Order:
Disambiguations
Hazel Brickhill [3]H. Brickhill [1]
  1.  48
    Triangulating non-archimedean probability.Hazel Brickhill & Leon Horsten - 2018 - Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):519-546.
    We relate Popper functions to regular and perfectly additive such non-Archimedean probability functions by means of a representation theorem: every such non-Archimedean probability function is infinitesimally close to some Popper function, and vice versa. We also show that regular and perfectly additive non-Archimedean probability functions can be given a lexicographic representation. Thus Popper functions, a specific kind of non-Archimedean probability functions, and lexicographic probability functions triangulate to the same place: they are in a good sense interchangeable.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  17
    Generalisations of stationarity, closed and unboundedness, and of Jensen's □.H. Brickhill & P. D. Welch - 2023 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 174 (7):103272.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  14
    Square below a non-weakly compact cardinal.Hazel Brickhill - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (3-4):409-426.
    In his seminal paper introducing the fine structure of L, Jensen proved that under \ any regular cardinal that reflects stationary sets is weakly compact. In this paper we give a new proof of Jensen’s result that is straight-forward and accessible to those without a knowledge of Jensen’s fine structure theory. The proof here instead uses hyperfine structure, a very natural and simpler alternative to fine structure theory introduced by Friedman and Koepke.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    Sets and Probability.Leon Horsten & Hazel Brickhill - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-26.
    In this article the idea of random variables over the set theoretic universe is investigated. We explore what it can mean for a random set to have a specific probability of belonging to an antecedently given class of sets, or, in other words, to have a specific probability of having a given set-theoretic property.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark