Order:
  1.  58
    Stem cell research in a catholic institution: Yes or no?Michael R. Prieur, Joan Atkinson, Laurie Hardingham, David Hill, Gillian Kernaghan, Debra Miller, Sandy Morton, Mary Rowell, John F. Vallely & Suzanne Wilson - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):73-98.
    : Catholic teaching has no moral difficulties with research on stem cells derived from adult stem cells or fetal cord blood. The ethical problem comes with embryonic stem cells since their genesis involves the destruction of a human embryo. However, there seems to be significant promise of health benefits from such research. Although Catholic teaching does not permit any destruction of human embryos, the question remains whether researchers in a Catholic institution, or any researchers opposed to destruction of human embryos, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  58
    The dream of consensus: Finding common ground in a bioethical context.Tom Koch & Mary Rowell - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):261-273.
    Consensus is the holy grail of bioethics, the lynch pin of the assumption that well informed, well intentioned people may reach generally acceptable positions on ethically contentious issues. It has been especially important in bioethics, where advancing technology has assured an increasing field of complex medical dilemmas. This paper results on the use of a multicriterion decision making system (MCDM) analyzing group process in an attempt to better define hospital policy. In a pilot program at The Hospital for Sick Children, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  39
    Response to Special Section: Cloning: Technology, Policy, and Ethics.Tom Koch & Mary Rowell - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):241-245.
    A recent issue of CambridgeQuarterlyofHealthcareEthics provides a fascinating look into the uncertainties surrounding the subject of human cloning. As Nelkin and Lindee point out, for example, the popular assumption is that this technology will lead to individual immortality. life everlasting for the deserving.considers the use of cloning for the replication of human individuals to be ethically unacceptable.”.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  27
    Shared leadership: The freedom to do bioethics. [REVIEW]Dawn Dudley Oosterhoff & Mary Rowell - 2004 - HEC Forum 16 (4):297-316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation