8 found
Order:
  1.  53
    Plurality and Conjunction.Jack Hoeksema - 1983 - In Alice G. B. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics. Foris Publications. pp. 1--63.
  2.  26
    The Semantics of Non-Boolean “And”.Jack Hoeksema - 1988 - Journal of Semantics 6 (1):19-40.
    The meaning of “and” in noun phrase conjunctions differs from its ordinary Boolean interpretation in other cases of conjunction, such as sentential and predicate conjunction. More precisely, this is the case when the noun phrases conjoined are referrring terms. A regular Boolean interpretation is still possible whenever two or more quantificational NPs are conjoined. Disjunction is always a Boolean operation. A semantics based on the notion of set formation is provided to deal with conjunctions of referring terms and compared to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  3. Conjunction and Plurality'.Jack Hoeksema - 1983 - In Alice G. B. Ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics. Foris Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  32
    Complex Predicates and Liberation in Dutch and English.Jack Hoeksema - 1991 - Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (6):661 - 710.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  35
    Some Remarks on Focus Adverbs.Jack Hoeksema & Frans Zwarts - 1991 - Journal of Semantics 8 (1-2):51-70.
    Much of what we have to say in the present paper should be thought of as an attempt to get a better understanding of the intricate complexities surrounding focus adverbs. To this end, we discuss a number of restrictions which govern the occurrence of different classes of focus adverbs in Dutch, German and English. We are aware that in doing so we limit ourselves primarily to the descriptive level—a decision which some may well disapprove of Indeed, when Pullum (I988) speaks (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6. There is No Number Effect in the Licensing of Negative Polarity Items: A Reply to Guerzoni and Sharvit. [REVIEW]Jack Hoeksema - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):397-407.
    Guerzoni and Sharvit (Linguistics and Philosophy 30:361–391, 2007) provide an argument that plural, but not singular, wh-phrases may contain a negative polarity item in their restriction, and connect this with the semantic property of exhaustivity. I will show that this claim is factually incorrect, and that the theory of negative polarity licensing does not need to be complicated by taking number distinctions into account. In addition, I will argue that number distinctions do not appear to be relevant for polarity items (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. 668 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Grosz, Barbara Hamm, Fritz Hand, Michael.Herman L. Hendriks, Jim Higginbotham, Julia Hirschberg, Jack Hoeksema, Terence Horgan, S. Iatridou, David Israel, Lucja Iwanska, Mark Johnson & Arivind Joshi - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19:667-668.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  19
    Categorial Grammar and the Logical Form of Quantification.Jack Hoeksema - 1988 - International Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):131-132.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark