Unconscious perception revisited.Philip M. Merikle - 1982 - Perception and Psychophysics 31:298-301.
  10.  37
    Perception without awareness: Critical issues.Philip M. Merikle - 1992 - American Psychologist 47:792-5.
  11.  50
    Toward a definition of awareness.Philip M. Merikle - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (5):449-50.
  12.  64
    Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.Philip M. Merikle, Steve Joordens & Jennifer A. Stolz - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4):422-39.
    As an alternative to establishing awareness thresholds, stimulus contexts in which there were either greater conscious or greater unconscious influences were defined on the basis of performance on an exclusion task. Target words were presented for brief durations and each target word was followed immediately by its three-letter stem. Subjects were instructed to complete each stem with any word other than the target word. With this task, failures to exclude target words indicate greater unconscious influences, whereas successful exclusion indicates greater (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  13.  95
    Five plus two equals yellow: Mental arithmetic in people with synaesthesia is not coloured by visual experience.M. Dixon, Daniel Smilek, C. Cudahy & Philip M. Merikle - 2000 - Nature 406.
  14.  23
    Spatial selectivity in vision: Field size depends upon noise size.Philip M. Merikle & Nancy J. Gorewich - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (5):343-346.
  15. Psychological investigations of unconscious perception.Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (1):5-18.
    This paper reviews the history of psychological investigations of unconscious perception and summarizes the current status of experimental research in this area of investigation. The research findings described in the paper illustrate how it is possible to distinguish experimentally between conscious and unconscious perception. The most successful experimental strategy has been to show that a stimulus can have qualitatively different consequences on cognitive and affective reactions depending on whether it was consciously or unconsciously perceived. In addition, recent studies of patients (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  16.  59
    Does unattended information facilitate change detection?Daniel Smilek, Jonathan Eastwood & Philip M. Merikle - 2000 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 26:480-487.
  17. Conscious and unconscious processes: The effects of motivation.Troy A. W. Visser & Philip M. Merikle - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):94-113.
    The process-dissociation procedure has been used in a variety of experimental contexts to assess the contributions of conscious and unconscious processes to task performance. To evaluate whether motivation affects estimates of conscious and unconscious processes, participants were given incentives to follow inclusion and exclusion instructions in a perception task and a memory task. Relative to a control condition in which no performance incentives were given, the results for the perception task indicated that incentives increased the participants' ability to exclude previously (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  18.  44
    Ovals of time: Time-space associations in synaesthesia.Daniel Smilek, Alicia Callejas, Mike J. Dixon & Philip M. Merikle - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):507-519.
    We examine a condition in which units of time, such as months of the year, are associated with specific locations in space. For individuals with this time-space synaesthesia, contiguous time units such as months are spatially linked forming idiosyncratically shaped patterns such as ovals, oblongs or circles. For some individuals, each time unit appears in a highly specific colour. For instance, one of the synaesthetes we studied experienced December as a red area located at arms length to the left of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  19.  13
    Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.Bruce Milliken, Steve Joordens, Philip M. Merikle & Adriane E. Seiffert - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):203-229.
  20.  16
    Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences.Steve Joordens & Philip M. Merikle - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 122 (4):462-67.
  21. Conscious vs. unconscious perception.Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman - 2000 - In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences: 2nd Edition. MIT Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  22.  16
    Perception below the Objective Threshold?Mark Van Selst & Philip M. Merikle - 1993 - Consciousness and Cognition 2 (3):194-203.
    The experiments reported by Snodgrass, Shevrin, and Kopka appear to demonstrate that words are perceived even when overall forced-choice discrimination performance does not deviate from chance. We replicated their critical finding in two separate experiments; our results indicated that the subjects′ preferences for one of the two strategy conditions predicted significant deviations from chance performance in the pop condition, even though the overall performance in this condition did not differ from chance. In addition, we found that task preference had no (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  23. Measuring unconscious perceptual processes.Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold - 1992 - In R.F. Bornstein & T.S. Pittman (eds.), Perception Without Awareness. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 55-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  24.  65
    Memory for unconsciously perceived events: Evidence from anesthetized patients.Philip M. Merikle & Meredyth Daneman - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (4):525-541.
    Studies investigating memory for events during anesthesia show a confusing pattern of positive and negative results. To establish whether there are any consistent patterns of findings across studies, we conducted a meta-analysis of the data from 2517 patients in 44 studies. The meta-analysis included two measures of the effects of positive suggestions on postoperative recovery: the duration of postoperative hospitalization and the amount of morphine administered via patient-controlled anesthesia, as well as two measures of memory for specific information presented during (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  25.  18
    Recognition and lexical decision without detection: Unconscious perception?Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold - 1990 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:574-83.
  26. Preconscious processing.Phil Merikle - 2007 - In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell.
  27. Priming in the attentional blink: Perception without awareness?Troy A. W. Visser, Philip M. Merikle & Vincent Di Lollo - 2005 - Visual Cognition 12 (7):1362-1372.
  28. Measuring unconscious processes.Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold - 1992 - In Robert F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (eds.), Perception Without Awareness. Guilford.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  29. Association for the Scientific study of Consciousness (ASSC) The ASSC William James Prize for Contributions to the Study of Consciousness.Ned Block, Christof Koch & Phil Merikle - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13:211.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  24
    Unconscious cognition in the context of general anesthesia.Glenys Caseley-Rondi, Philip M. Merikle & Kenneth S. Bowers - 1994 - Consciousness and Cognition 3 (2):166-95.
    In the present article we consider general anesthesia as a means of exploring questions regarding unconscious influence. The primary questions addressed in the research are whether surgical patients who are under adequate general anesthesia unconsciously perceive auditory information and whether they can benefit from such information. In addition, we consider the relevance of individual hypnotic ability for perceptual processing in this context. Ninety-six adult patients, undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy, were randomly allocated to one of four tape-recorded conditions: therapeutic suggestions, melodies, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  17
    On the Futility of Attempting to Demonstrate Null Awareness.Philip M. Merikle - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):412-412.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32. What Does Implicit Cognition Tell Us About Consciousness?Owen Flanagan Churchland, John Gabrieli, Melvyn Goodale, Anthony Greenwald, Valerie Hardcastle, Larry Jacoby, Christof Koch, Philip Merikle, David Milner & Daniel Schacter - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6:148.
  33.  20
    Response processes and semantic-context effects.Mark Dallas & Philip M. Merikle - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (6):441-444.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  30
    Conscious and unconscious processes: Same or different?Philip M. Merikle & Jim Cheesman - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):547-548.
  35. Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold - unknown
    There are hundreds of indications leading us to conclude that at every moment there is in us an infinity of perceptions, unaccompanied by awareness or reflection; that is, of alterations in the soul itself, of which we are unaware because the impressions are either too minute or too numerous, or else too unvarying, so that they are not sufficiently distinctive on their own. But when they are combined with others they do nevertheless have their effect and make themselves felt, at (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Memory for events during anesthesia: A meta-analysis.Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman - 1996 - In B. Bonke, J. G. Bovill & N. Moerman (eds.), Memory and Awareness in Anesthesia III. Van Gorcum.
  37. N early 300 years ago Leibniz, in his.Philip M. Merikle - unknown
    moment there is in us an infinity of perceptions, unaccompanied by awareness or reflection; that is, of alterations in the soul itself, of which we are unaware because the impressions are either too minute or too numerous, or else too unvarying, so that they are not sufficiently distinctive on their own.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. P€1`C€pt1OI1 w1tho\1t &W3.I`€1'1€SS''.Philip M. Merikle - unknown
    Many studies directed at demonstrating perception without awareness have relied on the dissociation paradigm. Although the logic underlying this paradigm is relatively straightforward, definitive results have been elusive in the absence of any general consensus as to what constitutes an adequate measure of awareness. We propose an alternative approach that involves comparisons of the relative sensitivity of comparable direct and indirect indexes of perception. The only assumption required by the proposed approach is that the sensitivity of direct discriminations to relevant (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  24
    Selective backward masking with an unpredictable mask.Philip M. Merikle - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):589.
  40. UHCOHSCIOUS processes.Philip M. Merikle - unknown
    The idea that cognitive processes can be meaningfully classified as conscious or unconscious has a long history in philosophy and psychology. However, even though many experimental reports during the past 100 years claim to demonstrate perception, Ieaming, or memory without conscious awareness, the distinction between conscious and unconscious ’ processes remains highly controversial. For example, the same empirical findings that Holender 1986 concludes provide little or no evidence for unconscious perception are considered by other reviewers as conclusive and overwhelming documentation (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  16
    Unit size and interpolated-task difficulty as determinants of short-term retention.Philip M. Merikle - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):370.
  42.  37
    Corrigendum to “Ovals of time: Time–space associations in synaesthesia” [Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2008) 507–519].Daniel Smilek, Alicia Callejas, Mike J. Dixon & Philip M. Merikle - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):504-504.
    The illustration of a time–space shown in Fig. 1A of the paper was based on an illustration by Carol Steen entitled “PD’s Time Space” that appeared in Duffy. Blue cats and chartreuse kittens: How synesthetes color their worlds. New York: Henry Holt and Company).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  34
    Conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Temporal dynamics.J. A. Stolz & Philip M. Merikle - 2000 - Memory 8 (5):333-343.
    Changes in the conscious and unconscious influences of memory over time were assessed in two experiments by using a variant of the process-dissociation procedure. In both experiments, performance on a stem-completion task was measured under both inclusion and exclusion instructions. Across the two experiments, there were four different retention intervals: 2 minutes, 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months. The results indicated that conscious influences decreased systematically across retention interval. In contrast, unconscious influences of memory in the absence of conscious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark