84 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Henry S. Richardson [91]Henry Shattuck Richardson [1]
  1. Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems.Henry S. Richardson - 1990 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (4):279-310.
  2. An Ethical Framework for Global Vaccine Allocation.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Govind Persad, Adam Kern, Allen E. Buchanan, Cecile Fabre, Daniel Halliday, Joseph Heath, Lisa M. Herzog, R. J. Leland, Ephrem T. Lemango, Florencia Luna, Matthew McCoy, Ole F. Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, G. Owen Schaefer, Kok-Chor Tan, Christopher Heath Wellman, Jonathan Wolff & Henry S. Richardson - 2020 - Science 1:DOI: 10.1126/science.abe2803.
    In this article, we propose the Fair Priority Model for COVID-19 vaccine distribution, and emphasize three fundamental values we believe should be considered when distributing a COVID-19 vaccine among countries: Benefiting people and limiting harm, prioritizing the disadvantaged, and equal moral concern for all individuals. The Priority Model addresses these values by focusing on mitigating three types of harms caused by COVID-19: death and permanent organ damage, indirect health consequences, such as health care system strain and stress, as well as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning About the Ends of Policy.Henry S. Richardson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-210.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  4.  64
    Practical Reasoning About Final Ends.Henry S. Richardson - 1994 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Henry Richardson argues that we can determine our ends rationally. He constructs a rich and original theory of how we can reason about our final goals. Richardson defuses the counter-arguments for the limits of rational deliberation, and develops interesting ideas about how his model might be extended to interpersonal deliberation of ends, taking him to the borders of political theory. Along the way Richardson offers illuminating discussions of, inter alia, Aristotle, Aquinas, Sidgwick, and Dewey, as well as the work of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  5. Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and “Reasons That All Can Accept”.Henry S. Richardson & James Bohman - 2009 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (3):253-274.
  6.  33
    The Ancillary‐Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers: An Ethical Framework for Thinking About the Clinical Care That Researchers Owe Their Subjects.Henry S. Richardson & Leah Belsky - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (1):25-33.
  7. Moral Reasoning.Henry S. Richardson - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Moral reasoning is individual or collective practical reasoning about what, morally, one ought to do. Philosophical examination of moral reasoning faces both distinctive puzzles — about how we recognize moral considerations and cope with conflicts among them and about how they move us to act — and distinctive opportunities for gleaning insight about what we ought to do from how we reason about what we ought to do.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  8. Moral Entanglements: The Ancillary-Care Obligations of Medical Researchers.Henry S. Richardson - 2012 - Oup Usa.
    The philosopher Henry Richardson's short book is a defense of a position on a neglected topic in medical research ethics. Clinical research ethics has been a longstanding area of study, dating back to the aftermath of the Nazi death-camp doctors and the Tuskegee syphilis study. Most ethical regulations and institutions have developed in response to those past abuses, including the stress on obtaining informed consent from the subject. Richardson points out that that these ethical regulations do not address one of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9.  5
    Practical Reasoning About Final Ends.Henry S. Richardson - 1994 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Henry Richardson argues that we can determine our ends rationally. He constructs a rich and original theory of how we can reason about our final goals. Richardson defuses the counter-arguments for the limits of rational deliberation, and develops interesting ideas about how his model might be extended to interpersonal deliberation of ends, taking him to the borders of political theory. Along the way Richardson offers illuminating discussions of, inter alia, Aristotle, Aquinas, Sidgwick, and Dewey, as well as the work of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  10.  89
    Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles.Henry S. Richardson - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):285 – 307.
    The notion that it is useful to specify norms progressively in order to resolve doubts about what to do, which I developed initially in a 1990 article, has been only partly assimilated by the bioethics literature. The thought is not just that it is helpful to work with relatively specific norms. It is more than that: specification can replace deductive subsumption and balancing. Here I argue against two versions of reliance on balancing that are prominent in recent bioethical discussions. Without (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  11. Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - The Journal of Ethics 10 (4):419-462.
    Martha Nussbaum has powerfully argued in Frontiers ofJustice and elsewhere that John Rawls’s sort of social-contract theory cannot usefully be deployed to deal with issues pertaining to justice for the disabled. To counter this claim, this article deploys Rawls’s sort of social-contract theory in order to deal with issues pertaining to justice for the disabled—or, since, as Nussbaum stresses, we all have some degree of disability—for the severely disabled. In this way, rather than questioning one by one Nussbaum’s interpretive claims (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  12.  34
    Incidental Findings and Ancillary-Care Obligations.Henry S. Richardson - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):256-270.
    Recent work on incidental fndings, concentrating on the difcult problems posed by the ambiguous results often generated by high-tech medicine, has proceeded largely independently from recent work on medical researchers' ancillary-care obligations, the obligations that researchers have to deal with diseases or conditions besides the one(s) under study. This paper contends that the two topics are morally linked, and specifcally that a sound understanding of ancillary-care obligations will center them on incidental fndings. The paper sets out and defends an understanding (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  13.  21
    Incidental Findings and Ancillary-Care Obligations.Henry S. Richardson - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):256-270.
    This paper explores the convergence of two recent and growing streams of bioethical work and concern. Each has originated independently, but each arises from the fact that the Common Rule that has shaped medical research ethics, as institutionalized in the United States and also abroad, is largely silent about what needs to be done in response to researchers’ positive obligations. One stream concerns what to do about the sometimes vast range of findings that may arise incidentally to performing research procedures. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  14. Practical Reasoning about Final Ends.Henry S. Richardson - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 58 (4):782-783.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  15.  7
    Liberalism and the Good.R. Bruce Douglass, Gerald M. Mara & Henry S. Richardson (eds.) - 1990 - Routledge.
    A collection of critical essays by English and American scholars, including such controversial academic political theorists as Gutmann, Barry and Nussbaum, that raises questions about the current theoretical reassessment of political liberalism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  16.  80
    Beyond Good and Right: Toward a Constructive Ethical Pragmatism.Henry S. Richardson - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (2):108-141.
  17.  79
    Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility*: HENRY S. RICHARDSON.Henry S. Richardson - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):218-249.
    I am going to be discussing a mode of moral responsibility that anglophone philosophers have largely neglected. It is a type of responsibility that looks to the future rather than the past. Because this forward-looking moral responsibility is relatively unfamiliar in the lexicon of analytic philosophy, many of my locutions will initially strike many readers as odd. As a matter of everyday speech, however, the notion of forward-looking moral responsibility is perfectly familiar. Today, for instance, I said I would be (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  18.  41
    Democratic Intentions.Henry S. Richardson - 1997 - Modern Schoolman 74 (4):285-300.
  19. Republicanism and Democratic Injustice.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
    A Theory of Freedom and Government has provided a systematic basis for republican theory in the idea of freedom as non-domination. Can a pure republican view, which confines itself to the normative resources thus afforded, adequately address the full range of issues of social justice? This article argues that while there are many sorts of structural injustice with which a pure republican view can well cope, unfair disparities in political influence, of the kind that Rawls labeled failures of the ‘fair (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  20. 10. Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality (Pp. 179-183). [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson, Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, Peter Singer, Karen Jones, Sergio Tenenbaum, Diana Raffman, Simon Căbulea May, Stephen C. Makin & Nancy E. Snow - 2012 - Ethics 123 (1).
  21.  72
    Relying on Experts as We Reason Together.Henry S. Richardson - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2):91-110.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  22.  5
    Partial Entrustment in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.Henry S. Richardson & Mildred K. Cho - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):24-26.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  84
    Discerning Subordination and Inviolability: A Comment on Kamm's Intricate Ethics.Henry S. Richardson - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (1):81-91.
    Frances Kamm has for some time now been a foremost champion of non-consequentialist ethics. One of her most powerful non-consequentialist themes has been the idea of inviolability. Morality's prohibitions, she argues, confer on persons the status of inviolability. This thought helps articulate a rationale for moral prohibitions that will resist the protean threat posed by the consequentialist argument that anyone should surely be willing to violate a constraint if doing so will minimize the overall number of such violations. As Kamm (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24. Satisficing: Not Good Enough.Henry S. Richardson - 2004 - In Michael Byron (ed.), Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge University Press. pp. 106--130.
  25.  60
    Degrees of Finality and the Highest Good in Aristotle.Henry S. Richardson - 1992 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (3):327-352.
    This article develops a uniform interpretation of "pursuit for the sake of an end", explaining what an "unqualified final" end (sought solely for its own sake) offers that a (merely) final one does not and providing an improved account of what Aristotle means by an "ultimate end". This interpretation sheds light on (1) the regress argument at the outset of "N.E." I.2, (2) the way Aristotle argues for the existence of a highest good, (3) the special contribution of "self-sufficiency" (autarkeia) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  26.  19
    Editorial: The Devotion and Diversity of the Associate Editors.Henry S. Richardson - 2018 - Ethics 129 (1):1-7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  13
    Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology.Henry S. Richardson - 1995 - Ethics 107 (4):746-749.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  28.  14
    Discerning Subordination and Inviolability: A Comment on Kamm's Intricate Ethics: Henry S. Richardson.Henry S. Richardson - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (1):81-91.
    Frances Kamm has for some time now been a foremost champion of non-consequentialist ethics. One of her most powerful non-consequentialist themes has been the idea of inviolability. Morality's prohibitions, she argues, confer on persons the status of inviolability. This thought helps articulate a rationale for moral prohibitions that will resist the protean threat posed by the consequentialist argument that anyone should surely be willing to violate a constraint if doing so will minimize the overall number of such violations. As Kamm (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29.  57
    The Logical Structure of Sittlichkeit: A Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.Henry S. Richardson - 1989 - Idealistic Studies 19 (1):62-78.
    Sittlichkeit seduces: Hegel’s third category of Right, intended to synthesize impartially derived rights with a subjectively centered morality of the good, understandably piques the hopes of his modern readers. How could it not? Sittlichkeit, Ethical Life, holds out the prospect of so much that we still seek. It promises to reconcile welfare and autonomy while guaranteeing concrete content for their product. By combining legal duty with a place for conscience and freedom, it could solve a central problem of politics. Most (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30.  45
    The Logical Structure of Sittlichkeit: A Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.Henry S. Richardson - 1989 - Idealistic Studies 19:62.
    Sittlichkeit seduces: Hegel’s third category of Right, intended to synthesize impartially derived rights with a subjectively centered morality of the good, understandably piques the hopes of his modern readers. How could it not? Sittlichkeit, Ethical Life, holds out the prospect of so much that we still seek. It promises to reconcile welfare and autonomy while guaranteeing concrete content for their product. By combining legal duty with a place for conscience and freedom, it could solve a central problem of politics. Most (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  31. 10. Neil MacCormick, Practical Reason in Law and Morality Neil MacCormick, Practical Reason in Law and Morality (Pp. 192-196).Henry S. Richardson, Cécile Fabre, Joshua Glasgow, Alison Hills, Kieran Setiya & Hallie Rose Liberto - 2009 - In John Hawthorne (ed.), Ethics. Wiley Periodicals.
  32.  58
    Moral Entanglements: Ad Hoc Intimacies and Ancillary Duties of Care.Henry S. Richardson - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):376-409.
    This paper develops and explores the idea of moral entanglements: the ways in which, through innocent transactions with others, we can unintendedly accrue special obligations to them. More particularly, the paper explains intimacy-based moral entanglements, to which we become liable by accepting another's waiver of privacy rights. Sometimes, having entered into others' private affairs for innocent or even helpful reasons, one discovers needs of theirs that then become the focus of special duties of care. The general duty to warn them (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  21
    Announcing an Improvement to the Journal’s Blind Review Process.Henry S. Richardson - 2017 - Ethics 127 (3):519-520.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  20
    10. Larry May, Genocide: A Normative Account Larry May, Genocide: A Normative Account (Pp. 465-469).David Copp, Gerald Gaus, Henry S. Richardson, William A. Edmundson, David Estlund & Edward Slingerland - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):301-334.
  35.  32
    Autonomy's Many Normative Presuppositions.Henry S. Richardson - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):287 - 303.
  36.  33
    Estlund’s Promising Account of Democratic Authority.Henry S. Richardson - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):301-334.
  37.  16
    Editorial: Changes at the Journal.Henry S. Richardson - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):1-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38. The Problem of Liberalism and the Good.Henry S. Richardson - 1990 - In R. Bruce Douglass, Gerald M. Mara & Henry S. Richardson (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. Routledge. pp. 1--28.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  39. The Philosophy of Rawls. A Collection of Essays.Henry S. Richardson & Paul J. Weithman - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):179-180.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40.  30
    Truth and Ends in Dewey's Pragmatism.Henry S. Richardson - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (sup1):109-147.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  41.  69
    Long as You Love Me, It's Alright?Henry S. Richardson - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):183-195.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42. A Theoria Round Table on Philosophy Publishing.Bengt Hansson, Hans van Ditmarsch, Pascal Engel, Sven Ove Hansson, Vincent Hendricks, Søren Holm, Pauline Jacobson, Anthonie Meijers, Henry S. Richardson & Hans Rott - 2011 - Theoria 77 (2):104-116.
    As part of the conference commemorating Theoria's 75th anniversary, a round table discussion on philosophy publishing was held in Bergendal, Sollentuna, Sweden, on 1 October 2010. Bengt Hansson was the chair, and the other participants were eight editors-in-chief of philosophy journals: Hans van Ditmarsch (Journal of Philosophical Logic), Pascal Engel (Dialectica), Sven Ove Hansson (Theoria), Vincent Hendricks (Synthese), Søren Holm (Journal of Medical Ethics), Pauline Jacobson (Linguistics and Philosophy), Anthonie Meijers (Philosophical Explorations), Henry S. Richardson (Ethics) and Hans Rott (Erkenntnis).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  21
    Response to Pettit, Estlund, and Christiano. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):218-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  44.  21
    Précis of Democratic Autonomy. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):187–187.
  45.  54
    Some Tips About What We’Re Looking For.Henry S. Richardson - 2017 - Ethics 128 (1):1-5.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  40
    Rescuing Ethical Theory. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3):703.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Interpreting Rawls: An Essay on Audard, Freeman, and Pogge. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):227-251.
    This review essay on three recent books on John Rawls’s theory of justice, by Catherine Audard, Samuel Freeman, and Thomas Pogge, describes the great boon they offer serious students of Rawls. They form a united front in firmly and definitively rebuffing Robert Nozick’s libertarian critique, Michael Sandel’s communitarian critique, and more generally critiques of “neutralist liberalism,” as well as in affirming the basic unity of Rawls’s position. At a deeper level, however, they diverge, and in ways that, this essay suggests, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  26
    The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, Rainer Forst, Trans. Jeffrey Flynn , 368 Pp., $40 Cloth. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2012 - Ethics and International Affairs 26 (4):483-486.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  18
    Noncognitivist Trumpism: Partisanship and Political Reasoning.Henry S. Richardson - 2019 - Journal of Social Philosophy 50 (4):642-663.
  50. Measurement, Pleasure, and Practical Science in Plato's "Protagoras".Henry S. Richardson - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1):7.
1 — 50 / 84