Order:
  1.  29
    Involuntary Commitment as “Carceral-Health Service”: From Healthcare-to-Prison Pipeline to a Public Health Abolition Praxis.Rafik Wahbi & Leo Beletsky - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (1):23-30.
    Involuntary commitment links the healthcare, public health, and legislative systems to act as a “carceral health-service.” While masquerading as more humane and medicalized, such coercive modalities nevertheless further reinforce the systems, structures, practices, and policies of structural oppression and white supremacy. We argue that due to involuntary commitment’s inextricable connection to the carceral system, and a longer history of violent social control, this legal framework cannot and must not be held out as a viable alternative to the criminal legal system (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  31
    Beyond Decriminalization: Ending the War on Drugs Requires Recasting Police Discretion through the Lens of a Public Health Ethic.John Kleinig, Jeremiah Goulka, Leo Beletsky & Brandon del Pozo - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):41-44.
    Earp, Lewis, and Hart argue the pursuit of racial justice requires a summary end to the war on drugs. In surveying the racially disparate harms of an enforcement-oriented, punitive, and ulti...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  3
    State Approaches to Addressing the Overdose Epidemic: Public Health Focus Needed.Corey Davis, Traci Green, Lindsay LaSalle & Leo Beletsky - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S2):43-46.
    States have implemented a variety of legal and policy approaches to address the overdose epidemic. Some approaches, like increasing access to naloxone and connecting overdose survivors with evidence-based treatment, have a strong public health foundation and a compelling evidence base. Others, like increasing reliance on punitive criminal justice approaches, have neither. This article examines law and policy changes that are likely to be effective in reducing overdose-related harm as well as those that are likely to increase it.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  45
    Action, Not Rhetoric, Needed to Reverse the Opioid Overdose Epidemic.Corey Davis, Traci Green & Leo Beletsky - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (s1):20-23.
    Despite shifts in rhetoric and some positive movement, Americans with the disease of addiction are still often stigmatized, criminalized, and denied access to evidencebased care. Dramatically reducing the number of lives unnecessarily lost to overdose requires an evidence-based, equity-focused, well-funded, and coordinated response. We present in this brief article evidence-based and promising practices for improving and refocusing the response to this simmering public health crisis. Topics covered include improving clinical decision-making, improving access to non-judgmental evidence-based treatment, investing in comprehensive public (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  13
    Neither Ethical Nor Effective: The False Promise of Involuntary Commitment to Address the Overdose Crisis.Michael S. Sinha, John C. Messinger & Leo Beletsky - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (4):741-743.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark