This essay focuses on the unity of several virtues in pre-Qin Confucians. Confucius maintains the proper application and coherence of such virtues as benevolence, wisdom, trustworthiness, straightforwardness, courage, and firmness. Further, Confucius takes benevolence and nobility as characteristic of human being. Particular attention is paid to the distinction and relationship between virtuous characters and virtuous actions.

Drawing on the core values of western civilization, the author refines the counterparts in Chinese civilization, summarized as four core principles: duty before freedom, obedience before rights, community before individual, and harmony before conflict. Focusing on guoxue or Sinology as the basis of his approach, the author provides detailed explanations of traditional Chinese values. Recent scholars have addressed the concept of guoxue since the modern age, sorting through it and piecing it together, which has produced an extremely abundant range of (...) information. However, given that the concepts and theories involved have been left largely unanalyzed, this book develops a theoretical treatment of them in several important respects. First, it analyzes the mindset of guoxue, examining the dominant ideas and values of the era from which the term "guoxue" arose, focusing on its connection to early changes and trends in society and culture, and distinguishing three key phases of development. Past scholars mainly had in mind the range of objects studied in guoxue when defining it, and what this book underscores is the meaning of guoxue as a modern body of research. Secondly, it assesses several phases in the modern evolution of the body of guoxue research from the beginning to the end of the 20th century, id est, ending with the later phase of the National Heritage movement. Third and lastly, the book explores the various main modes of modern guoxue, which correspond step by step with the evolutionary phases of guoxue research. (shrink)

Ben shu ba zhe xue shi yan jiu, bi jiao zhe xue yan jiu, wen hua wen ti yan jiu he wen xian shi liao yan jiu he wei yi ti, dui Wang Yangming zhe xue de nei rong jin xing le quan mian he shen ru de fen xi, bing dui qi zhe xue de nei rong jin xing le quan mian he shen ru de fen xi, bing dui qi zhe xue de bu tong fa zhan jie duan (...) jin xing le xi zhi de kao cha, li tu cheng xian chu Wang Yangming zhe xue de ji ben xing ge he zheng ti mian mao. (shrink)

该书通过对宋明时代有代表性的二十余位理学思想家的介绍,叙述了宋明理学产生、发展、演变的过程,展示了宋明理学的基本人物、学术派别、概念命题与思想特色等内容。.

Retrospect and prospect for contemporary Chinese thought -- Resolving the tension between tradition and modernity : reflections on the May Fourth cultural tide -- The May Fourth tide and modernity -- Radicalism in the cultural movement of the twentieth century -- Modern Chinese culture and the difficulties of Confucian learning -- Liang Shuming's early view of Oriental and Western culture -- The establishment and development of Feng Youlan's view of culture -- A reflection on the new school of principle and (...) thoughts on modernity -- Confucian thought and the world of modern East Asia -- Confucian ethics and China's modernisation -- East Asian tradition according to modernisation theory -- A sense of predicament and inter-dependency -- Liang Shuming and Max Weber on Chinese culture -- Values, authority, tradition and Chinese philosophy -- The difficulty of undertaking national studies research in the nineties : the problem of the national studies fever and research into traditional culture -- The value and status of traditional Chinese culture. (shrink)

本书是当代国学大师、清华国学研究院院长陈来教授陈来先生近十多年来，在其专著之外撰写的有关古代儒家哲学思想史论文的汇集，从思想与历史两个维度展现了作者的丰富思考。.

“五四”以来，文化激进主义的盛行，使中国思想传统经历了巨大的冲击，中国文化遭遇到前所未有的困境。无庸置疑，“五四”以来的文化批判运动，在促进2O世纪中国走向现代化的伟大工程中发挥了巨大作用。但另一方面 也应看到，主导20世纪中国思想运动的文化激进主义，在推进了革命、变革的同时，也在相当程度上参与制造了现代中国文化的困境，从而使得对这一思潮的反省，成为中华民族面临经济腾飞和文化复兴的重大课题，成为世纪 之交知识分子的当务之急。 本书不仅在宏观上对中国近代思想作了回顾与前瞻，并对“五四时代”和“五四”以来的文化激进主义与文化保守主义进行了详细的分析，特别着重于在文化观上深入检讨文化激进主义的遗产，力图在学理的层面揭示文化激进主 义的偏失。另一方面，以传统与现代、价值理性与工具理性的辩证联结为核心，致力于回应韦伯理论，阐述儒家思想在现代中国社会和现代中国现代化过程中的价值、作用、定位及儒家思想在东亚地区文化乃至世界文化中的意义 和可能的贡献。.

本书收录的儒学研究文章包括:李退溪对朱子的继承和发展、李退溪与奇高峰的四七理气之辩、李退溪心学之研究、李退溪性理学的再研究、宋尤庵与李朝中期的朱子学、李牧隐理学思想简论、林罗山的理学思想、中日韩三国儒 学的历史文化特色、现代化理论视野中的东亚传统。.

本书分为占筮、星象、天道、鬼神、祭祀、经典、礼治、德政、德行、君子十章,主要内容包括:文明起源与历史特性、古代宗教、人文思潮、春秋的思想世界、春秋的龟卜等.

Detailed summary in vernacular field only.

本书从孔子在当代中国的重新登场开始，以面对世界文化而提出新的哲学观念“多元普遍性”为结束，对儒家思想和儒学传统与现代世界与文化的各种关系进行了深入的分析和讨论。.

In this book, the author adopts the methodology of "discussing philosophy by studying history of philosophy". The chapters in the book discuss the essential content of The Study of Renxue Ontology, Ren's development in pre-Qin (before 206BC) and Han period (206BC-220), Ren theories in Song Dynasty (960-1279) and Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). It covers topics ranging from Confucius and Mencius' classic theories to Li Zehou's ontology of emotions as well as the development of Ren in the historical context and its contemporary (...) interpretations. The book develops the theory of Ren and Taoist style of classical Confucianism while critically incorporating modern Chinese philosophical ontology. The resulting philosophical construction incorporates classical Confucian Ren theory and classical Confucian Ren theory and the continuation of and responses to the arguments of modern Chinese philosophy, thus offering a comprehensive and innovative coverage of contemporary Chinese Confucianism. The book combines Chinese contemporary cultural heritage and creative development to promote contemporary Confucianism and harmony between China and the world. (shrink)

本书收录了中国哲学史大家陈来先生近年来关于新儒家一系列研究文章，从对“哲学”概念的理解谈起，详细讨论了20世纪中国哲学方面具有创造性的新儒家代表人物如熊十力、马一浮、梁漱溟、冯友兰等学者对儒学的创新和 发明。.

本书是研究现代中国哲学的专著, 可说是一部现代哲学史. 全书以梁漱溟、熊十力、冯友兰等人为主干, 以心学和理学的交错为中心线索, 分析了这些现代中国哲学家在20世纪遇到的问题及其理论思考和努力.

本书主要内容包括:史料困境的突破与儒家系谱的重建;郭店竹简《性自命出》篇初探;竹帛《五行》为子思、孟子所作论;竹简《五行》分经解论:《五行》章句简注;竹简《五行》与子思思想研究等.

本书的内容, 是属于中国哲学思想史上的"道学"与"心学"的考论研究, 故最初拟命名为"道学与心学". 此一主题, 如果用日本学界习用的说法, 也可名为"朱子学与阳明学". 考虑到此种题目的著述所在多有, 故定今名, 以示区别.

中国哲学史创刊于1980年,已经成为展示中国哲学史研究最新成果的平台.为了总结四十年来走过的历程,更好地推进中国哲学史的研究,中国哲学史编辑部从四十年来发表于中国哲学史的学术论文中精选了一百六十余篇, 分为五卷,力图能较为全面地反映中国哲学史研究界过去四十年的整体研究面貌,也为进一步推进中国哲学史的研究,实现中华优秀传统文化的创造性转化和创新性发展提供借鉴与启发.

No matter what the original meaning of “ Ru ” was, looking at it from the perspective of the history of philosophy, the image of “ Ru ” as portrayed by other schools in the Warring States period was infused with the characteristics of Confucianism of that time. The self-understanding of Warring States Confucians expressed by their employment of the character “ Ru ” clearly displayed Ru ’s character as well as the main points of the Ru school, namely Confucianism. (...) In particular, the words and thoughts of Xunzi, the great Confucian master, on “ Ru ”, epitomize Pre-Qin Confucian’s understanding and expectations of themselves, and also reflect the Confucian new pursuit in facing the age of the unification of Qin. (shrink)