10 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Nicolas Claidière [9]N. Claidière [1]
  1.  47
    The role of attraction in cultural evolution.Nicolas Claidière & Dan Sperber - 2007 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 7 (1-2):89-111.
    Henrich and Boyd (2002) were the first to propose a formal model of the role of attraction in cultural evolution. They came to the surprising conclusion that, when both attraction and selection are at work, final outcomes are determined by selection alone. This result is based on a deterministic view of cultural attraction, different from the probabilistic view introduced in Sperber (1996). We defend this probabilistic view, show how to model it, and argue that, when both attraction and selection are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  2.  18
    Does discussion make crowds any wiser?H. Mercier & N. Claidière - 2022 - Cognition 222 (C):104912.
  3.  62
    Why Modeling Cultural Evolution Is Still Such a Challenge.Dan Sperber & Nicolas Claidière - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (1):20-22.
    The idea that cultural evolution exhibits variation, competition, and inheritance and therefore can be studied by adjusting the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection is an attractive one. It has been argued by a number of authors (e.g., Campbell 1960; Monod 1970; Dawkins 1976; Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman 1981; Boyd and Richerson 1985; Durham 1991; Aunger 2002; Mesoudi et al. 2004) and pursued in a variety of ways, some (Dawkins and memeticists) staying close to the Darwinian model, others (e.g., Boyd, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  4. A Colour Sorting Task Reveals the Limits of the Universalist/Relativist Dichotomy: Colour Categories Can Be Both Language Specific and Perceptual.Nicolas Claidière, Yasmina Jraissati & Coralie Chevallier - 2008 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 (3-4):211-233.
    We designed a new protocol requiring French adult participants to group a large number of Munsell colour chips into three or four groups. On one, relativist, view, participants would be expected to rely on their colour lexicon in such a task. In this framework, the resulting groups should be more similar to French colour categories than to other languages categories. On another, universalist, view, participants would be expected to rely on universal features of perception. In this second framework, the resulting (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  58
    The natural selection of fidelity in social learning.Dan Sperber & Nicolas Claidière - unknown
    Social learning mechanisms are usually assumed to explain both the spread and the persistence of cultural behaviour. In a recent article, we showed that the fidelity of social learning commonly found in transmission chain experiments is not high enough to explain cultural stability. Here we want to both enrich and qualify this conclusion by looking at the case of song transmission in song birds, which can be faithful to the point of being true replication. We argue that this high fidelity (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  41
    A colour sorting task reveals the limits of the Universalist/Relativist dichotomy.Nicolas Claidière, Yasmina Jraissati & Coralie Chevallier - 2008 - Journal of Culture and Cognition 8:211-233.
    We designed a new protocol requiring French adult participants to group a large number of Munsell colour chips into three or four groups. On one, relativist, view, participants would be expected to rely on their colour lexicon in such a task. In this [ramework, the resulting groups should be more similar to French colour categories than to other languages categories. On another, universalist, view, participants would be expected to rely on universal features of perception. In this second framework, the resulting (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  12
    Taking into account the wider evolutionary context of cumulative cultural evolution.Nicolas Claidière - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    The target article reviews evidence showing that technological reasoning is crucial to cumulative technological culture but it fails to discuss the implications for the emergence of cumulative cultural evolution in general. The target article supports the social view of CCE against the more ecological alternative and suggests that CCE appears when specialised individual-learning mechanisms evolve.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  5
    Understanding Imitation in Papio papio: The Role of Experience and the Presence of a Conspecific Demonstrator.Anthony Formaux, Eoin O'Sullivan, Joël Fagot & Nicolas Claidière - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (3):e13117.
    Cognitive Science, Volume 46, Issue 3, March 2022.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  7
    Being Easy to Communicate Might Make Verdicts Based on Confessions More Legitimate.Hugo Mercier, Anne-Sophie Hacquin & Nicolas Claidière - 2021 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 21 (3-4):203-225.
    In many judicial systems, confessions are a requirement for criminal conviction. Even if confessions are intrinsically convincing, this might not entirely explain why they play such a paramount role. In addition, it has been suggested that confessions owe their importance to their legitimizing role, explaining why they could be required even when other evidence has convinced a judge. But why would confessions be particularly suited to justify verdicts? One possibility is that they can be more easily transmitted from one individual (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  33
    The animal variations: When mechanisms matter in accounting for function.Hugo Viciana & Nicolas Claidiere - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):424-425.
    We contend that Ramsey et al.'s definition of animal innovation sensu process may be partially misleading when investigating mechanisms underlying animal innovation. By excluding social learning from the of innovation, they may be reproducing a dichotomous schema that does not accurately correspond to our knowledge of the acquisition of novel behavioral variants. This gives us some reason to doubt the functional specification of the defined process of innovation.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark