32 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Jeremy R. Garrett [32]Jeremy Ray Garrett [1]
  1.  24
    Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.Ivor Berkowitz & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):4-16.
    The past decade has witnessed escalating legal and ethical challenges to the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria. The legal tactic of demanding consent for the apnea test, if successful, can halt the DNC. However, US law is currently unsettled and inconsistent in this matter. Consent has been required in several trial cases in Montana and Kansas but not in Virginia and Nevada. In this paper, we analyze and evaluate the legal and ethical bases for requiring consent before apnea testing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  2.  40
    A Framework for Analyzing the Ethics of Disclosing Genetic Research Findings.Lisa Eckstein, Jeremy R. Garrett & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (2):190-207.
    Over the past decade, there has been an extensive debate about whether researchers have an obligation to disclose genetic research findings, including primary and secondary findings. There appears to be an emerging (but disputed) view that researchers have some obligation to disclose some genetic findings to some research participants. The contours of this obligation, however, remain unclear. -/- As this paper will explore, much of this confusion is definitional or conceptual in nature. The extent of a researcher’s obligation to return (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  3.  44
    Collectivizing Rescue Obligations in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):3-11.
    Bioethicists invoke a duty to rescue in a wide range of cases. Indeed, arguably, there exists an entire medical paradigm whereby vast numbers of medical encounters are treated as rescue cases. The intuitive power of the rescue paradigm is considerable, but much of this power stems from the problematic way that rescue cases are conceptualized—namely, as random, unanticipated, unavoidable, interpersonal events for which context is irrelevant and beneficence is the paramount value. In this article, I critique the basic assumptions of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  4.  17
    Against Multiplying Clinical Ethics Standards without Necessity: The Case for Parsimony in Evaluating Decision-making Capacity.Jeremy R. Garrett, John C. Moskop & J. Clint Parker - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):87-89.
    Decision-making capacity (DMC) is, in many ways, a central organizing concept of modern health care ethics. Patients with DMC have the moral—if not always the legal—authority to make all manner of...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  46
    The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy.Jeremy R. Garrett (ed.) - 2012 - Mit Press.
    A balanced, accessible discussion of whether and on what grounds animal research can be ethically justified.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6. Utilitarianism, vegetarianism, and human health: A response to the causal impotence objection.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (3):223–237.
    abstract It is generally assumed that the link between utilitarianism and vegetarianism is relatively straightforward. However, a familiar objection to utility‐based vegetarianism maintains that, given the massive scale of animal agribusiness, any given person is causally impotent in reducing the overall number of animals raised for food and, thus, in reducing the unfathomably high quantity of disutility engendered thereby. Utilitarians have frequently responded to this objection in two ways: first, by appealing to expected utility and economic thresholds, and, secondly, by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  7.  44
    What We Do When We Resuscitate Extremely Preterm Infants.Jeremy R. Garrett, Brian S. Carter & John D. Lantos - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):1-3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  21
    Does Anyone Need to Regulate Parental Access to Fetal Genetic Information?Jeremy R. Garrett - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (2):28-30.
    Prospective parents have long been interested in knowing as much information about their children as early as possible. This interest is not—and never has been—strictly limited to significant “medi...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  16
    Two Agendas for Bioethics: Critique and Integration.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2014 - Bioethics 29 (6):440-447.
    Many bioethicists view the primary task of bioethics as ‘value clarification’. In this article, I argue that the field must embrace two more ambitious agendas that go beyond mere clarification. The first agenda, critique, involves unmasking, interrogating, and challenging the presuppositions that underlie bioethical discourse. These largely unarticulated premises establish the boundaries within which problems can be conceptualized and solutions can be imagined. The function of critique, then, is not merely to clarify these premises but to challenge them and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  27
    Reframing the Ethical Debate Regarding Incidental Findings in Genetic Research.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):44-46.
  11.  28
    Prologomena to Any Future Pediatric Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):63-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  19
    Principles over Propositions: Or, How to Reject Metaphysical Neutrality in Bioethics.Leslie Ann McNolty & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):31-34.
    The emergence and development of the field of clinical ethics coincided with the revitalization of moral philosophy following the publication of John Rawls’ ma...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  25
    Marriage unhitched from the state: a defense.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (2):161-180.
    In 1970, President Richard Nixon expressed his unambiguous support for interracial marriage; as for same-sex marriage, he exclaimed, "I can't go that far—that's the year 2000" . Nixon's prescient remark, made shortly after the Supreme Court's 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia to overturn anti-miscegenation laws, expresses at once hesitancy for, yet resigned acceptance of, the inevitable expansion of civil marriage to include more and more kinds of loving partnerships. Nearly forty years later, Nixon's uncanny prediction appears close to being (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  14.  28
    More than Warm Fuzzy Feelings: The Imperative of Institutional Morale in Hospital Pandemic Responses.Jeremy R. Garrett & Leslie Ann McNolty - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):92-94.
    Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2020, Page 92-94.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  27
    Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services.Jeremy R. Garrett, Leslie Ann McNolty, Ian D. Wolfe & John D. Lantos - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):79-80.
    The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  29
    It’s the Idiom, Stupid: A Plea for Formal Rhetorical Analysis in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):67-69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  58
    Bariatric Surgery and the Social Character of the Obesity Epidemic.Jeremy R. Garrett & Leslie Ann McNolty - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):20-22.
  18.  28
    Public reasons for private vows: a response to Gilboa.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (3):261-273.
    The question of whether a liberal state ought to recognize same-sex marriage must be situated within a broader inquiry into the proper relationship between political liberalism and marriage simpliciter. This general inquiry invites a diverse set of responses to the narrower question.A first widely held view—call it thick marital egalitarianism—sees a straightforward link from central liberal values, such as neutrality, equality, and nondiscrimination, to the full and equal inclusion of all willing partnerships into the thickly constituted, state-defined institution of marriage. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  82
    Why the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law Undermines Traditional Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):591-622.
  20.  51
    Bioethics and the philosophy of medicine: A thirty-year perspective.J. R. Engelhardt, Jeremy R. Garrett & Fabrice Jotterand - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):565 – 568.
  21.  16
    Addressing the Burdens That Newborn Screening Imposes on Underserved Communities.Meghan E. Strenk, Courtney Berrios & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):79-82.
    Newborn screening (NBS) began in the 1960s by testing all newborns for a single condition—phenylketonuria, or PKU—which, when identified and treated early, significantly reduces morbidity. Over the...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. A Prima Facie Case Against Civil Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):41-53.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  25
    Bioethics: Concepts, conflicts, and controversies.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):227 – 230.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  14
    Beyond Harms and Benefits: Rethinking Duties to Disclose Misattributed Parentage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (4):37-38.
    In this issue of the Hastings Center Report, Amulya Mandava, Joseph Millum, and Benjamin E. Berkman revisit an old conundrum—whether to disclose incidental findings of misattributed parentage—in light of new developments in genomic sequencing that will make that conundrum both more complex and more common. While the authors’ defense of nondisclosure as the appropriate default action in genomic research aligns with prior thinking and practice, their exploration of philosophical foundations is refreshingly rigorous and developed. The final product of their analysis—an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  74
    History, Tradition, and the Normative Foundations of Civil Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2008 - The Monist 91 (3-4):446-474.
  26.  41
    Patient Autonomy and the Twenty-First Century Physician.Jeremy R. Garrett & John D. Lantos - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):3-3.
    In this issue of the Report, Daniel Groll suggests new ways to understand old tensions between autonomy and paternalism. He categorizes disagreements between doctors and patients in four ways. Some are about the ends or goals of medical treatment. For these, he claims, patient choices are based upon patient values, and physicians should neither challenge nor assess them. More common are disagreements about the appropriate means to achieve an agreed-upon goal. These subdivide into two distinct categories—those in which the relative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  22
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination”.Jeremy R. Garrett & Ivor Berkowitz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):W1-W5.
    Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page W1-W5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  16
    The Poverty of Value Clarification: Using Ethical Theory to Critique and Transcend the “Givens” of Clinical Ethics Consultation.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):48-51.
    Clinical ethics consultation is beset by a triumvirate of limited opportunities, modest aims, and conservative impulses. Contrary to what their “God committee” nickname would imply, clinical ethics...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  23
    One Exemption Too Many: The Case for Mandated CCHD Screening.John D. Lantos, Julie Caciki & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):3-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  21
    For Whom the Burden Tolls: Gender and the Unequal Management of Fetal Risks and Parental Expectations.Leslie Ann McNolty & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):17-19.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  31
    The Strange Tale of Three Identical Strangers: Cinematic Lessons in Bioethics.Bryanna Moore, Jeremy R. Garrett, Leslie Ann McNolty & Maria Cristina Murano - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):21-23.
    Tim Wardle’s 2018 documentary film Three Identical Strangers is an exploration of identity, family, and loss. It’s also about nature versus nurture and the boundaries of ethically permissible research, particularly research involving children. The film tells the story of identical triplets who were separated soon after birth in 1961. A different family adopted each boy, without being told that their son had two identical brothers. The adoption agency responsible for finding the families was collaborating with a group of researchers working (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  27
    Engaging Pediatric Health Professionals in Interactive Online Ethics Education.Diane M. Plantz, Jeremy R. Garrett, Brian Carter, Angela D. Knackstedt, Vanessa S. Watkins & John Lantos - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (6):15-20.
    Bioethical decision‐making in pediatrics diverges from similar decisions in other medical domains because the young child is not an autonomous decision‐maker, while the teen is developing—and should be encouraged to develop—autonomy and decisional capacity. Thus the balance between autonomy and beneficence is fundamentally different in pediatrics than in adult medicine. While ethical dilemmas that reflect these fundamental issues are common, many pediatric physician and nursing training programs do not delve into the issues or offer specific training about how to deal (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark