10 found
Order:
  1.  31
    Transforming Knowledge Systems for Life on Earth: Visions of Future Systems and How to Get There.Ioan Fazey, Niko Schäpke, Guido Caniglia, Anthony Hodgson, Ian Kendrick, Christopher Lyon, Glenn Page, James Patterson, Chris Riedy, Tim Strasser, Stephan Verveen, David Adams, Bruce Goldstein, Matthias Klaes, Graham Leicester, Alison Linyard, Adrienne McCurdy, Paul Ryan, Bill Sharpe, Giorgia Silvestri, Ali Yansyah Abdurrahim, David Abson, Olufemi Samson Adetunji, Paulina Aldunce, Carlos Alvarez-Pereira, Jennifer Marie Amparo, Helene Amundsen, Lakin Anderson, Lotta Andersson, Michael Asquith, Karoline Augenstein, Jack Barrie, David Bent, Julia Bentz, Arvid Bergsten, Carol Berzonsky, Olivia Bina, Kirsty Blackstock, Joanna Boehnert, Hilary Bradbury, Christine Brand, Jessica Böhme, Marianne Mille Bøjer, Esther Carmen, Lakshmi Charli-Joseph, Sarah Choudhury, Supot Chunhachoti-Ananta, Jessica Cockburn, John Colvin, Irena L. C. Connon & Rosalind Cornforth - 2020 - Energy Research and Social Science 70.
    Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  64
    Reflexivity: Curse or Cure?John B. Davis & Matthias Klaes - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):329-352.
    Reflexivity has been argued to be self?defeating and potentially devastating for the sociology of scientific knowledge. We first survey various meanings associated with the concept of reflexivity and then provide an interpretation of Velázquez's Las Meñinas to generate a three?part taxonomy of reflexivity, distinguishing between ?immanent?, ?epistemic? and ?transcendent? reflexivity. This provides the basis for engaging with reflexivity as a problem in the economic methodology literature, focusing on recent contributions to the topic by Hands, Sent, Mäki and Mirowski. Employment of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  1
    Open Economics. Economics in Relation to Other Disciplines. Richard Arena; Sheila Dow & Matthias Klaes (Eds).Richard Arena, Sheila Dow, Matthias Klaes, Brian J. Loasby, Bruna Ingrao, Pier Luigi Porta, Sergio Volodia Cremaschi, Mark Harrison, Alain Clément, Ludovic Desmedt, Nicola Giocoli, Giovanna Garrone, Roberto Marchionatti, Maurice Lagueux, Michele Alacevich, Andrea Costa, Giovanna Vertova, Hugh Goodacre, Joachim Zweynert & Isabelle This Saint-Jean - 2009 - Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    Economics has developed into one of the most specialised social sciences. Yet at the same time, it shares its subject matter with other social sciences and humanities and its method of analysis has developed in close correspondence with the natural and life sciences. This book offers an up to date assessment of economics in relation to other disciplines. -/- This edited collection explores fields as diverse as mathematics, physics, biology, medicine, sociology, architecture, and literature, drawing from selected contributions to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  8
    Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics: Introduction.Matthias Klaes - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (2):121-124.
  5. Philosophy and Economics.Matthias Klaes - 2017 - Routledge.
  6.  42
    Applying Economics, Using Evidence.Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
    Traditionally, evidence in economics has been seen in the context of theory choice. Much of recent methodological debate on the role of evidence has turned on the recognition that the status and role of evidence is somewhat more involved in economics than the conventional wisdom suggests. Rather than approaching this question in general terms from a starting point of philosophy of science or even science studies, our aim in this introduction to a symposium of articles on evidence in economics is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    Imprecise Precision: Rejoinder to Basbøll.John Davis & Matthias Klaes - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):121-123.
  8.  24
    Evolutionary Economics: In Defence of 'Vagueness'.Matthias Klaes - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):359-376.
    Evolutionary economics is an increasingly influential but vaguely defined field of economic research. This article discusses different ways of defining evolutionary economics: at its object level, at the level of core concepts and, distinguishing between meaning determinist and meaning finitist interpretations, as a social institution. A meaning finitist interpretation of ?evolutionary economics?, referring to evolutionary economics as a social institution, is suggested to provide a positive account of the diversity of attempts to define evolutionary economics, drawing from an evolutionary framework (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  4
    Philip Mirowski , Natural Images in Economic Thought: ‘Markets Read in Tooth and Claw’. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Pp. Xiii + 618. ISBN 0-521-47884-7. £22.95. [REVIEW]Matthias Klaes - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (3):376-377.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  34
    Review of Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. [REVIEW]Matthias Klaes - 2009 - Economics and Philosophy 25 (3):389-397.