Order:
  1. In Theories of memory.J. M. Gardiner, R. I. Java, A. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway & P. E. Morris - 1993 - In A. Collins, S. Gathercole, Martin A. Conway & P. E. Morris (eds.), Theories of Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  2.  21
    Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory.J. M. Gardiner, C. Ramponi & A. Richardson-Klavehn - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):484-496.
    Level of processing and generation effects were replicated in separate experiments in which recognition memory was tested using either short (500 ms) or long (1500 ms) response deadlines. These effects were similar at each deadline. Moreover, at each deadline these effects were associated with subsequent reports of remembering, not of knowing. And reports of both knowing and remembering increased following the longer deadline. These results imply that knowing does not index an automatic familiarity process, as conceived in some dual-process models (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  14
    Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory - volume 8, number 4 (1999), pages 484-496.J. M. Gardiner, C. Ramponi & A. Richardson-Klavehn - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):327-327.
    On pages 490-491, in describing the results of Experiment 2, the authors state that out of a total of 3840 responses, only 355 (or 9%) fell outside the response deadlines. In fact, the total number of responses in Experiment 2 was 3200 and so the 355 responses represented 11%, not 9%, of the total. This error has no other implications. The authors are grateful to Peter Graf (personal communication, March 12, 2000) for pointing out the error.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark