19 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Joel I. Friedman [11]Joel Friedman [5]Joëlle Y. Friedman [2]Joel Irwin Friedman [1]
Joel D. Friedman [1]
  1.  59
    Was Spinoza fooled by the ontological argument?Joel I. Friedman - 1982 - Philosophia 11 (3-4):307-344.
  2.  56
    An overview of spinoza'sehics.Joel I. Friedman - 1978 - Synthese 37 (1):67 - 106.
  3. Modal Platonism: an Easy Way to Avoid Ontological Commitment to Abstract Entities.Joel I. Friedman - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):227-273.
    Modal Platonism utilizes "weak" logical possibility, such that it is logically possible there are abstract entities, and logically possible there are none. Modal Platonism also utilizes a non-indexical actuality operator. Modal Platonism is the EASY WAY, neither reductionist nor eliminativist, but embracing the Platonistic language of abstract entities while eliminating ontological commitment to them. Statement of Modal Platonism. Any consistent statement B ontologically committed to abstract entities may be replaced by an empirically equivalent modalization, MOD(B), not so ontologically committed. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  46
    The universal class has a spinozistic partitioning.Joel Friedman - 1976 - Synthese 32 (3-4):403 - 418.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  63
    Some settheoretical partition theorems suggested by the structure of Spinoza's God.Joel Friedman - 1974 - Synthese 27 (1-2):199 - 209.
  6.  5
    Was Spinoza Fooled by the Ontological Argument?Joel I. Friedman - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):997-998.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  29
    Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators.Kevin P. Weinfurt, Joëlle Y. Friedman, Michaela A. Dinan, Jennifer S. Allsbrook, Mark A. Hall, Jatinder K. Dhillon & Jeremy Sugarman - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):581-591.
    Strategies for disclosing investigators' financial interests to potential research participants have been adopted by many research institutions. However, little is known about how decisions are made regarding disclosures of financial interests to potential research participants, including what is disclosed and the rationale for making these determinations. We sought to understand the attitudes, beliefs, and practices of institutional review board chairs, conflict of interest committee chairs, and investigators regarding disclosure of financial interests to potential research participants. Several themes emerged, including general (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  78
    Spinoza's problem of “other minds”.Joel I. Friedman - 1983 - Synthese 57 (1):99 - 126.
  9.  21
    Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators.Kevin P. Weinfurt, Joëlle Y. Friedman, Michaela A. Dinan, Jennifer S. Allsbrook, Mark A. Hall, Jatinder K. Dhillon & Jeremy Sugarman - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):581-591.
    Investigator and institutional financial conflicts of interest have raised concerns about both the integrity of clinical research and protecting the rights and welfare of research participants. In response, professional groups and governmental bodies have issued guidance for managing conflicts of interest to minimize their potential untoward effects. Although a variety of approaches have been offered, a common protection is to disclose financial interests in research to potential research participants as part of the recruitment and informed consent process. This approach reinforces (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  36
    Plato'seuthyphro and Leibniz' law.Joel I. Friedman - 1982 - Philosophia 12 (1-2):1-20.
  11.  52
    Necessity and the Ontological Argument.Joel I. Friedman - 1980 - Erkenntnis 15 (3):301-331.
  12.  15
    The Mystic's Ontological Argument.Joel I. Friedman - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):73 - 78.
  13.  27
    Posthumous Meditations: A Dialogue in Three Acts. [REVIEW]Joel Friedman - 1985 - Teaching Philosophy 8 (3):257-259.
  14.  91
    How the finite follows from the infinite in Spinoza's metaphysical system.Joel Friedman - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):371 - 407.
  15.  10
    Methodological Problems Regarding Anomalies in Science.Joel Friedman - 1975 - Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 5:175-181.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  22
    Towards an adequate definition of distribution for first-order logic.Joel I. Friedman - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (2):161 - 192.
  17.  57
    The natural God: A God even an atheist can believe in.Joel I. Friedman - 1986 - Zygon 21 (3):369-388.
    . In this paper, I attempt to dissolve the theism/atheism boundary. In the first part, I consider last things, according to mainstream science. In the second part, I define the Natural God as the Force of Nature—evolving, unifying, maximizing—and consider Its relation to last things. Finally, I discuss our knowledge of the Natural God and Its relevance to our personal lives. I argue that we can know the Natural God through scientific reason combined with global intuition, and that this knowledge, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  46
    The generalized continuum hypothesis is equivalent to the generalized maximization principle.Joel I. Friedman - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):39-54.
    In spite of the work of Gödel and Cohen, which showed the undecidability of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis from the axioms of set theory, the problem still remains to decide GCH on the basis of new axioms. It is almost 100 years since Cantor first conjectured the Continuum Hypothesis, yet we seem to be no closer to determining its truth. Nevertheless, it is a sound methodological principle that given any undecidable set-theoretical statement, we should search for “other axioms of set (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  7
    The Mystic'S Ontological Argument.Joel D. Friedman - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):73-78.