18 found
Order:
Disambiguations
John P. Gluck [17]John P. Gluck Jr [1]
  1.  38
    Stakeholder Opinions and Ethical Perspectives Support Complete Disclosure of Incidental Findings in MRI Research.John P. Phillips, Caitlin Cole, John P. Gluck, Jody M. Shoemaker, Linda E. Petree, Deborah L. Helitzer, Ronald M. Schrader & Mark T. Holdsworth - 2015 - Ethics and Behavior 25 (4):332-350.
    How far does a researcher’s responsibility extend when an incidental finding is identified? Balancing pertinent ethical principles such as beneficence, respect for persons, and duty to rescue is not always straightforward, particularly in neuroimaging research where empirical data that might help guide decision making are lacking. We conducted a systematic survey of perceptions and preferences of 396 investigators, research participants, and Institutional Review Board members at our institution. Using the partial entrustment model as described by Richardson, we argue that our (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  28
    The Ethical Challenges of Animal Research.Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):391-406.
  3.  62
    Where Are We in the Justification of Research Involving Chimpanzees?Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (3):211-242.
    On December 15, 2011, a final report was issued by the Committee on the Use of Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which had been convened by the U. S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) in collaboration with National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies. Within a month of its release, this report was designated by Wired Science one of the “top scientific discoveries of 2011” (Wired Science Staff 2011). The ad hoc Committee responsible for this report was formed at (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  75
    Rethinking the ethics of research involving nonhuman animals: introduction.Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):91-96.
    In the relatively short time since 2006—when Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics published an issue on moral issues relevant to the use of nonhuman animals in research [1]—significant changes have occurred for nonhuman animals in many quarters. Public sentiment, new policy initiatives, and scientific studies of nonhuman animals’ capacities have all influenced the ways in which nonhuman animals are perceived and treated in research. Today, a large body of information is available for use in decision making about the acceptability of using (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  36
    The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Choice.F. Barbara Orlans, Tom L. Beauchamp, Rebecca Dresser, David B. Morton & John P. Gluck - 1998 - Oxford University Press USA.
    The first set of case studies on animal use, this volume offers a thorough, up-to-date exploration of the moral issues related to animal welfare. Its main purpose is to examine how far it is ethically justifiable to harm animals in order to benefit mankind. An excellent introduction provides a framework for the cases and sets the background of philosophical and moral concepts underlying the subject. Sixteen original, previously unpublished essays cover controversies associated with the human use of animals in a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  6. Animals in biomedical research: The undermining effect of the rhetoric of the besieged.John P. Gluck & Steven R. Kubacki - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):157 – 173.
    It is correctly asserted that the intensity of the current debate over the use of animals in biomedical research is unprecedented. The extent of expressed animosity and distrust has stunned many researchers. In response, researchers have tended to take a strategic defensive posture, which involves the assertion of several abstract positions that serve to obstruct resolution of the debate. Those abstractions include the notions that the animal protection movement is trivial and purely anti-intellectual in scope, that all science is good (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  7.  72
    Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research.Franklin G. Miller, John P. Gluck Jr & David Wendler - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):235-251.
    Debriefing is a standard ethical requirement for human research involving the use of deception. Little systematic attention, however, has been devoted to explaining the ethical significance of debriefing and the specific ethical functions that it serves. In this article, we develop an account of debriefing as a tool of moral accountability for the prima facie wrong of deception. Specifically, we contend that debriefing should include a responsibility to promote transparency by explaining the deception and its rationale, to provide an apology (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  8.  46
    Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research.Jennifer J. Eldridge & John P. Gluck - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):239 – 256.
    Although gender differences in attitudes toward animal research have been reported in the literature for some time, exploration into the nature of these differences has received less attention. This article examines gender differences in responses to a survey of attitudes toward the use of animals in research. The survey was completed by college students and consisted of items intended to tap different issues related to the animal research debate. Results indicated that women were more likely than men to support tenets (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  9.  37
    Moving beyond the welfare standard of psychological well-being for nonhuman primates: the case of chimpanzees.John P. Gluck - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):105-116.
    Since 1985, the US Animal Welfare Act and Public Health Service policy have required that researchers using nonhuman primates in biomedical and behavioral research develop a plan “for a physical environment adequate to promote the psychological well-being of primates.” In pursuing this charge, housing attributes such as social companionship, opportunities to express species-typical behavior, suitable space for expanded locomotor activity, and nonstressful relationships with laboratory personnel are dimensions that have dominated the discussion. Regulators were careful not to direct a specific (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  33
    Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Debriefing.Alfredo S. Aragon, John P. Gluck & Janet L. Brody - 2000 - Ethics and Behavior 10 (1):13-25.
    In a broad-based study of experiences in psychological research, 65 undergraduates participating in a wide range of psychological experiments were interviewed in depth. Overall findings demonstrated that participants hold varying views, with only 32% of participants characterizing their experiences as completely positive. Participants' descriptions of their debriefing experiences suggest substantial variability in the content, format, and general quality of debriefing practices. Just over 40% of the debriefing experiences were viewed favorably. Positive debriefing experiences were described as including a thorough explanation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11. FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals.John P. Gluck & Mark T. Holdsworth - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):393-402.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Regulation of Genetically Engineered AnimalsJohn P. Gluck (bio) and Mark T. Holdsworth (bio)On 18 September 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a draft set of guidelines for those involved in developing genetically engineered animals with heritable recombinant DNA (rDNA) constructs and is requesting comment from industry and the public about their content. The document does not impose new regulations but details (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  32
    By Author.David M. Craig, Robert I. Field, Ar Caplan, John P. Gluck, Mark T. Holdsworth, Bert Gordijn, L. Norbert, Henk A. M. J. ten Have, Norbert L. Steinkamp & Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):405-407.
  13.  35
    Deception in Psychological Research.John P. Gluck & Stephen Hahn-Smith - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (4):386-388.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Deception in Psychological ResearchJohn P. Gluck and Stephen Hahn-SmithMadam: In the March 1995 issue of the KIEJ, Sissela Bok adds meaningfully to her consistent and important analysis of the harms associated with deception in biomedical and behavioral research. She reminds us that investigator and review committee domination of the analysis of costs and benefits deprives the prospective research subjects of the opportunity to apply their unique sense of values (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  83
    Harry F. Harlow and animal research: Reflection on the ethical paradox.John P. Gluck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):149 – 161.
    With respect to the ethical debate about the treatment of animals in biomedical and behavioral research, Harry F. Harlow represents a paradox. On the one hand, his work on monkey cognition and social development fostered a view of the animals as having rich subjective lives filled with intention and emotion. On the other, he has been criticized for the conduct of research that seemed to ignore the ethical implications of his own discoveries. The basis of this contradiction is discussed and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  28
    Institutional animal care and use committees: A flawed paradigm or work in progress?John P. Gluck & F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):329 – 336.
    In his challenging article, Steneck (1997) criticized the creation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) system established by the 1985 amendments to the Animal Welfare Act. He saw the IACUC review and approval of biomedical and behavioral research with animals as an unnecessary "reassignment" of duties from existing animal care programs to IACUC committees. He argued that the committees are unable to do the work expected of them for basically three reasons: (a) the membership lacks the expertise (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  31
    Searching for Ethical Consistency in Our Lives with Animals.John P. Gluck - 2012 - Society and Animals 20 (3):311-313.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  35
    Steps in the ethical analysis of learned helplessness.John P. Gluck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):186 – 188.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Ralph H. Lutts The Wild Animal Story Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998, 302 pp. Howard Lyman Mad Cowboy. [REVIEW]Randy Malamud, Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, Ollin Eugene Myers Jr, Barbara Orlans, Tom L. Beauchamp, Rebecca Dresser, David B. Morton, John P. Gluck, Kenneth D. Pimple & F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7:2.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark