Order:
  1.  3
    Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field.Marlies Glasius, Meta de Lange, Jos Bartman, Emanuela Dalmasso, Aofei Lv, Adele Del Sordi, Marcus Michaelsen & Kris Ruijgrok - 2017 - Springer Verlag.
    This Open Access book offers a synthetic reflection on the authors’ fieldwork experiences in seven countries within the framework of ‘Authoritarianism in a Global Age’, a major comparative research project. It responds to the demand for increased attention to methodological rigor and transparency in qualitative research, and seeks to advance and practically support field research in authoritarian contexts. Without reducing the conundrums of authoritarian field research to a simple how-to guide, the book systematically reflects and reports on the authors’ combined (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  6
    Bottom-up politics: an agency-centred approach to globalization.Denisa Kostovicova & Marlies Glasius (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
    The writing out of agency from the study of globalization resulted in its portrayal as an uncontrollable, unstoppable and unchangeable force. Ordinary people have been conceptualized as victims or beneficiaries. Alternatively, grassroots activism has been romantically portrayed as an unproblematic force for good. Inspired by the work of Mary Kaldor on global civil society and new wars, the authors explore complex, counterintuitive and even unintended forms and consequences of bottom-up politics as the state loses its dominance as a political actor (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  23
    Trials as Messages of Justice: What Should Be Expected of International Criminal Courts?Tim Meijers & Marlies Glasius - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (4):429-447.
    This article addresses the question what—if anything—we can and should expect from the practice of international criminal justice. It argues that neither retributive nor purely consequentialist, deterrence-based justifications give sufficient guidance as to what international criminal courts should aim to achieve. Instead, the legal theory of expressivism provides a more viable guide. Contrary to other expressivist views, this article argues for the importance of the trial, not just the punishment, as a form of expressivist messaging. Specifically, we emphasize the communicative (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark