11 found
Order:
See also
Jonathan Fuqua
Conception Seminary College
  1.  28
    Ethical Mooreanism.Jonathan Fuqua - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6943-6965.
    In this paper I lay out, argue for, and defend ethical Mooreanism. In essence, the view says that some moral propositions are Moorean propositions and thus are epistemically superior to the conjunctions of the premises of skeptical arguments to the contrary. In Sect. 1 I explain Mooreanism and then ethical Mooreanism. In Sect. 2 I argue for ethical Mooreanism by noting a number of important epistemic parities that hold between certain moral truths and standard Moorean facts. In Sect. 3 I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  16
    Metaethical Mooreanism and Evolutionary Debunking.Jonathan Fuqua - 2018 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 92:271-284.
    In this paper I will apply the Moorean response to external world skepticism to moral skepticism, specifically to the evolutionary debunking argument against morality. I begin, in section 1, with a discussion of Mooreanism. In section 2, I proceed to a discussion of metaethical Mooreanism, which is the view that some moral facts are Moorean facts. In section 3 I apply metaethical Mooreanism to the evolutionary debunking argument against morality. If the arguments of the paper hold up it will turn (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  95
    Faith and Reason: Philosophers Explain Their Turn to Catholicism.Brian Besong & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.) - 2019 - San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
  4. Dogmatism Without Mooreanism.Jonathan Fuqua - 2017 - American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2):195-211.
    One common way of attacking dogmatism is to attack its alleged Mooreanism. The thought is that dogmatism includes (or perhaps entails) Mooreanism, but that Mooreanism is false and thus so is dogmatism. One way of responding to this charge is to defend Mooreanism. Another strategy is to articulate a version of dogmatism without Mooreanism. This paper is an attempt to articulate the latter view.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  20
    An Ecumenical Mooreanism.Jonathan Fuqua - 2021 - Philosophia 49 (5):2019-2040.
    The purpose of this paper is to get clear on how we should think about Mooreanism. I will argue that Mooreanism is best understood as a metaphilosophical response to skepticism rather than a particular position on specialized debates in first-order epistemology. This ecumenical understanding of Mooreanism implies that a broad array of epistemologists is free to be Moorean. In Sect. 2 I discuss several non-Moorean responses to skepticism. In Sect. 3 I provide an exposition of Mooreanism itself. In Sect. 4 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Dunn, Charles W. Faith, Freedom and the Future: Religion in American Political Culture. [REVIEW]Jonathan Fuqua - 2005 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 17 (1-2):189-190.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology.John Greco, Tyler Dalton McNabb & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.) - forthcoming - Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  17
    Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 9, Edited by Russ Shafer-Landau. [REVIEW]Jonathan Fuqua - 2018 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (1):108-111.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  18
    "Review of" Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments". [REVIEW]Jonathan Fuqua - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (2):17.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  10
    Courting Epistemology: Legal Scholarship, the Courts, and the Rationality of Religious Belief.Jonathan Fuqua & Shannon Holzer - 2014 - Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 3 (2):195-211.
    What we here show is two-fold. First, there is in certain sectors of the legal community a trend to pronounce negatively on the epistemic credentials of religious belief: many hold that religious belief as such is simply irrational. Our second claim is simply that religious belief need not be irrational: it is perfectly possible for religious believers to have epistemically justified religious beliefs. We discuss here several implications of our two-fold claim. The most important of these is simply that religious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  1
    Review of Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments, by C. Stephen Evans. [REVIEW]Jonathan Fuqua - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (2):611-616.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark