Danksagung -- Abkurzungen -- Einleitung -- Kapitel I. Eingangssynchronopse, 1561-1679 -- Kapitel II. Institutio oratoria -- Kapitel III. Meprise und wertschatzung von rhetorik-rhetorikkonzeptionen -- Kapitel IV. Stilpaten, philologenfreunde -- Kapitel V. Bilingualismus -- Kapitel VI. Lekture -- Kapitel VII. Dichtung -- Kapitel VIII. Padagogik -- Kapitel IX. Schreibmethode -- Kapitel X. Schluwort.

Abstract. The article discusses the importance of three extra-legal sources—divine inspiration, natural law, and morality—for a full understanding and effective application of law. Each source is seen as vital due to its ability to compensate for the shortcomings of the other two sources. No source, including belief, is seen as necessarily incompatible with the doctrinal pluralism characteristic of modern societies.

More than a century after the publication of the two main corpora of curse tablets by Richard Wünsch and Auguste Audollent,1 defixiones are now a relatively well-established field of study. New collections, finding lists, and monographs have appeared over the last twenty-five years.2 Still, the relation to the Near Eastern sources, although noticed from the very beginning,3 has never been explored in full. Nor have there been many attempts to use the text on the tablets for investigations that go beyond (...) archaeology, epigraphy, or magic. In this note I would like to emphasise the dependence of Greek and Latin defixiones on older, oriental models, but at the same time show that the curses share some interesting features with the comparatively ‘new’ τέχνη of rhetoric, thus arguing for an interpretation of the magical incantations in the light of rhetorical theory - just as the early history of rhetoric cannot be separated completely from irrational practices and beliefs. (shrink)