Order:
Disambiguations
Neal E. Kroll [9]Neal E. A. Kroll [6]Neal Ea Kroll [1]Nea Kroll [1]
  1.  18
    Visual imagery mnemonics: Common vs. bizarre mental images.Paul D. Hauck, Carol C. Walsh & Neal E. A. Kroll - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):160-162.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  13
    Misleading questions and the retrieval of the irretrievable.Neal E. A. Kroll & Derek A. Timourian - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (3):165-168.
  3.  18
    Visual and auditory short-term memory: The effects of phonemically similar auditory shadow material during the retention interval.Stanley R. Parkinson, Theodore E. Parks & Neal E. Kroll - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):274.
  4.  26
    Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
  5.  21
    Visual memory as indicated by latency of recognition for normal and reversed letters.M. H. Kellicutt, Theodore E. Parks, Neal E. Kroll & Philip M. Salzberg - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):387.
  6.  33
    Eyewitness memory and the importance of sequential information.Neal E. A. Kroll, Keith H. Ogawa & James E. Nieters - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (5):395-398.
  7.  25
    Effects of irrelevant color changes on speed of visual recognition following short retention intervals.Neal E. Kroll, M. H. Kellicutt, Raymond W. Berrian & Alan F. Kreisler - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):97.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  12
    Learning of several simultaneous probability learning problems as a function of overall event probability and prior knowledge.Neal E. Kroll - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):209.
  9.  19
    Release of proactive interference as a result of changing presentation modality.Neal E. Kroll, Joan Bee & Gabriele Gurski - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):131.
  10.  15
    Sensory and active storage of compound visual and auditory stimuli.Neal E. Kroll, Stanley R. Parkinson & Theodore E. Parks - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):32.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  17
    Short-term memory while shadowing: Recall of visually and of aurally presented letters.Neal E. Kroll, Theodore Parks, Stanley R. Parkinson, Stephen L. Bieber & Alford Lee Johnson - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):220.
  12. The bizarre long-term effects of bizarre mnemonics.Nea Kroll & Em Schepeler - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):337-338.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  22
    Persistence of visual memory as indicated by decision time in a matching task.Theodore E. Parks, Neal E. Kroll, Philip M. Salzberg & Stanley R. Parkinson - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):437.
  14. Unpacking explicit memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Joel R. Quamme, Andrew P. Yonelinas & Neal Ea Kroll - 2006 - In Hubert Zimmer, Axel Mecklinger & Ulman Lindenberger (eds.), Handbook of Binding and Memory: Perspectives From Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
  15.  24
    Retroactive effect of phonemic similarity on short-term recall of visual and auditory stimuli.Philip M. Salzerg, T. E. Parks, Neal E. Kroll & Stanley R. Parkinson - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):43.
  16.  29
    The neural substrates of recollection and familiarity.Andrew P. Yonelinas, Neal E. A. Kroll, Ian G. Dobbins, Michele Lazzara & Robert T. Knight - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):468-469.
    Aggleton & Brown argue that a hippocampal-anterior thalamic system supports the “recollection” of contextual information about previous events, and that a separate perirhinal-medial dorsal thalamic system supports detection of stimulus “familiarity.” Although there is a growing body of human literature that is in agreement with these claims, when recollection and familiarity have been examined in amnesics using the process dissociation or the remember/know procedures, the results do not seem to provide consistent support. We reexamine these studies and describe the results (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  24
    The bizarre mnemonic: The effect of retention interval and mode of presentation.Carrie L. Zoller, Jeff S. Workman & Neal E. A. Kroll - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (3):215-218.