In this review essay J.J. Chambliss assesses the current state of the field of philosophy of education through analysis of four recent edited compilations: Randall Curren’s A Companion to Philosophy of Education; Nigel Blake, Paul Smeyers, Richard Smith, and Paul Standish’s The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Education; Wilfred Carr’s The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Philosophy of Education; and Randall Curren’s Philosophy of Education: An Anthology. He considers how these books address the question of what constitutes philosophy of education, with specific (...) reference to the approach each takes to two topics: feminism and practical reason. Then, taking as a starting point Carr’s insight that a revised history of the philosophy of education could help us better understand the discipline, Chambliss traces the evolution of philosophy of education in the United States from the discipline’s origins, dominated by a tension between Empiricism and Idealism; to the “schools of philosophy” approach — that is, applying a set of beliefs derived from a particular philosophical school to education — that prevailed through the mid‐twentieth century; to the wide‐ranging contemporary work in the field that draws from newer methodologies and philosophical research programs. (shrink)
The present essay grew out of an inte:rest in exploring the relationship be tween "imagination" and "reason" in the history of naturalistic thinking. The essay tries to show something of the spirit of naturalism coming to terms with the place of imagination and reason in knowing, making, and doing as activities of human experience. This spirit is discussed by taking as its point of departure the thinking of five writers: Plato, Aristotle, Giam battista Vieo, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Keats. Plato (...) and Aristotle are considered as spokesmen of reason in a world which appeared to be dominated by non-reason. They found it essential for human beings to try to learn how to distinguish between the work of imagin ation and the work of reason. In trying to make such a distinction, it becomes clear that imagination has its legitimate place, along with reason, in human activity. Or we might say that determining the place which each has is a continuing problem when human beings take seriously what is involved in shaping mind and character. (shrink)
The aim is to show that, for Dewey, "imagination" is not a rare activity of the human spirit. Rather, it is common to all human beings as a vehicle of learning, by which possibilities are determined, and attempts are made to actualize them in experience. Imagination does not make up things "unreal", but is the power of realizing what is not present. Children's images tend to express themselves in action, and all human beings may bring to life an imageof self (...) which looks forward to a wholeness of life that exceeds the reality of present selves. (shrink)