The paper is an attempt to reconstruct difficult and problematic, but on the same time vital and crucial, links between liberalism and eurocentrism. That relationship is considered as a result of mutual self-seeking and profit-seeking with the process of colonization as historical and formational “epicenter” of European Modernity. Colonization, the “expansion of Europe” demanded an ideological background and backup which in reverse were fostered and strengthened by the opportunity of belonging to the extensive “colonial space-time”. “Rise of the west” together (...) with “technologies of colonization”, refined and perfectioned during the era of “the long sixteenth century”, would have been inconceivable without a presence of specific “ontology” – the possessive individualism conceptualized and analyzed by C.B. Macpherson in his works on liberal (liberal-democratic) political theory. (shrink)

Cultural, social and religious diversity is one of the most valued and most valuable aspects of our contemporary, globalized world. Sometimes it even tends to be described as a gift and invitation to dialogue instead of conflict and confrontation, as numerous authors – Samuel P. Huntington, Mary Habeck, Paul Berman, Bruce Bawer and many other – would have us to believe. Especially dialogue among religions – Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity and Islam – is an object of peculiar interest, expectations and hopes. (...) Within the paper recent dialogic tendencies in cultures and societies are presented as one of the most important manifestations of humanism (both religious and a-religious), which is reconstructed in reference to social change, modernization, enlightenment, toleration and pluralism as phenomena analyzed and deliberated by Fracis Bacon on one hand and contemporary Macedonian philosopher and Muslim theologian, Ismail Bardhi, on the other. Is enlightenment without secularization possible? Does religious passion and zeal always lead to suspension, “overcoming”, elimination of reason? In the conclusion of the paper the significance of works by young Polish artist, Joanna Rajkowska, is being highlighted as an example of humanism and dialogism which struggle with recent waves of islamophobia in Europe. (shrink)

The paper consists of three parts. In the first one, I consider the validity of the “civilizational paradigm” in contemporary social sciences and humanities, with special emphasis on philosophy and comparative historiographical studies. In the second one, I juxtapose selected Western approaches to civilization—those of Arnold Toynbee, Fernand Braudel and Corroll Quigley—with the perspective proposed by Ibn Khaldūn, the scholar and thinker widely recognized as the father of social sciences, especially those focused on or at least related to civilizational investigations. (...) In the third part of the article, I raise questions about the prospects of reforming and reviving civilizations which undergo a crisis or experience a twilight phase in their development. Finally, in the context of the idea of Islamization of thought and knowledge, as postulated by Abdulhamid Abusu-layma, I address the question of the relationship between civilization and religion. (shrink)

Artykuł stanowi próbę określenia najważniejszych współczesnych trendów dotyczących rozpoznania społecznych, politycznych i kulturowych aspektów myśli (tradycji) liberalnej. W tym celu przedstawione i poddane analizie są dwa podejścia. Pierwsze z nich to główna obecnie definicja liberalizmu przez pryzmat praw i uprawnień jednostki. Teoria liberalna w tym ujęciu związana jest w bardziej ogólnymi dyskursami społeczno-kulturowymi na temat pluralizmu, praw jednostek, rządów prawa, konstytucjonalizmu, swobód politycznych, wolnego rynku i praw człowieka. Z drugiej strony zbadane zostaje stanowisko I. Wallersteina, dla którego liberalizm jest wyrafinowanym (...) konstruktem, projektem nastawionym na stworzenie i rozwijanie "geokultury" współczesnego świata - ideologicznej bazy usprawiedliwiającej nierówną dystrybucję bogactw i władzy w skali globalnej, układu powiązań określanego mianem nowożytnego (kapitalistycznego) systemu-świata. Zdaniem Wallersteina - którego wykładnia zaakceptowana zostaje w niniejszym tekście - ewolucja struktur systemu-świata nie uległa jeszcze zakończeniu, a niedawno jeszcze głoszony triumf kapitalizmu i liberalizmu musi być postrzegany przez pryzmat wielu faz, stadiów rozwoju i przemian zamiast w ramach tezy o "końcu historii". (shrink)