On the one hand, we have a moral principle that we should treat persons equally. We have a moral principle of universality. On the other hand, we have an moral intuition that we have special obligations to our compatriots. We have a moral intuition of particularity. How can we reach equilibrium between universality and particularity? To put it another way, the welfare state assists the national poor. How can we justify favoring our nationals over foreigners? Can we justify the welfare (...) state in an age of globalization? We have two approaches to defend the welfare state. The first approach, the relationship theory, starts from the intuition of particularity; the second approach, the assigned responsibility model, starts from the principle of universality. The refinement of the second approach leads us to a new conception of the world order: complex borders. Personal national boundaries are not simple any longer. Complex borders have been developed to work out the best solutions to various global problems. Globalization urges us to live in an age of complex borders. (shrink)

法哲学の「欲張り」な教科書。わかりやすくておもしろく、最新の研究成果を盛り込みながら、日本だけでなく国際的にも通用する標準...

個人の責務への問いを起点に世界秩序構想を辿る思想の旅。ソクラテス、ホッブズ、カント、ロールズ、サンデルなど古今の思想を渉猟し、国家と法をめぐる根本問題に挑む。.

Many political philosophers take it for granted that we have special obligations to compatriots. They do not deny that we have negative duties towards strangers as well as our compatriots. Our moral duties not to kill others, not to deceive others, and not to harm others are duties to everyone, that is, they are general and not special duties. Meanwhile, they suppose that our positive duties to aid others are special duties. We must give priority to our compatriots when we (...) aid others. Our first responsibility is to the poor, the hungry and the homeless citizens of our own country. (shrink)

賛否が分かれる15の論争的な問いを通じ、法哲学の基礎的な概念や考え方がどのように役立つかを知る「いきなり実践」型の入門書。.