Results for 'Mogens L��rke'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. MOGENS LÆRKE: Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. La genèse d'une opposition complexe (= Travaux de philosophie 16).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):123.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  7
    Edited by Raphaele Andrault, Mogens Lærke. Steno and the Philosophers. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, 2018, Xii + 291 Pp. ISBN: 9789004360648. [REVIEW]Lucio Mare - 2019 - Centaurus 61 (4):449-451.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  6
    Paul Rateau , L’Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  1
    Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy.Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press USA.
    This volume collects contributions from leading scholars of early modern philosophy from a wide variety of philosophical and geographic backgrounds. The distinguished contributors offer very different, competing approaches to the history of philosophy.Many chapters articulate new, detailed methods of doing history of philosophy. These present conflicting visions of the history of philosophy as an autonomous sub-discipline of professional philosophy. Several other chapters offer new approaches to integrating history into one's philosophy by re-telling the history of recent philosophy. A number of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  10
    Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
    In this article, I discuss how Leibniz’s first correspondence with Malebranche from early 1676 can shed new light on the notorious “all-things-are-one”-passage found in the Quod ens perfectissimum sit possibile from late 1676—a passage that has been taken as an expression of monism or Spinozism in the young Leibniz. The correspondence with Malebranche provides a deeper understanding of Leibniz’s use of the notions of “real distinction” and “separability” in the ATOP. This forms the background for a discussion of Leibniz’s commitment (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  11
    Les Lumières de Leibniz: Controverses Avec Huet, Bayle, Regis Et More by Mogens Lærke. [REVIEW]Kristen Irwin - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):338-339.
    The historiography of philosophy is a hot topic these days. One need only peruse the 2013 Philosophy and Its History, edited by Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith, and Eric Schliesser, or this journal’s debate between Daniel Garber and Michael Della Rocca, to see that methodological issues in the history of philosophy are the subject of substantive contemporary discussion. In the volume under review, Lærke defends an approach to the historiography of philosophy that is fundamentally inseparable from the history (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the Ethics.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439-462.
  8.  2
    Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy by Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith, Eric Schliesser.Stefan Heßbrüggen-Walter - 2014 - Journal of Early Modern Studies 3 (1):145-149.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  58
    Spinoza's Language.Mogens Lærke - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
    when reading spinoza’s Ethics,1 one comes upon a particularly disconcerting passage in Part Three. In an explication of two definitions of ‘favor’ (favor) and ‘indignation’ (indignatio), Spinoza writes,I know that in their common usage these words mean something else. But my purpose is to explain the nature of things, not the meaning of words. I intend to indicate these things by words whose meaning is not entirely opposed to the meaning with which I wish to use them. One warning of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  8
    Structural Analysis and Dianoematics: The History (of the History) of Philosophy According to Martial Gueroult.Mogens Lærke - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (3):581-607.
    this paper offers a critical discussion of Martial Gueroult's philosophical conception of the history of philosophy as a discipline. Gueroult was among the most influential French historians of philosophy in the twentieth century and the author of a long list of monographs on a host of modern philosophers. Gueroult's first book, on Maimon, was published in 1929, quickly followed in 1930 by a monograph on Fichte. In the English-speaking world, he is probably best known for his two-volume Descartes selon l'ordre (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. Introduction.Justin E. H. Smith, Mogens Lærke & Eric Schliesser - 2013 - In Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press USA.
    The introduction explain the need for how an international, inclusive discussion about the range of different methodological approaches from different traditions of philosophy can be read alongside each other and be seen in sometimes very critical conversation with each other. In addition, the introduction identifies four broad themes in the volume: the largest group of chapters advocate methods that promote history of philosophy as an unapologetic, autonomous enterprise with its own criteria within philosophy. Second, three chapters can be seen as (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  25
    Immanence et extériorité absolue.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 134 (2):169-190.
    Cet article explore la conception spinozienne du rapport entre substance et mode en analysant les notions de cause de soi, de cause immanente et de puissance. Nous soutenons que la théorie spinozienne de la causalité constitue une tentative pour développer une ontologie relationnelle de la puissance dans laquelle toute dénomination intrinsèque est fondée sur une dénomination extrinsèque. Par opposition à une interprétation courante selon laquelle la substance de Spinoza est une sorte de grande monade dans laquelle toutes choses inhèrent comme (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  13.  27
    Spinoza: une lecture d'Aristote.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):570 - 573.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 570-573, May 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  14.  7
    Virtual Union, the Seeds of Hatred, and the Fraternal Joining of Hands: Leibniz and Toleration.Mogens Lærke - 2019 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  8
    Reassessing the Radical Enlightenment by Steffen Ducheyne.Mogens Lærke - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (1):168-170.
    This volume includes fifteen chapters, case studies and broader reflections, on the notion of ‘radical enlightenment,’ separated into three main sections entitled, respectively, “The Big Picture,” “Origins and Fate of the Radical Enlightenment, ca. 1660–1720,” and “The Radical Enlightenment in Europe and the New World after ca. 1720.” It is presented as “the first stand-alone collection of studies in English on the Radical Enlightenment.” It is worth mentioning, however, that two very similar volumes already exist in French and German. Like (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  44
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17.  50
    Paul Rateau , L’Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
  18.  37
    Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  19.  60
    Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-694.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  39
    Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12.Mogens Lærke - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
    (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 57-77. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.696052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  41
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant: Leibniz's Ontology of Possibility, 1668-1678.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22. Qu’est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’'ge classique. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  16
    Three Texts on the Kabbalah: More, Wachter, Leibniz, and the Philosophy of the Hebrews.Mogens Lærke - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5):1011-1030.
    The article reconstructs a brief controversy between H. More, G. W. Leibniz and J. G. Wachter about the Kabbalah, or what they called ‘the philosophy of the Hebrews’. I study in particular the status of the proposition ‘nothing comes out of nothing’ in their exchanges - a proposition they all agreed was a fundamental kabbalist axiom while having differing views as to the prospects of reconciling that position with Christianity. I show how Wachter’s curious Kabbalistico-Spinozism provided the stage for an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  9
    Negotium Irenicum. L’Union des Églises Protestantes Selon G. W. Leibniz and D. E. Jablonski. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2016 - The Leibniz Review 26:207-213.
  25.  26
    Spinoza on the Eternity of the Mind.Mogens Lærke - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (2):265-286.
    In this paper, I propose a reading of Spinoza’s theory of the eternity of the mind in light of his theory of essence and existence. Opposing in particular recent Platonist readings of this theory, rejecting the dichotomy between formal essence and actual essence, upon which they mostly rely, I argue that Spinoza’s conception of the eternity of the mind must be grasped in terms of different aspects of one and the same existence. I moreover suggest that, for Spinoza, the mind (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Four Things Deleuze Learned From Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2010 - In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave-Macmillan.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  52
    Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
    This article is about Gilles Deleuze's book Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque from 1988. It shows how Deleuze's notion of folding captures some basic intuitions in Leibniz and how they relate to each other. To this purpose, I propose five figures, all referring to the same basic fold, all illustrating how the consideration of such figures allows developing central elements of Leibniz's monadology. These figures can help, I hope, alleviate some of the fundamental difficulties in understanding Deleuze's approach to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  7
    Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  30.  16
    Historiographies of Philosophy 1800–1950.Leo Catana & Mogens Lærke - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (3):431-441.
    Volume 28, Issue 3, May 2020, Page 431-441.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  10
    Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu'est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l'âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute !), 2007, 404 pages, 24 €. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    Ce beau volume rassemble vingt-trois contributions à un colloque international sur le thème des « Lumières radicales », tenu à l’École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines à Lyon en février 2004. L’objectif du colloque était de s’interroger sur le sens et la pertinence de cette catégorie historiographique qui s’est imposée dans l’histoire intellectuelle du xviie et du xviiie siècle depuis quelques décennies déjà, mais avec une force considérable depuis une dizaine d’années. Le volu..
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  4
    Toland Et Leibniz. L’Invention du Néo-Spinozisme. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  33.  7
    Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  4
    Paul Rateau , L’Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  2
    Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu’est-ce que les Lumières « radicales »? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’'ge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute!), 2007, 404 pag. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  16
    Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Pp. XXIV + 604. Price £224.50 Hb.). [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  35
    A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  17
    Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy (Review).Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):131-132.
  39.  7
    Leibniz, the Encyclopedia, and the Natural Order of Thinking.Mogens Lærke - 2014 - Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (2):237-259.
  40.  5
    Leibniz, la censure et la libre pensée.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - Archives de Philosophie 2:273-287.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  35
    Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
  42.  30
    Leibniz on the Principle of Equipollence and Spinoza’s Causal Axiom.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:123-130.
  43.  4
    Spinozism, Kabbalism, and Idealism From Johann Georg Wachter to Moses Mendelssohn.Mogens Lærke - 2021 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 3 (1):3.
    The paper studies the historical background for the ‘idealist’ reading of Spinoza usually traced back to British and German Idealism. Here, I follow this history further back than and focus on one earlier idealist reading, indeed perhaps the mother of them all. It can be found in the _Elucidarius cabalisticus, sive reconditae Hebraeorum philosophiae brevis et succincta recensio_ by Johann Georg Wachter, a kabbalist interpretation of Spinoza published in 1706. I am principally interested in the importance that Wachter’s book may (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  37
    A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery: Leibniz, Tschirnhaus and Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  48
    Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou (Eds.), Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:153-155.
  46.  19
    Leibniz on Church and State: Presumptive Logic and Perplexing Cases.Mogens LÆrke - 2018 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (4):629-657.
    this paper has a double objective. On the one hand, it aims to examine Leibniz's approach to church-state relations, a central question in early modern political philosophy that has rarely been discussed in the context of the philosopher of Hanover despite the fact that his political texts contain much to be appreciated on the topic. On the other hand, it aims at providing a prominent example of how Leibniz's political philosophy, contrary to what is often held, was not exclusively grounded (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  28
    The Art of Controversies, G. W. Leibniz. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (1):205-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. All the Forms of Matter: Leibniz, Regis and the World’s Infinity.Mogens Lærke - 2018 - In Igor Agostini, Richard T. W. Arthur, Geoffrey Gorham, Paul Guyer, Mogens Lærke, Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Ohad Nachtomy, Sanja Särman, Anat Schechtman, Noa Shein & Reed Winegar (eds.), Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 115-129.
    In 1697, the publication of a letter from Leibniz to Bourguet in the Journal des Sçavants prompted a vigorous reply from the Cartesien Pierre-Sylvain Regis, leading to a public exchange between the two philosophers. The controversy ended with a contribution by Regis who seemingly got the final word. The exchange mainly focused on Descartes’s Principles of philosophy, III, art. 47, a text where Descartes held that the world would eventually take all the possible forms it is capable of. While Leibniz (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Si Hæc Mentis Imaginandi Facultas Libera Esset..Mogens Lærke - 2003 - Agora 21 (2-03):241-275.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  34
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
1 — 50 / 1000