15 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Hubert Marraud [15]Huberto Marraud [3]Hubert J. Marraud [1]
  1.  40
    Arguments from Ostension.Hubert Marraud - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):309-327.
    My purpose here is to describe a type of argument characterized by the fact that one of its premises is a directive—i.e. what is expressed by a directive sentence: a general instruction how to proceed or act. This directive premise brings an ostensive mechanism for the inclusion of visual or multimodal elements in an argument. If an argument is an invitation to inference, by using such a directive utterance the addresser is inviting the addressee to make an inference from an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  21
    An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919).Hubert Marraud - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (4):569-593.
    The debate on the a fortiori and the universal that took place between April 1914 and April 1919 in the journal Mind has a double interest for argumentation theorists. First, the discussion is an example of a philosophical polylogue that exhibits the characteristics of a quasi-engaged dialogue (Blair Blair, J. A. (2012 [1998]). “The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument”. Argumentation 12, pp. 325–339. Reprinted in J.A. Blair, Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, pp. 231–244. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.), confirming (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  5
    Methodus argumentandi.Huberto Marraud - 2007 - Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
    Methodus Argumentandi Se trata de una introducción a la lógica informal que, además de tratar lo temas tradicionales como los esquemas argumentativos y las falacias, incluye otros provenientes de la lingüística, como los conectores argumentativos, o de la lógica forma, como la teoría de los sistemas de argumentación abstractos.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  43
    (1 other version)La analogía como transferencia argumentativa (analogy as an argumentative transfer).Hubert Marraud - 2007 - Theoria 22 (2):167-188.
    La tesis central de este artículo es que la argumentación por analogía consiste en la transferencia de un argumento de un dominio a otro con la pretensión de que el argumento término será bueno si lo es el argumento fuente. El examen de algunos argumentos filosóficos tradicionalmente considerados analógicos lleva a distinguir dos tipos de transferencia analógica. Cuando la transferencia se justifica con un principio abductivo como a casos similares, explicaciones similares, el argumento término es más débil que el argumento (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Argumentos a fortiori.Hubert Marraud - 2014 - Theoria 29 (1):99-112.
    I offer an account of _a fortiori_ arguments in the context of a Toulmin-style theory of argumentation schemes. _A fortiori_ arguments contain a comparison of the strength of two or more arguments involving scalar inferences. We can distinguish two kinds of _a fortiori_ arguments depending on whether those scalar inferences connect the premises and the conclusion or the backing and the warrant of the arguments. The first pattern has been studied by rhetoricians and the second pattern by legal argumentation theorists.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  25
    Razonamiento aproximado y grados de consecuencia.Hubert Marraud - 1998 - Endoxa 1 (10):55.
  7.  29
    Group Identity in Public Deliberation.Hubert Marraud - 2023 - Informal Logic 43 (2):224-256.
    I argue that different argumentative practices require participants to categorize themselves in different modes. Accordingly, I distinguish four types of argumentation: rational argumentation, intergroup argumentation, intragroup argumentation, and, finally, personal argumentation. An inescapable implication of my approach to deliberation is that deliberation presupposes the self-categorization of participants in the same ingroup. Deliberation does not require, however, the group to antecede the deliberation process, and a distinctive feature of successful public deliberation is its capacity to produce social identification with the deliberative (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  80
    Paraconsistent Logic: A Proof-Theoretical Approach.Hubert Marraud - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):5-24.
    A logic is paraconsistent if it allows for non-trivial inconsistent theories. Given the usual definition of inconsistency, the notion of paraconsistent logic seems to rely upon the interpretation of teh sign '¬'. As paraconsistent logic challenges properties of negation taken to be basic in other contexts, it is disputable that an operator lacking those properties will count as real negation. The conclusion is that there cannot be genuine paraconsistent logics. This objection can be met from a substructural perspective, since paraconsistent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  7
    The Logical Perspective in Pragma-dialectics.Hubert Marraud - 2024 - Topoi 43 (4):1247-1258.
    I argue that the logical perspective—the study of arguments as products—is not well integrated into pragma-dialectics. I show that the Validity Rule and the Argumentation Scheme Rule, despite being procedural rules, are, in a certain sense, “logical” rules. Subsequently, I distinguish and review three successive periods in the development of the logical dimension of pragma-dialectics: conventionalist, inferentialist and dualist, to reveal that none of them is completely satisfactory. I contend that, given the assumptions and conceptual apparatus of pragma-dialectics, the integration (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  29
    Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies.Fernando Leal & Hubert Marraud - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (4):455-479.
    Anyone interested in philosophical argumentation should be prepared to study philosophical debates and controversies because it is an intensely dialogical, and even contentious, genre of argumentation. There is hardly any other way to do them justice. This is the reason why the present special issue addresses philosophical argumentation within philosophical debates. Of the six articles in this special issue, one deals with a technical aspect, the diagramming of arguments, another contrasts two moments in philosophical argumentation, Antiquity and the twentieth century, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  81
    (1 other version)La iógica que aprendimos.Enrique Alonso & Hubert Marraud - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):327-349.
    Este trabajo constituye una revisión de los contenidos, orientación y objetivos de una parte significativa de los manuales de lógica elemental de las décadas de 1960 y 1970 redactados por autores españoles. En concreto, analizamos los prólogos, los rudimentos prerios, y la presentación de los distintos cálculos gue aparecen en tales obras. EI estudio de la semántica, los contenidos metatcóricos o las extensiones de Ia lógica elemental quedan para una segunda etapa de esta investigacion.This work is a critical examination of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  7
    Argumentos suposicionales, razones y premisas.Huberto Marraud - 2013 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 39 (1):153-165.
    A feature of suppositional arguments is that a conclusion is drawn on the basis not just of assertives or statements, but of an argument. To cover suppositional arguments, many authors have proposed to expand the concept of a premise so that it includes not only assertives or statements but also arguments. In this paper, some of the consequences of this approach for the theory of arguments are explored.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  28
    Deliberación e identidad colectiva. Usos compromisorios, directivos y expresivos de la argumentación.Hubert Marraud - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):67-95.
    La concepción predominante de la argumentación sigue privilegiando la dimensión representacional del lenguaje y, en consecuencia, ignora o infravalora las funciones compromisorias, directivas o expresivas de la argumentación. En este artículo examino los usos de la argumentación en la esfera pública -con especial atención a la deliberación y a la negociación- para poner de manifiesto y reivindicar la importancia de las funciones no persuasivas de la argumentación, entre las que se destaca la construcción y moldeado de identidades sociales.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. El enfoque deíctico-nomológico de Putnam de los términos para género natural.Hubert J. Marraud - 1986 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 15 (3-4):167-180.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  14
    Lógicas modales proposicionales normales sin interpolación.Hubert Marraud - 1993 - Endoxa 1 (2):171.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark