Order:
Disambiguations
Holly Teetzel [4]H. Teetzel [1]
  1.  25
    Do Physicians’ Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients’ Preferences?Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Robert M. Kaplan, Robert A. Pearlman & Holly Teetzel - 1993 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 4 (1):28-33.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  63
    Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences? A second look.Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Robert M. Kaplan, Esther Rosenberg & Holly Teetzel - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):131-.
    Previous studies have documented the fallibility of attempts by surrogates and physicians to act in a substituted judgment capacity and predict end-of-life treatment decisions on behalf of patients. We previously reported that physicians misperceive their patients' preferences and substitute their own preferences for those of their patients with respect to four treatments: cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest, ventilator for an indefinite period of time, medical nutrition and hydration for an indefinite period of time, and hospitalization in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  6
    Do Physicians’ Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients’ Preferences?L. J. Schneiderman, R. M. Kaplan, R. A. Pearlman & H. Teetzel - 1993 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 4 (1):28-33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  32
    Do Physicians' Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients' Preferences? A Second Look.Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Robert M. Kaplan, Esther Rosenberg & Holly Teetzel - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):131-137.
    Previous studies have documented the fallibility of attempts by surrogates and physicians to act in a substituted judgment capacity and predict end-of-life treatment decisions on behalf of patients. We previously reported that physicians misperceive their patients' preferences and substitute their own preferences for those of their patients with respect to four treatments: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac arrest, ventilator for an indefinite period of time, medical nutrition and hydration for an indefinite period of time, and hospitalization in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  84
    Response to “Reading Futility: Reflections on a Bioethical Concept” by Donald Joralemon , The Rise and Fall of Death: The Plateau of Futility. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Holly Teetzel & Todd Gilmer - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (3):308-309.
    Researchers tracking social trends have discovered a remarkable labor-saving device called the computer. They sit down before the instrument, call up a search engine, enter a key word that they believe represents the trend, and count the number of articles aroused by that key word. They track these numbers over a period of time and even graph them. Those who dislike a certain concept are happy to report the concept's rise and fall. Such has occurred with two articles, one of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark