Results for 'Mogens L��rke'

999 found
Order:
  1.  7
    Mogens Lærke, Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing.Dan Taylor - 2021 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 55 (1):76-77.
  2. MOGENS LÆRKE: Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. La genèse d'une opposition complexe (= Travaux de philosophie 16).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):123.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  8
    Mogens L ærke, Spinoza and the freedom of philosophizing, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, 387 p.Jacques-Louis Lantoine - 2022 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 115 (3):442-444.
  4.  10
    Edited by Raphaele Andrault, Mogens Lærke. Steno and the philosophers. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, 2018, xii + 291 pp. ISBN: 9789004360648. [REVIEW]Lucio Mare - 2019 - Centaurus 61 (4):449-451.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  7
    Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing by Mogens Lærke. [REVIEW]Julie R. Klein - 2023 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 61 (3):523-525.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Mogens Lærke. Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. xviii + 387. Hardback, $115.00. -/- Spinoza's political philosophy, always a subject of attention in Francophone scholarship, has been coming into sharper focus for Anglophone readers in recent years as well. Mogens Lærke—well known for his essays on metaphysics and cognition in Spinoza, for his invaluable book Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza (Paris: (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  16
    Les Lumières de Leibniz: Controverses avec Huet, Bayle, Regis et More by Mogens Lærke. [REVIEW]Kristen Irwin - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):338-339.
    The historiography of philosophy is a hot topic these days. One need only peruse the 2013 Philosophy and Its History, edited by Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith, and Eric Schliesser, or this journal’s debate between Daniel Garber and Michael Della Rocca, to see that methodological issues in the history of philosophy are the subject of substantive contemporary discussion. In the volume under review, Lærke defends an approach to the historiography of philosophy that is fundamentally inseparable from the history (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  4
    Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing.Mogens Lærke - 2021 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    This study considers freedom of speech and the rules of engagement in the public sphere; good government, civic responsibility, and public education; and the foundations of religion and society, as seen through the eyes of seventeenth-century Dutch philosopher, Spinoza.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  22
    Historiographies of philosophy 1800–1950.Leo Catana & Mogens Lærke - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (3):431-441.
    Volume 28, Issue 3, May 2020, Page 431-441.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Spinoza’s Cosmological Argument in the Ethics.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439-462.
  10.  51
    Paul Rateau (ed.), L’Idée de théodicée de Leibniz à Kant: héritage, transformations, critiques. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
  11.  38
    Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling (KV) in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Introduction.Justin E. H. Smith, Mogens Lærke & Eric Schliesser - 2013 - In Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press USA.
    The introduction explain the need for how an international, inclusive discussion about the range of different methodological approaches from different traditions of philosophy can be read alongside each other and be seen in sometimes very critical conversation with each other. In addition, the introduction identifies four broad themes in the volume: the largest group of chapters advocate methods that promote history of philosophy as an unapologetic, autonomous enterprise with its own criteria within philosophy. Second, three chapters can be seen as (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  13.  61
    Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-694.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  9
    Negotium Irenicum. L’union des Églises protestantes selon G. W. Leibniz and D. E. Jablonski. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2016 - The Leibniz Review 26:207-213.
  15. Qu’est-ce que les Lumières « radicales »? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’'ge classique. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  8
    Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling (KV) in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  19
    French historiographical Spinozism, 1893–2018. Delbos, Gueroult, Vernière, Moreau.Mogens Lærke - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (3):653-672.
    This paper explores a methodological lineage among French Spinoza scholars which can be traced back to texts written by Victor Delbos (1862–1916), which later branched out into two diametrically opposed orientations in the work by Martial Gueroult (1891–1976) and Paul Vernière (1916–1997), only to be reunited reflexively in the more recent work by Pierre-François Moreau (1948-). The aim is mostly to offer an original reconstruction of the way in which Delbos’ historical programme was inherited by subsequent Spinoza scholars. While retracing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  76
    Spinoza’s Language.Mogens Lærke - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
    when reading spinoza’s Ethics,1 one comes upon a particularly disconcerting passage in Part Three. In an explication of two definitions of ‘favor’ (favor) and ‘indignation’ (indignatio), Spinoza writes,I know that in their common usage these words mean something else. But my purpose is to explain the nature of things, not the meaning of words. I intend to indicate these things by words whose meaning is not entirely opposed to the meaning with which I wish to use them. One warning of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19.  5
    Paul Rateau , L’Idée de théodicée de Leibniz à Kant: héritage, transformations, critiques.Mogens Lærke - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  34
    Spinoza on the Eternity of the Mind.Mogens Lærke - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (2):265-286.
    In this paper, I propose a reading of Spinoza’s theory of the eternity of the mind in light of his theory of essence and existence. Opposing in particular recent Platonist readings of this theory, rejecting the dichotomy between formal essence and actual essence, upon which they mostly rely, I argue that Spinoza’s conception of the eternity of the mind must be grasped in terms of different aspects of one and the same existence. I moreover suggest that, for Spinoza, the mind (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  73
    Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
    This article is about Gilles Deleuze's book Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque from 1988. It shows how Deleuze's notion of folding captures some basic intuitions in Leibniz and how they relate to each other. To this purpose, I propose five figures, all referring to the same basic fold, all illustrating how the consideration of such figures allows developing central elements of Leibniz's monadology. These figures can help, I hope, alleviate some of the fundamental difficulties in understanding Deleuze's approach to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  22.  31
    Immanence et extériorité absolue.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 134 (2):169-190.
    Cet article explore la conception spinozienne du rapport entre substance et mode en analysant les notions de cause de soi, de cause immanente et de puissance. Nous soutenons que la théorie spinozienne de la causalité constitue une tentative pour développer une ontologie relationnelle de la puissance dans laquelle toute dénomination intrinsèque est fondée sur une dénomination extrinsèque. Par opposition à une interprétation courante selon laquelle la substance de Spinoza est une sorte de grande monade dans laquelle toutes choses inhèrent comme (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  23.  12
    Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu'est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l'âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute !), 2007, 404 pages, 24 €. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    Ce beau volume rassemble vingt-trois contributions à un colloque international sur le thème des « Lumières radicales », tenu à l’École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines à Lyon en février 2004. L’objectif du colloque était de s’interroger sur le sens et la pertinence de cette catégorie historiographique qui s’est imposée dans l’histoire intellectuelle du xviie et du xviiie siècle depuis quelques décennies déjà, mais avec une force considérable depuis une dizaine d’années. Le volu..
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  18
    Three texts on the Kabbalah: More, Wachter, Leibniz, and the philosophy of the Hebrews.Mogens Lærke - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5):1011-1030.
    The article reconstructs a brief controversy between H. More, G. W. Leibniz and J. G. Wachter about the Kabbalah, or what they called ‘the philosophy of the Hebrews’. I study in particular the status of the proposition ‘nothing comes out of nothing’ in their exchanges - a proposition they all agreed was a fundamental kabbalist axiom while having differing views as to the prospects of reconciling that position with Christianity. I show how Wachter’s curious Kabbalistico-Spinozism provided the stage for an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  4
    Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu’est-ce que les Lumières « radicales »? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’'ge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute!), 2007, 404 pag. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - Astérion 6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  9
    Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-694.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  15
    Structural Analysis and Dianoematics: The History (of the History) of Philosophy according to Martial Gueroult.Mogens Lærke - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (3):581-607.
    this paper offers a critical discussion of Martial Gueroult's philosophical conception of the history of philosophy as a discipline. Gueroult was among the most influential French historians of philosophy in the twentieth century and the author of a long list of monographs on a host of modern philosophers. Gueroult's first book, on Maimon, was published in 1929, quickly followed in 1930 by a monograph on Fichte. In the English-speaking world, he is probably best known for his two-volume Descartes selon l'ordre (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  47
    Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12.Mogens Lærke - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
    (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 57-77. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.696052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29.  32
    Spinoza: une lecture d'Aristote.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):570 - 573.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 570-573, May 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30.  45
    Quod non omnia possibilia ad existentiam perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  31.  42
    Quod non omnia possibilia ad existentiam perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  32.  4
    Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy.Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.) - 2013 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
    This volume collects contributions from leading scholars of early modern philosophy from a wide variety of philosophical and geographic backgrounds. The distinguished contributors offer very different, competing approaches to the history of philosophy.Many chapters articulate new, detailed methods of doing history of philosophy. These present conflicting visions of the history of philosophy as an autonomous sub-discipline of professional philosophy. Several other chapters offer new approaches to integrating history into one's philosophy by re-telling the history of recent philosophy. A number of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  9
    Quod non omnia possibilia ad existentiam perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  34.  8
    Virtual Union, the Seeds of Hatred, and the Fraternal Joining of Hands: Leibniz and Toleration.Mogens Lærke - 2019 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  9
    Reassessing the Radical Enlightenment by Steffen Ducheyne.Mogens Lærke - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (1):168-170.
    This volume includes fifteen chapters, case studies and broader reflections, on the notion of ‘radical enlightenment,’ separated into three main sections entitled, respectively, “The Big Picture,” “Origins and Fate of the Radical Enlightenment, ca. 1660–1720,” and “The Radical Enlightenment in Europe and the New World after ca. 1720.” It is presented as “the first stand-alone collection of studies in English on the Radical Enlightenment.” It is worth mentioning, however, that two very similar volumes already exist in French and German. Like (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. Four Things Deleuze Learned from Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2010 - In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave-Macmillan.
  37. Compossibility, Compatibility, Congruity.Mogens Lærke - 2016 - In Yual Chiek & Gregory Brown (eds.), Leibniz on Compossibility and Possible Worlds. Springer. pp. 125-144.
  38.  15
    Quod non omnia possibilia ad existentiam perveniant.Mogens Lærke - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  39. Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  34
    Leibniz on the Principle of Equipollence and Spinoza’s Causal Axiom.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:123-130.
  41.  35
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
  42.  5
    Spinoza et la liberté de philosopher.Mogens Lærke - 2023 - Cahiers Philosophiques 169 (2):39-49.
    Dans cette contribution, je reviens sur la « liberté de philosopher » que, selon le sous-titre de l’ouvrage, Spinoza se propose de défendre dans son Traité théologico-politique. Je montre notamment qu’il s’agit d’une forme complexe et positive de liberté à ne pas confondre avec la conception de la liberté d’expression et du free speech dont on parle dans le discours politique d’aujourd’hui. Je montre ainsi que la liberté de philosopher n’est pas un droit civil accordé par l’État mais un style (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  31
    The problem of alloglossia . Leibniz on Spinoza's innovative use of philosophical language.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):939 – 953.
  44.  14
    Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Mogens Lærke - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  3
    Spinoza in France, ca. 1670–1970.Mogens Lærke - 2021 - In Yitzhak Y. Melamed (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 506–516.
    This chapter proposes a very condensed overview of some three centuries of Spinoza reception in France, from around 1670 to 1970. Spinoza's presence in the history of French philosophy is pervasive, deep, and varied. The chapter presents some of the most important figures and stages in that inextricable double history of both Spinozism from the viewpoint of French philosophy and French philosophy from the viewpoint of Spinozism. The translation is a testimony to the depth with which the French libertine tradition (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  18
    Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Pp. XXIV + 604. Price £224.50 hb.). [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Accidents and modifications: an additional note on Axioms 1 and 2 in Appendix 1 of the short treatise.Mogens Lærke - 2019 - In Jack Stetter & Charles Ramond (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
  48.  1
    Les Lumières de Leibniz: controverses avec Huet, Bayle, Regis et More.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - Paris: Classiques Garnier.
    Les Lumières de Leibniz mettent en oeuvre une méthode inédite en histoire de la philosophie : le perspectivisme historique. En prenant Leibniz pour guide dans la république des lettres, le livre propose une perspective immanente sur quatre controverses philosophiques du XVIIe siècle.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's MetaphysicsOhad Nachtomy Collection «The New Synthese Historical Library» Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, 268 p. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  36
    A Conjecture about a Textual Mystery.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 999