1.  19
    Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (2):161-172.
    This article contributes to the debate on governance of emerging technologies, focusing in particular on the international level and taking into account the fact that these technologies are developed through a common effort of different stakeholders including governments, research communities, industry and civil society actors. These issues are explored from the perspective of communitarian ethical criticism of liberal social contract thinking, in order to enhance visibility of the influence collective non-state actors exercise on the development of these technologies. In particular, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  51
    The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):461-486.
    This article analyses current trends in and future expectations of nanotechnology and other key enabling technologies for security as well as dual use nanotechnology from the perspective of the ethical Just War Theory (JWT), interpreted as an instrument to increase the threshold for using armed force for solving conflicts. The aim is to investigate the relevance of the JWT to the ethical governance of research. The analysis gives rise to the following results. From the perspective of the JWT, military research (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  10
    Responsible Innovation in Practice – Concepts and Tools.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - Philosophia Reformata 78 (1):47-63.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  20
    Communitarian and Subsidiarity Perspectives on Responsible Innovation at a Global Level.Ineke Malsch - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):137-150.
    All stakeholders agree publicly that innovation and governance of emerging technologies should be done responsibly. However, the international debate on who should do what to contribute to this lofty goal is nowhere near a solution. The starting point of this paper is the issue of how and for which reason to engage stakeholders in addition to governments in the international governance of nanotechnology. This article examines the mainly North-American communitarian criticism of political liberalism and the related concept of subsidiarity in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  9
    Decision Support for International Agreements Regulating Nanomaterials.Ineke Malsch, Martin Mullins, Elena Semenzin, Alex Zabeo, Danail Hristozov & Antonio Marcomini - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (1):39-54.
    Nanomaterials are handled in global value chains for many different products, albeit not always recognisable as nanoproducts. The global market for nanomaterials faces an uncertain future, as the international dialogue on regulating nanomaterials is still ongoing and risk assessment data are being collected. At the same time, regulators and civil society organisations complain about a lack of transparency about the presence of nanomaterials on the market. In the project on Sustainable Nanotechnologies, a Decision Support System has been developed, primarily for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation