On April 3, 1995, the Fourth Circuit upheld the right of a Maryland hospital to terminate a surgeon who was HIV-positive ). A resident in the University of Maryland Neurosurgical Training Program was dismissed when hospital administrators learned of his infection with HIV. The resident, known as Dr. Doe, claimed that his termination violated federal laws protecting persons with disabilities. The court upheld the hospital's actions as lawful and affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for the hospital.Dr. Doe (...) charged that his dismissal from the training program violated the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (shrink)

This volume contains ten essays that treat the relationship between Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors in the early modern canon. The essays divide into five pairs devoted respectively to Descartes, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. In each case, the work of a prominent Kant scholar precedes a reply by an early modernist. This format provides the opportunity to reevaluate both Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors, the contention being that the latter “in our historical conscience” too often (...) are read “in light of Kant’s reconstruction of their thought”.In this review, I discuss a selection of the articles in order to evaluate the extent to which they contribute to the stated historiographic aim of the volume. Each of the ten contributions provides a worthwhile read in isolation from the others, but the success they achieve in reassessing the relationship of Kantian to pre-Kantian philosophy varies significantly from essay to essay. Cumulatively, they offer an inspiring retort to the central arguments of that chapter of modern philosophy entitled “On the division of all philosophies into vorkantische and nachkantische. (shrink)

This is a study of the theory of knowledge as proposed by Sankara, the eighth century Indian philosopher. After taking note of the controversy still existing among scholars concerning several books attributed to Sankara as well as certain points of his doctrine, the author bases his conclusions on the principal works of Sankara himself. Though Sankara calls himself a mere commentator of Hindu Scripture, still, he is no blind follower of tradition, but upholds the value of reasoning in making out (...) and establishing the right meaning of Scripture. Similarly experience is valued by Sankara sometimes even against the testimony of Scripture, especially when the latter seems to contradict evident facts. But the highest form of knowledge for Sankara is anubhava or direct experience, through which Brahman, the Supreme Reality, is realized as the ultimate and real self of all things. The author places Sankara's theory in proper perspective comparing it with the theories of other Indian schools and even of Western Philosophers.—J. K. (shrink)

This is a text book for an introductory course combining metaphysics and natural theology. It deals with the nature of metaphysical knowledge, act and potency, pure existence, becoming and causality, as well as the problems of natural theology like the demonstration of the existence of God, His attributes, and activity. The problems are so placed that God appears at every step of metaphysics as the first and Supreme Being, the pure act and first cause of all things.—J. K.

The originality of this work consists in its presentation of Royce as a man of letters. Royce the philosopher is well known to us. But the author says that "it seems never to have been seriously argued that he was also an eminent writer." So the first chapter deals with him as a "Man of Letters"—the prose writer, the literary critic, the historian, the novelist. The next three chapters are about his philosophy—a brief historic and systematic study. In the final (...) chapter the author shows the "Relevance of Royce." With extensive notes and references, a chronology of Royce's life, and a selected bibliography, this book seems to be a good introduction to Royce.—J. K. (shrink)

Philosophy is often regarded as a difficult subject, above the reach of ordinary men and set aside for a selected few intellectuals. Emmet says that "this is unfortunate and that philosophical matters are often less difficult and more important than is generally supposed." So he tries to introduce the reader gently to the activity of philosophising. The first four chapters discuss the basic principles connected with handling words and ideas. The nature of value judgments is analyzed in the fifth chapter. (...) The last two chapters deal with the rather difficult problems of "Appearance and Reality" and "Free Will and Determinism." In order to arouse the interest of the readers in the practice of philosophical activity, the author has furnished each chapter with exercises, adding his own comments at the end of the book.—J. K. (shrink)

This volume contains thirty essays written in honor of Charles Hartshorne. The papers are divided into four sections: The Current Status of Metaphysics, Studies in Whiteheadian Philosophy, Studies in Metaphysics and Logic, and Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Although many of the essays do not focus directly on Hartshorne's thought, two of the most interesting do center on his theological concerns. They are Shubert Ogden's "Bultmann's Demythologizing and Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism" and J. N. Findlay's "Reflections on Necessary Existence. Included (...) in the book are two bibliographies, one noting the published works of Hartshorne and the other listing writings by and about Whitehead published in languages other than English.—J. K. R. (shrink)

This biographical sketch of Kierkegaard goes far in revealing the chief psychological features that influenced his writings. Considerable emphasis is placed on Kierkegaard's relations with his father and Regine Olsen. Kierkegaard is pictured primarily as a melancholy, guilt-ridden person, who was plagued by his own imperfections before God. Considerable use is made of Kierkegaard's writings, but little is said about the role and content of the devotional writings and the religious discourses. The book includes a small glossary of Kierkegaardian terms.—J. (...) K. R. (shrink)

The introduction gives a brief but very useful account of the life and works of Aquinas. The Dictionary is planned as a handbook for modern students on the model of the Plato Dictionary and the Aristotle Dictionary and concentrates on the interests of modern studies in philosophy and theology. Hence terms like Analogy of Being, Participation, Act, Potency, Matter, Form, Person, Individuation, and the other central notions of Thomistic Philosophy receive scant treatment. Similarly theological terms like Incarnation, Trinity, Redemption, and (...) Supernatural are omitted. But it contains an impressive number of entries most of which get several important text references from the works of St. Thomas.—J. K. (shrink)

This is a doctoral thesis in the Department of Philosophy of the Madras University. Central to Indian philosophical thought is Mukti or liberation from the present state of ignorance and bondage. But the positive meaning of this liberation is not conceived in the same way by all Indian schools. In the first part of the book the author examines the opinions of various Indian schools other than Vedanta, including Buddhism and Jainism. The second part explains the point of Advaita Vedanta, (...) the chief exponent of which is Sankara. For Advaita or Non-Dualism Brahman is the unique, infinite and immutable reality; Finite beings are maya or unreal beside the absolute reality of Brahman. They have only a relative and practical reality for human life until Mukti or liberation is attained in the realization that Brahman is the real self of all and the world of finite beings ceases to have any further meaning. All religious exercises are only means towards this final realization. On the whole the book is a synthesis of metaphysics from the Indian, especially non-dualistic, point of view. Twelve pages of Errata at the end of the book do little honor to the printers and publishers of the Madras University Philosophical Series.—J. K. (shrink)

Lönning suggests that theology has long been faced with the problem of bringing Christian revelation and human culture and reason into relation without distortion of the Christian gospel. At the present time, Lönning sees this dilemma arising out of the confrontation of traditional Christian claims with those of existentialism and demythologized interpretations of Scripture, especially in regard to the issues of the nature of God's revelation in Christ and man's sinfulness and salvation. Lönning is critical of a demythologized and existentialized (...) Christian faith, claiming that faith must be more historically grounded than Bultmann allows, and that existential self-estrangement must be traced back to a fundamental distortion of man's relation to God. These remarks about contemporary theology are couched in an historical setting that includes essays on Luther, Pascal, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche—J. K. R. (shrink)

The work under consideration attempts to discover a definition of game such as may serve as a foundation for a philosophical theory of games. It incorporates material from papers earlier published in Philosophy of Science, Ethics and in Osterhoudt's Philosophy of Sport. The exposition consists in the defense of a proposed definition against an array of criticisms until, after considerable exploration, a revised definition is arrived at to which no further objection is made. The author assures unity of form and (...) content by presenting the material in the manner of a philosophical dialogue and then by embellishing the dialogue with genial language and charming examples. As a result, it is clear that the search for a definition of game is meant to be a case that falls under the eventual definiendum. Although this work not only counters the Wittgensteinian proscription against definitions but does so relative to just that example by which Wittgenstein intended to show that the search for definitions is futile, the author cautions in the Preface that it was not his objective to write an "anti-anti-definitional manifesto." Yet engaging as this study is, the definition in which it culminates will neither dissuade the Wittgensteinians nor fully convince those more sympathetic with its aims, for the treatment of such topics as make-believe games and "Bernean" games seems less than conclusive, and the definition's implications may be problematical for questions such as, e.g., whether love-making is to be construed as a game and whether activities governed by Robert's rules of order qualify as games. The last chapter's metaphysical excursus on games, work, and life departs from the earlier playfulness, and the author's contention that ultimately it is games that make life worthwhile gives this study a serious character that goes beyond that customarily associated with a search for a definition. This study has value both for the specialist working in the philosophical theory of games and for the teacher seeking a text that will expose students to careful philosophical reasoning, analytical and critical skills, and the methodologies of counter-example and mental experiment, and do so in an imaginative and appealing way.--J.K. (shrink)

The book is a humanistic evaluation of the achievements of Indian tradition in the areas of Philosophy, Religion, History, Science, Social Organization, Ethics, Economics, and Politics. Murty tries to point out with a great deal of evidence that the ordinary antinomies like the Spiritual East and the Scientific West do not hold good. Hindu Scriptures emphasize the value of earthly life too. India made significant contributions in the areas of Mathematics and Astronomy. It had a well planned social organization and (...) developed a highly sophisticated system of government. The laws which governed the evolution of Indian Culture are the same as that of the rest of humanity. Only, it passed the recent stages of Western Culture long ago and was for long dormant and in decline. Written against the background of Western publications about Indian Culture the book has throughout an apologetic ring.—J. K. (shrink)

Jewish and Christian philosophy existed side by side in the Middle Ages. Both sought the same goal: the explanation of God and His universe. Both utilized the same sources; yet each attained different philosophical and theological systems. The Meditation of the Sad Soul illustrates this divergence between Christian and Jewish thought. Furthermore, since it stands midway between Neo-platonic and Aristotelian Judaism, it underlines the development of key philosophical concepts common to both Judaism and Christianity. Abraham Bar Hayya lived in eleventh (...) century Barcelona, an intellectual center for both Jews and Arabs. The major points of his philosophy blend rabbinical, Neo-platonic and Aristotelian ideas, yet maintain a unique independence of their own. For instance, Abraham cut through the rabbinical and Aristotelian proofs of God, demanding instead a primary positive faith in God's existence. Caught up in the theology of light, he rejected the Platonic idea that darkness was merely an absence of light. Rather, darkness had a force equal to light. Most important, darkness and light were opposites, as were good and evil. God created both. Abraham insists that each had an independent existence in the world. Abraham's thought shows a more "rational" strain which appears later in Christian and even Jewish "heresies." Since good and evil exist as positive forces, man can freely choose his path to salvation. Abraham never gets caught in the Augustinian dilemma of will, grace, and predestination. Further examples of Abraham's independent position crop up in his ideas of creation and time. Creation ex nihilo, of course, but creation in time. Time must have a beginning and, consequently, an end. But man does not have to await passively the Messiah's rectification of sin. Man must repent here on earth and actively lead a good life. He cannot repent after death. How influential was Abraham's tract? The editor calls it a "minor classic" yet does not indicate that it formed a basis for later Christian theology. Maimonides knew it and rejected some of its basic tenets. Still, the book is important since it indicates a striking combination of traditional philosophy subjected to a new critical rationalism, an it foreshadows some of the questions raised by deviant Christian and Jewish theologians.--J. K. B. (shrink)

The author tries to present "a clearer view of God's revealed ideal for the preacher, what he is and how he is to do his work." For that purpose he considers "his message and his authority, the character of the proclamation he is called to make, the vital necessity of his own experience of the Gospel, the nature of his motive, the source of his power, and the moral qualities which should characterize him, notably humility, gentleness and love." This preacher's (...) portrait, a portrait painted by the hand of God himself on the broad canvas of the New Testament is arrived at by the author by analyzing the different words used in the New Testament for the Christian preacher, such as Steward, Herald, Witness, Father, and Servant. This book, I believe, would be a very useful guide for every Christian preacher.—J. K. (shrink)

This book is an important attempt to make explicit the moral and political implications and presuppositions of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. To many readers of Wittgenstein it will come as a surprise that there should be any significant political implications at all, for Wittgenstein’s work more than that of most other philosophers seems to be concerned exclusively with technical philosophical problems. Nevertheless, even before the appearance of Moran’s study, several commentators have suggested that the Tractatus is at least something more (...) than a treatise for philosophers; and Wittgenstein himself, in a letter to Ludwig von Ficker, stated flatly: "The point of the book is an ethical one." Moran, to the reviewer’s knowledge, is the first philosopher to take Wittgenstein’s own appraisal seriously enough to work out systematically the "wisdom" expressed, if muted, by the Tractatus. (shrink)

After an introduction about the nature of religion and primitive religion, the author discusses the Indian religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Vedantism and Yoga. How Vedantism and Yoga could be considered as a religion different from Hinduism is not clear. In the second part the author studies the religions of China and Japan. Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism, and Shintoism are represented. As the representative religions of Western civilization he has chosen Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Humanism. The norm the author has adopted (...) to distinguish between the Eastern and Western religions is questionable. The concluding chapter discusses syncretic tendencies and the pursuit of comparative studies that might eventually help to form a World Religion.—J. K. (shrink)

This is an easy reference book on the chief figures of the history of philosophy. All the principal philosophers from Ptah-Hotep of Egypt through Thales, Buddha, Confucius, and Socrates down to modern times are presented with a statement about each one's philosophical contributions and principal works. A good many living philosophers like Bertrand Russell, Heidegger, Jaspers, Ryle, Popper, and Gilson are introduced.—J. K.