Order:
Disambiguations
John Nisbet [19]John D. Nisbet [3]John Ferguson Nisbet [2]
  1.  12
    The impact of research on educational studies.Patricia Broadfoot & John Nisbet - 1981 - British Journal of Educational Studies 29 (2):115-122.
  2.  14
    The Rural Community and the Small School.Diana Forsythe, Ian Carter, G. A. Mackay, John Nisbet, Peter Sadler & John Sewel - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (3):286-287.
  3.  16
    Social Implications of the 1947 Scottish Mental SurveyFamily Environment. A Direct Effect of Family Size on Intelligence.Adam Curle & John D. Nisbet - 1954 - British Journal of Educational Studies 2 (2):178.
  4.  65
    Dewey in Britain.John Darling & John Nisbet - 2000 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 19 (1):39-52.
    Dewey's ideas were slower to be accepted in Britain than elsewhere. Reasonsfor this are considered under four headings: pedagogical, epistemological,social and political. Of these, only the pedagogical ideas elicited a modicumof support in the first half of the century. Developments after 1960,however, led to widespread implementation of Dewey's principles mainly inthe primary education sector.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  13
    Scottish Education Looks Ahead.S. Leslie Hunter & John Nisbet - 1970 - British Journal of Educational Studies 18 (1):96.
  6.  8
    Contrary imaginations: a psychological study of the english schoolboy.John Nisbet - 1966 - The Eugenics Review 58 (4):221.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  11
    Intelligence and family size, 1949-56.John D. Nisbet - 1958 - The Eugenics Review 49 (4):201.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  39
    Mixed or Single-Sexed School?John Nisbet & R. R. Dale - 1970 - British Journal of Educational Studies 18 (1):91.
  9.  10
    Studies in individual differences: the search for intelligence.John Nisbet - 1964 - The Eugenics Review 55 (4):232.