Order:
  1.  29
    Why Do People Participate in Epidemiological Research?Claudia Slegers, Deborah Zion, Deborah Glass, Helen Kelsall, Lin Fritschi, Ngiare Brown & Bebe Loff - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):227-237.
    Many assumptions are made about public willingness to participate in epidemiological research, yet few empirical studies have been conducted to ascertain whether such assumptions are correct. Our qualitative study of the public and of expert stakeholders leads us to suggest that people are generally prepared to participate in epidemiological research, particularly if it is conducted by a trusted public institution such as a government health department, charity, or university. However, there is widespread community distrust of research conducted or sponsored by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Why do people participate in epidemiological research?Claudia Slegers, Deborah Zion, Deborah Glass, Helen Kelsall, Lin Fritschi & Beatrice Loff - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  33
    The IARC Monographs: Updated procedures for modern and transparent evidence synthesis in cancer hazard identification.Jonathan M. Samet, Weihsueh A. Chiu, Vincent Cogliano, Jennifer Jinot, David Kriebel, Ruth M. Lunn, Frederick A. Beland, Lisa Bero, Patience Browne, Lin Fritschi, Jun Kanno, Dirk W. Lachenmeier, Qing Lan, Gérard Lasfargues, Frank Le Curieux, Susan Peters, Pamela Shubat, Hideko Sone, Mary C. White, Jon Williamson, Marianna Yakubovskaya, Jack Siemiatycki, Paul A. White, Kathryn Z. Guyton, Mary K. Schubauer-Berigan, Amy L. Hall, Yann Grosse, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Bruce Armstrong, Rodolfo Saracci, Jiri Zavadil, Kurt Straif & Christopher P. Wild - unknown
    The Monographs produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) apply rigorous procedures for the scientific review and evaluation of carcinogenic hazards by independent experts. The Preamble to the IARC Monographs, which outlines these procedures, was updated in 2019, following recommendations of a 2018 expert Advisory Group. This article presents the key features of the updated Preamble, a major milestone that will enable IARC to take advantage of recent scientific and procedural advances made during the 12 years since (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  16
    A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.Lin Fritschi, Helen L. Kelsall, Bebe Loff, Claudia Slegers, Deborah Zion & Deborah C. Glass - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):545-548.