103 found
Order:
Disambiguations
John L. Pollock [111]John Leslie Pollock [1]
  1. (1 other version)Contemporary theories of knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1986 - London: Hutchinson.
    This new edition of the classic Contemporary Theories of Knowledge has been significantly updated to include analyses of the recent literature in epistemology.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   561 citations  
  2. Knowledge and Justification.John L. Pollock - 1974 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by John Pollock.
    Princeton University Press, 1974. This book is out of print, but can be downloaded as a pdf file (5 MB).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   181 citations  
  3. Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
    There was a long tradition in philosophy according to which good reasoning had to be deductively valid. However, that tradition began to be questioned in the 1960’s, and is now thoroughly discredited. What caused its downfall was the recognition that many familiar kinds of reasoning are not deductively valid, but clearly confer justification on their conclusions. Here are some simple examples.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   366 citations  
  4.  65
    How to Build a Person: A Prolegomenon.John L. Pollock - 1989 - MIT Press.
    Pollock describes an exciting theory of rationality and its partial implementation in OSCAR, a computer system whose descendants will literally be persons.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   101 citations  
  5.  90
    Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction.John L. Pollock - 1990 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
    In this book Pollock deals with the subject of probabilistic reasoning, making general philosophical sense of objective probabilities and exploring their ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   89 citations  
  6. Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making.John L. Pollock - 2006 - , US: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Pollock.
    The objective of this book is to produce a theory of rational decision making for realistically resource-bounded agents. My interest is not in “What should I do if I were an ideal agent?”, but rather, “What should I do given that I am who I am, with all my actual cognitive limitations?” The book has three parts. Part One addresses the question of where the values come from that agents use in rational decision making. The most comon view among philosophers (...)
  7. The foundations of philosophical semantics.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Princeton University Press. Edited by Lloyd Humberstone.
    Princeton University Press, 984. This book is out of print, but can be downloaded as a pdf file (3.9 MB).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  8.  22
    How to reason defeasibly.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 57 (1):1-42.
  9.  56
    Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism.Richard Fumerton, John L. Pollock, Alvin Plantinga & Laurence BonJour - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The contributions in this volume make an important effort to resurrect a rather old fashioned form of foundationalism. They defend the position that there are some beliefs that are justified, and are not themselves justified by any further beliefs. This epistemic foundationalism has been the subject of rigorous attack by a wide range of theorists in recent years, leading to the impression that foundationalism is a thing of the past. DePaul argues that it is precisely the volume and virulence of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  10. Reliability and Justified Belief.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):103 - 114.
    Reliabilist theories propose to analyse epistemic justification in terms of reliability. This paper argues that if we pay attention to the details of probability theory we find that there is no concept of reliability that can possibly play the role required by reliabilist theories. A distinction is drawn between the general reliability of a process and the single case reliability of an individual belief, And it is argued that neither notion can serve the reliabilist adequately.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  11.  17
    Justification and defeat.John L. Pollock - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 67 (2):377-407.
  12. Epistemic norms.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Synthese 71 (1):61 - 95.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  13. Epistemology and Probability.John L. Pollock - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):65.
    Probability is sometimes regarded as a universal panacea for epistemology. It has been supposed that the rationality of belief is almost entirely a matter of probabilities. Unfortunately, those philosophers who have thought about this most extensively have tended to be probability theorists first, and epistemologists only secondarily. In my estimation, this has tended to make them insensitive to the complexities exhibited by epistemic justification. In this paper I propose to turn the tables. I begin by laying out some rather simple (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  14.  84
    ``Defeasible Reasoning with Variable Degrees of Justification".John L. Pollock - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence 133 (1-2):233-282.
    The question addressed in this paper is how the degree of justification of a belief is determined. A conclusion may be supported by several different arguments, the arguments typically being defeasible, and there may also be arguments of varying strengths for defeaters for some of the supporting arguments. What is sought is a way of computing the “on sum” degree of justification of a conclusion in terms of the degrees of justification of all relevant premises and the strengths of all (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  15. Language and thought.John L. Pollock - 1982 - Princeton University Press. Edited by Lloyd Humberstone.
    Princeton University Press, 1982. This book is out of print, but can be downloaded as a pdf file (5 MB).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  16. Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
    An argument is self-defeating when it contains defeaters for some of its own defeasible lines. It is shown that the obvious rules for defeat among arguments do not handle self-defeating arguments correctly. It turns out that they constitute a pervasive phenomenon that threatens to cripple defeasible reasoning, leading to almost all defeasible reasoning being defeated by unexpected interactions with self-defeating arguments. This leads to some important changes in the general theory of defeasible reasoning.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  17.  57
    Epistemology and probability.John L. Pollock - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):231-252.
    Probability is sometimes regarded as a universal panacea for epistemology. It has been supposed that the rationality of belief is almost entirely a matter of probabilities. Unfortunately, those philosophers who have thought about this most extensively have tended to be probability theorists first, and epistemologists only secondarily. In my estimation, this has tended to make them insensitive to the complexities exhibited by epistemic justification. In this paper I propose to turn the tables. I begin by laying out some rather simple (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  18.  74
    How do you maximize expectation value?John L. Pollock - 1983 - Noûs 17 (3):409-421.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  19. The paradox of the preface.John L. Pollock - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):246-258.
    In a number of recent papers I have been developing the theory of "nomic probability," which is supposed to be the kind of probability involved in statistical laws of nature. One of the main principles of this theory is an acceptance rule explicitly designed to handle the lottery paradox. This paper shows that the rule can also handle the paradox of the preface. The solution proceeds in part by pointing out a surprising connection between the paradox of the preface and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  20. Rational Choice and Action Omnipotence.John L. Pollock - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):1.
    A theory of rational choice is a theory of how an agent should, rationally, go about deciding what actions to perform at any given time. For example, I may want to decide whether to go to a movie this evening or stay home and read a book. The actions between which we want to choose are perfectly ordinary actions, and the presumption is that to make such a decision we should attend to the likely consequences of our decision. It is (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  21. A refined theory of counterfactuals.John L. Pollock - 1981 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 10 (2):239 - 266.
  22. Criteria and our knowledge of the material world.John L. Pollock - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (1):28-60.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  23. (1 other version)Vision, knowledge, and the mystery link.John L. Pollock & Iris Oved - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):309-351.
    Imagine yourself sitting on your front porch, sipping your morning coffee and admiring the scene before you. You see trees, houses, people, automobiles; you see a cat running across the road, and a bee buzzing among the flowers. You see that the flowers are yellow, and blowing in the wind. You see that the people are moving about, many of them on bicycles. You see that the houses are painted different colors, mostly earth tones, and most are one-story but a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  24.  47
    Rational cognition in Oscar.John L. Pollock - 1999 - Agent Theories.
    Stuart Russell [14] describes rational agents as --œthose that do the right thing--�. The problem of designing a rational agent then becomes the problem of figuring out what the right thing is. There are two approaches to the latter problem, depending upon the kind of agent we want to build. On the one hand, anthropomorphic agents are those that can help human beings rather directly in their intellectual endeavors. These endeavors consist of decision making and data processing. An agent that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  25. The 'possible worlds' analysis of counterfactuals.John L. Pollock - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (6):469 - 476.
  26. Perceptual knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (3):287-319.
  27.  45
    Four Kinds of Conditionals.John L. Pollock - 1975 - American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (1):51 - 59.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  28.  69
    A theory of direct inference.John L. Pollock - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (1):29-95.
  29.  98
    New foundations for practical reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (2):113-144.
    Practical reasoning aims at deciding what actions to perform in light of the goals a rational agent possesses. This has been a topic of interest in both philosophy and artificial intelligence, but these two disciplines have produced very different models of practical reasoning. The purpose of this paper is to examine each model in light of the other and produce a unified model adequate for the purposes of both disciplines and superior to the standard models employed by either.The philosophical (decision-theoretic) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  30.  17
    (1 other version)The logical foundations of goal-regression planning in autonomous agents.John L. Pollock - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence 106 (2):267-334.
  31.  15
    VI. Formal Semantics.John L. Pollock - 1984 - In The foundations of philosophical semantics. Princeton University Press. pp. 172-229.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  32.  40
    Thinking about an Object.John L. Pollock - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):487-500.
  33. Nomic probability.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):177-204.
  34. A solution to the problem of induction.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Noûs 18 (3):423-461.
  35. Causal probability.John L. Pollock - 2002 - Synthese 132 (1-2):143 - 185.
    Examples growing out of the Newcomb problem have convinced many people that decision theory should proceed in terms of some kind of causal probability. I endorse this view and define and investigate a variety of causal probability. My definition is related to Skyrms' definition, but proceeds in terms of objective probabilities rather than subjective probabilities and avoids taking causal dependence as a primitive concept.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  36. What am I? Virtual machines and the mind/body problem.John L. Pollock - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):237–309.
    When your word processor or email program is running on your computer, this creates a "virtual machine” that manipulates windows, files, text, etc. What is this virtual machine, and what are the virtual objects it manipulates? Many standard arguments in the philosophy of mind have exact analogues for virtual machines and virtual objects, but we do not want to draw the wild metaphysical conclusions that have sometimes tempted philosophers in the philosophy of mind. A computer file is not made of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37.  2
    Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification.John L. Pollock - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):7-22.
  38.  31
    Introduction to symbolic logic.John L. Pollock - 1969 - New York,: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  39. Plans And Decisions.John L. Pollock - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (2):79-107.
    Counterexamples are constructed for classical decision theory, turning on the fact that actions must often be chosen in groups rather than individually, i.e., the objects of rational choice are plans. It is argued that there is no way to define optimality for plans that makes the finding of optimal plans the desideratum of rational decision-making. An alternative called “locally global planning” is proposed as a replacement for classical decision theory. Decision-making becomes a non-terminating process without a precise target rather than (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  40. A theory of moral reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1986 - Ethics 96 (3):506-523.
  41.  70
    Foundations for direct inference.John L. Pollock - 1994 - Theory and Decision 17 (3):221-255.
  42.  36
    How to build a person: The physical basis for mentality.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Philosophical Perspectives 1:109-154.
  43.  74
    What Is an Epistemological Problem?John L. Pollock - 1968 - American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (3):183 - 190.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  44. (1 other version)So You Think You Exist? — In Defense of Nolipsism.Jenann Ismael & John L. Pollock - unknown
    Human beings think of themselves in terms of a privileged non-descriptive designator — a mental “I”. Such thoughts are called “de se” thoughts. The mind/body problem is the problem of deciding what kind of thing I am, and it can be regarded as arising from the fact that we think of ourselves non-descriptively. Why do we think of ourselves in this way? We investigate the functional role of “I” (and also “here” and “now”) in cognition, arguing that the use of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  45.  41
    The building of Oscar.John L. Pollock - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:315-344.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  46.  45
    The Phylogeny of Rationality.John L. Pollock - 1993 - Cognitive Science 17 (4):563-588.
    A rational agent has beliefs reflecting the state of its environment, and likes or dislikes Its situation. When it finds the world not entirely to Its liking, it tries to change that. We can, accordingly, evaluate a system of cognition in terms of its probable success in bringing about situations that are to the agent's liking. In doing this we are viewing practical reasoning from “the design stance.” It is argued that a considerable amount of the structure of rationality can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  47. Irrationality and cognition.John L. Pollock - 2008 - In Quentin Smith, Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press.
    The strategy of this paper is to throw light on rational cognition and epistemic justification by examining irrationality. Epistemic irrationality is possible because we are reflexive cognizers, able to reason about and redirect some aspects of our own cognition. One consequence of this is that one cannot give a theory of epistemic rationality or epistemic justification without simultaneously giving a theory of practical rationality. A further consequence is that practical irrationality can affect our epistemic cognition. I argue that practical irrationality (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  48. Irrationality and cognition.John L. Pollock - 2008 - In Quentin Smith, Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press.
    The strategy of this paper is to throw light on rational cognition and epistemic justification by examining irrationality. Epistemic irrationality is possible because we are reflexive cognizers, able to reason about and redirect some aspects of our own cognition. One consequence of this is that one cannot give a theory of epistemic rationality or epistemic justification without simultaneously giving a theory of practical rationality. A further consequence is that practical irrationality can affect our epistemic cognition. I argue that practical irrationality (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Reasoning about change and persistence: A solution to the frame problem.John L. Pollock - 1997 - Noûs 31 (2):143-169.
  50.  61
    Laying the Raven to rest: A discussion of Hempel and the paradoxes of confirmation.John L. Pollock - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (20):747-754.
1 — 50 / 103