Order:
See also
Max Jones
University of Bristol
  1. The rationale of rationalization.Walter Veit, Joe Dewhurst, Krzysztof Dołęga, Max Jones, Shaun Stanley, Keith Frankish & Daniel C. Dennett - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e53.
    While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  48
    Numerals and neural reuse.Max Jones - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3657-3681.
    Menary OpenMIND, MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main, 2015) has argued that the development of our capacities for mathematical cognition can be explained in terms of enculturation. Our ancient systems for perceptually estimating numerical quantities are augmented and transformed by interacting with a culturally-enriched environment that provides scaffolds for the acquisition of cognitive practices, leading to the development of a discrete number system for representing number precisely. Numerals and the practices associated with numeral systems play a significant role in this process. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  3. The body as laboratory: Prediction-error minimization, embodiment, and representation.Christopher Burr & Max Jones - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):586-600.
    In his paper, Jakob Hohwy outlines a theory of the brain as an organ for prediction-error minimization, which he claims has the potential to profoundly alter our understanding of mind and cognition. One manner in which our understanding of the mind is altered, according to PEM, stems from the neurocentric conception of the mind that falls out of the framework, which portrays the mind as “inferentially-secluded” from its environment. This in turn leads Hohwy to reject certain theses of embodied cognition. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  4.  6
    Correction to: Numerals and neural reuse.Max Jones - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3683-3683.
    The original publication contained an incorrect copyright holder.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  37
    Number concepts for the concept empiricist.Max Jones - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (3):334-348.
    Dove and Machery both argue that recent findings about the nature of numerical representation present problems for Concept Empiricism. I shall argue that, whilst this evidence does challenge certain versions of CE, such as Prinz, it needn’t be seen as problematic to the general CE approach. Recent research can arguably be seen to support a CE account of number concepts. Neurological and behavioral evidence suggests that systems involved in the perception of numerical properties are also implicated in numerical cognition. Furthermore, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  26
    Cognitive structural realism: A radical solution to the problem of scientific representation.Max Jones - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (5):772-775.
    Volume 33, Issue 5, July 2020, Page 772-775.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  27
    After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain.Max Jones - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (7):1080-1083.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  28
    What are we doing when we perceive numbers?Max Jones, Karim Zahidi & Daniel D. Hutto - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.
    Clarke and Beck rightly contend that the number sense allows us to directly perceive number. However, they unnecessarily assume a representationalist approach and incur a heavy theoretical cost by invoking “modes of presentation.” We suggest that the relevant evidence is better explained by adopting a radical enactivist approach that avoids characterizing the approximate number system as a system for representing number.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  26
    Why do the British still remember Scott of the Antarctic?Max Jones - 2012 - ACME: Annali della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell'Università degli studi di Milano 65 (3):47-58.
    the announcement of the death of the British polar explorer captain robert scott on his return from the south Pole, which he had reached on 17 January 1912, caused a sensation in Britain and around the world. Although he lost the race to the south Pole to a norwegian party led by roald Amundsen, the recent centenary of scott’s last expedition aroused widespread interest not only in Britain but around the world. this paper examines why the British public continues to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  40
    Review of An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics[REVIEW]Max Jones - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (2):281-288.
    In An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics Franklin develops a tantalizing alternative to Platonist and nominalist approaches by arguing that at least some mathematical universals exist in the physical realm and are knowable through ordinary methods of access to physical reality. By offering a third option that lies between these extreme all-or-nothing approaches and by rejecting the ‘dichotomy of objects into abstract and concrete’, Franklin provides potential solutions to many of these traditional problems and opens up a whole new terrain (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations