Order:
  1.  76
    Innovation, ethics, and entrepreneurship.Morgan P. Miles, Linda S. Munilla & Jeffrey G. Covin - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 54 (1):97-101.
    This paper is a response to Ray's recent proposal that the intellectual property rights attached to potentially life saving/life sustaining innovations should become public goods in cases where markets are either unable or unwilling to pay for the creation of the intellectual property. Using a free market approach to innovation based on Western moral philosophy, we suggest that treating intellectually protected life saving/life sustaining innovations as public goods will likely reduce social welfare over the long term.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2. Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. [REVIEW]Morgan P. Miles & Jeffrey G. Covin - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):299 - 311.
    Corporate reputation is an intangible asset that is related to marketing and financial performance. The social, economic, and global environment of the 1990'shas resulted in environmental performance becoming an increasingly important component of a company'sreputation. This paper explores the relationship between reputation, environmental performance, and financial performance, and looks at the contingencies that impact environmental policy making.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  3.  49
    The constant gardener revisited: The effect ofsocial blackmail on the marketing concept,innovation, and entrepreneurship. [REVIEW]Morgan P. Miles, Linda S. Munilla & Jeffrey G. Covin - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3):287 - 295.
    This paper discusses how adoption of the social dimensions of the marketing concept may unintentionally restrict innovation and corporate entrepreneurship, ultimately reducing social welfare. The impact of social marketing on innovation and entrepreneurship is discussed using the case of multinational pharmaceutical firms that are under pressure when marketing HIV treatments in poor countries.The argument this paper supports is that social welfare may eventually be diminished if forced social responsibility is imposed. The case of providing subsidized AIDS medication to less developed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations