It is with real interest that one sees a new book appear by one of Europe's leading philosophers, especially a volume that deals strictly with political theory and politics. While it is true that this often engaged philosopher has continually published both professional and newspaper pieces dealing with a variety of social questions and topics, it is especially with this volume that one has the pleasure of examining the mature richness of his political reflections and is able to more fully (...) understand the origins of his thinking. Here, then, is his statement from writings primarily of the 1980s and early 1990s. (shrink)

"We need a philosophy of both history and spirit to deal with the problems we touch upon here. Yet we would be unduly rigorous if we were to wait for perfectly elaborated principles before speaking philosophically of politics." Thus Merleau-Ponty introduces _Adventures of the Dialectic,_ his study of Marxist philosophy and thought. In this study, containing chapters on Weber, Lukacs, Lenin, Sartre, and Marx himself, Merleau-Ponty investigates and attempts to go beyond the dialectic.

Zaner, R. M. Eidos and science.--Tiryakian, E. A. Durkheim and Husserl.--Ricoeur, P. Can there be a scientific concept of ideology?--Natanson, M. The problem of anonymity in the thought of Alfred Schutz. -- Dallmayr, F. R. Genesis and validation of social knowledge.

This is a paperback second edition of one of the more highly esteemed English language works on Wilhelm Dilthey's philosophy as a whole. The work was originally published in 1975. What is new here is the "Afterword to the 2nd Edition." It was a pleasure to reread the entire work, noting the very careful scholarship, the excellent citations from both the original German and the English translations, the extremely helpful footnotes, the first-rate index and the extensive bibliography. This edition would (...) have been still better had the bibliography been brought up through 1992 publications. Simply in reading through this work it is easy to see how Makkreel on Dilthey became the measure for English language works nearly twenty years ago. (shrink)

Another book on Marcuse... is it really necessary? Few things in life are necessary, but this particular work is certainly very helpful. It is written by one of France's more important, younger, social philosophers who is more than sufficiently acquainted with the cultural, literary, and historical background to produce a high quality, scholarly work of this sort. For some years Raulet has been a codirector of the annual Praxis gathering in Dubrovnik and the director of the Weimar Cultural Study Group (...) at the Maison des sciences de l'homme in Paris. His previous writings in a variety of languages show both a wide breath of interest and a serious understanding of the European intellectual movements from the eighteenth century to the present. (shrink)

This is the second of a three volume collection dealing with Ricoeur's views on a variety of authors and subjects. In volume one he dealt with political philosophy. Volume two includes essays dating in the extremes from 1948 through 1992. Under the general headings of Existential Thinkers and Poetics, Semiotics, and Rhetoric, he speaks to concerns he has found and admired in a number of French and foreign philosophers. While the number of thinkers is wide, the subjects are carefully grouped.

It is always fun to observe the wheel being reinvented. More often than not in philosophy this happens when young philosophers ignore the history of their field and attempt to come to terms with something not included in the latest journal articles. In this case, the end result is of some interest. The author, in stressing the relationship between fiction and reality, realizes that reality cannot be true without a moral aspect. In wrestling with this moral aspect the author quite (...) rightly turns to ethics, culture and education in an attempt to allow for an account of our moral stance and to introduce it into practice. A very tricky, but a very worthwhile, project. (shrink)

In this paper I wish to examine the position of Camus regarding social change, namely his concepts of rebellion and revolution. I in no way question his well-deserved status as a major twentieth-century French writer, nor do I wish to suggest that he may have been someone caught in a Sartrean notion of 'bad faith.' I am concerned with what one might call his theory of social action. I do wish to assert that Camus was a good man who seriously (...) wrestled with the events of his time. Yet his claims on behalf of suffering humanity, while honest, are not sufficient when faced with complex social issues. That his move toward the right that today might well be taken for a supposed liberalism was undoubtedly bound up with his continued misunderstanding of the dialectic of history. (shrink)