This article examines the thought of two prominent political theorists: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. Both Rawls and Habermas take deliberation to be central to the theory of justice. In their view, deliberation provides a necessary alternative to paternalistic models of power and authority. The deliberative turn has been celebrated as one of the great frontiers of political theory. But what are its limitations? What are its blind spots? This article argues that the deliberative turn has reinforced the anthropocentrism of (...) modern political theory by categorically excluding the moral claims of animals from the sphere of justice. The article then proposes an evolutionary conception of justice as a way out of our anthropocentric social imaginary. (shrink)

This article provides an account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s contribution to communication theory. That contribution is made explicit through a comparison between MacIntyre and Thomas Kuhn. The article begins with a review of Kuhn’s incommensurability thesis, followed by a summary of the intellectual debates in which MacIntyre situates his position. It then presents MacIntyre’s analysis of the incommensurability of traditions, followed by an account of his model of communication and dialogue. It will be shown that MacIntyre’s answer to the problem of (...) rational choice between incommensurable traditions is a direct consequence of his nuanced analysis of translation and understanding. (shrink)

This paper offers a pragmatist reading of the political thought of Amartya Sen. In his recent book, The Idea of Justice, Sen argues against the transcendental institutionalism of John Rawls in favour of a comparative approach that differentiates what is more from what is less just. Sen’s fallibilistic approach to justice bears a strong affinity to classical and contemporary pragmatism. Reading Sen in a pragmatist light enables us to appreciate the nature, strengths, and weaknesses of his project. Relying on the (...) thought of Robert Brandom, this paper argues that the ongoing and indeterminate process of working out the details of an imperfect and evolving idea of justice through public reason is an example of what Brandom calls “making explicit in principle what is implicit in practice.” Brandom’s inferentialism offers a useful corrective to Sen’s intuitionism about the idea and perception of “manifest injustice.”. (shrink)