Order:
  1.  34
    Recommendations for Hosting Audience Comments Based on Discourse Ethics.Yu Zhang & Mark Cenite - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (4):293-309.
    As a result of simultaneous developments, including the proliferation of opportunities for online feedback, the application of discourse ethics to journalism, and a greater emphasis on journalistic accountability, the time is ripe for revisiting opportunities that online mechanisms provide for holding journalists accountable to audiences. This paper proposes recommendations to guide hosting online comments in light of the Habermasian framework of discourse ethics developed by Glasser and Ettema (2008). It also explores the limits of such approaches in nations with different (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  36
    The obligation to qualify speculation.Mark Cenite - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):43 – 61.
    This article proposes a journalism ethics obligation to identify speculation clearly, attribute it to sources, report any basis for it, and offer appropriate qualification, especially when speculation is based on stereotypes of stigmatized groups. Explicitly recognizing this responsibility addresses a gap in the traditional conception of journalistic responsibilities: When journalists fulfill responsibilities corresponding to their gatekeeper and watchdog roles by reporting sources' views, speculation may enter. Examples from major American newspaper and newsmagazine coverage of Andrew Cunanan, an openly gay man (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  52
    Ethical Learnings from Borat on Informed Consent for Make Benefit Film and Television Producers.Mark Cenite - 2009 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (1):22-39.
    When is it ethically justifiable to mislead participants about the nature of a film or television program? Producers of the 2006 film Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan used brilliantly crafted releases to undermine potential fraud claims from participants misled about the comedy. This article argues that if portraying participants can result in foreseeable, substantial negative consequences for them, the portrayal must serve an overriding public interest. The test is applied to scenes in Borat.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation