18 found
Order:
  1.  53
    Addressing Dual Agency: Getting Specific About the Expectations of Professionalism.Jon C. Tilburt - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):29-36.
    Professionalism requires that physicians uphold the best interests of patients while simultaneously insuring just use of health care resources. Current articulations of these obligations like the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Physician Charter do not reconcile how these obligations fit together when they conflict. This is the problem of dual agency. The most common ways of dealing with dual agency: “bunkering”—physicians act as though societal cost issues are not their problem; “bailing”—physicians assume that they are merely agents of society (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  2.  11
    Chickens & Eggs, Pigs and Their Lipstick: The Trouble with Asking Principlism to Do Too Much.Jon C. Tilburt - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (10):13-14.
    Principlism is simple. Four intuitive ideas, creating order out of moral chaos, at least categorizing considerations for better deliberation over right and wrong, good and bad, in a modern, plurali...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  8
    An “Implementation Mindset” in Normative Bioethics Will Have Unintended Consequences.Joel E. Pacyna & Jon C. Tilburt - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (4):76-78.
    Volume 20, Issue 4, May 2020, Page 76-78.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  25
    Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician “rationing”.Jon C. Tilburt & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 12:5.
    Important discussions about limiting care based on professional judgment often devolve into heated debates over the place of physicians in bedside rationing. Politics, loaded rhetoric, and ideological caricature from both sides of the rationing debate obscure precise points of disagreement and consensus, and hinder critical dialogue around the obligations and boundaries of professional practice. We propose a way forward by reframing the rationing conversation, distinguishing between the scale of the decision and its context avoiding the word “rationing.” We propose to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  26
    Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician “rationing”.Jon C. Tilburt & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2017 12:1 12 (1):5.
    Important discussions about limiting care based on professional judgment often devolve into heated debates over the place of physicians in bedside rationing. Politics, loaded rhetoric, and ideological caricature from both sides of the rationing debate obscure precise points of disagreement and consensus, and hinder critical dialogue around the obligations and boundaries of professional practice. We propose a way forward by reframing the rationing conversation, distinguishing between the scale of the decision and its context avoiding the word “rationing.” We propose to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  15
    Physician Responsibility to Discuss Palliative Unproven Therapies With Out-of-Option Patients.Omar Kawam, Jon C. Tilburt & Zubin Master - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):31-33.
    We agree with Lynch et al. that patients with chronic diseases and Band-Aid treatments are unlikely to benefit from a version of Operation Warp Speed or by deprioritizing standards of scientific ev...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. [REVIEW]Adam Nishimura, Jantey Carey, Patricia J. Erwin, Jon C. Tilburt, M. Hassan Murad & Jennifer B. McCormick - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):28.
    Obtaining informed consent is a cornerstone of biomedical research, yet participants comprehension of presented information is often low. The most effective interventions to improve understanding rates have not been identified.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  8.  30
    Spanning our differences: moral psychology, physician beliefs, and the practice of medicine.Ryan M. Antiel, Katherine M. Humeniuk & Jon C. Tilburt - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9:17.
    Moral pluralism is the norm in contemporary society. Even the best philosophical arguments rarely persuade moral opponents who differ at a foundational level. This has been vividly illustrated in contemporary debates in bioethics surrounding contentious issues such as abortion and euthanasia. It is readily apparent that bioethics discourse lacks an empirical explanation for the broad differences about various topics in bioethics and health policy. In recent years, social and cognitive psychology has generated novel approaches for defining basic differences in moral (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  18
    Introduction: Overhearing Strange Voices Next Door.Jon C. Tilburt - 2014 - Christian Bioethics 20 (1):1-4.
  10.  31
    Evidence‐based medicine beyond the bedside: keeping an eye on context.Jon C. Tilburt - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):721-725.
  11.  65
    How do doctors use information in real‐time? A qualitative study of internal medicine resident precepting.Jon C. Tilburt, Susan D. Goold, Nazema Siddiqui & Rajesh S. Mangrulkar - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):772-780.
  12.  10
    Ethics Education in U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools: A National Survey of Medical School Deans and Ethics Course Directors.Chad M. Teven, Michael A. Howard, Timothy J. Ingall, Elisabeth S. Lim, Yu-Hui H. Chang, Lyndsay A. Kandi, Jon C. Tilburt, Ellen C. Meltzer & Nicholas R. Jarvis - 2023 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 34 (4):328-341.
    Purpose: to characterize ethics course content, structure, resources, pedagogic methods, and opinions among academic administrators and course directors at U.S. medical schools. Method: An online questionnaire addressed to academic deans and ethics course directors identified by medical school websites was emailed to 157 Association of American Medical Colleges member medical schools in two successive waves in early 2022. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize responses. Results: Representatives from 61 (39%) schools responded. Thirty-two (52%) respondents were course directors; 26 (43%) were (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  21
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Addressing Dual Agency: Getting Specific About the Expectations of Professionalism”.Jon C. Tilburt - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (10):4-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  83
    Feeding Tubes and Health Care Service Utilization in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Benefits and Limits to a Retrospective, Multicenter Study Using Big Data.Keith M. Swetz, Stephanie M. Peterson, Lindsey R. Sangaralingham, Ryan T. Hurt, Shannon M. Dunlay, Nilay D. Shah & Jon C. Tilburt - 2017 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 54:004695801773242.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  68
    The moral psychology of rationing among physicians: the role of harm and fairness intuitions in physician objections to cost-effectiveness and cost-containment.Ryan M. Antiel, Farr A. Curlin, Katherine M. James & Jon C. Tilburt - 2013 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:13.
    Physicians vary in their moral judgments about health care costs. Social intuitionism posits that moral judgments arise from gut instincts, called “moral foundations.” The objective of this study was to determine if “harm” and “fairness” intuitions can explain physicians’ judgments about cost-containment in U.S. health care and using cost-effectiveness data in practice, as well as the relative importance of those intuitions compared to “purity”, “authority” and “ingroup” in cost-related judgments.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  7
    Curare Aude–Caring for Patients, with Them.Jon C. Tilburt, Victor M. Montori & Ian Hargraves - 2020 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 31 (1):79-82.
    We reflect on Dr. Iserson’s article in this journal, in which he suggests that clinicians must “shove” patients towards appropriate care. While recognizing that overt clinical guidance is part of care, we suggest that its use should be tempered by the guidance’s responsiveness to the human and emotional experience of each patient.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  71
    Do we practice what we preach? A qualitative assessment of resident–preceptor interactions for adherence to evidence‐based practice.Jon C. Tilburt, Rajesh S. Mangrulkar, Susan Dorr Goold, Nazema Y. Siddiqui & Joseph A. Carrese - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):780-784.
  18.  17
    Owning Medical Professionalism.Jon C. Tilburt & Richard R. Sharp - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark