16 found
Order:
See also
Guglielmo Feis
Università degli Studi di Milano
  1.  11
    Propositions as (non-linguistic) objects and philosophy of law: Norms-as-propositions.Guglielmo Feis - 2020 - Filozofija I Društvo 31 (3):406-419.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  62
    The OIC/PAP Dispute: Two Ways of Interpreting the '€˜Ought' Implies '€˜Can'€™.Guglielmo Feis - 2014 - In Sofia Bonicalzi, Leonardo Caffo & Mattia Sorgon (eds.), Naturalism and Constructivism in Metaethics. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 172--181.
  3.  47
    ‘Ought implies Can’ and the law.Chris Fox & Guglielmo Feis - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):370-393.
    In this paper, we investigate the ‘ought implies can’ thesis, focusing on explanations and interpretations of OIC, with a view to clarifying its uses and relevance to legal philosophy. We first review various issues concerning the semantics and pragmatics of OIC; then we consider how OIC may be incorporated in Hartian and Kelsenian theories of the law. Along the way we also propose a taxonomy of OIC-related claims.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4. Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma.Guglielmo Feis & Umberto Sconfienza - 2012 - Phenomenology and Mind 3:127-138.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  65
    What’s New About New Realism? Mereology and the Varieties of (New) Realism.Guglielmo Feis & Jacopo Tagliabue - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):1035-1046.
    The paper set up a small “philosophical lab” for thought experiments using Digital Universes as its main tool. Digital Universes allow us to examine how mereology affects the debate on New Realism of Ferraris and shed new light on the whole notion of Realism. The semi-formal framework provides a convenient way to model the varieties of realism that are important for the program of New Realism: we then draw the natural consequences of this approach into the ontology of our world, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Impossibilità nel Diritto.Guglielmo Feis - 2014 - Dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Milano
    My Ph.D. thesis œImpossibilità nel diritto€ [Impossibility in the Legal Domain] is devoted to the systematic analyses of what are called, at least prima facie, €œlegal impossibilities. My dissertation defines and isolates an area of studies - impossibility in the law - that has never been put organically together. In my work I present some case studies of normative impossibilities and discuss them from a philosophical point of view: impossible laws, impossible norms in a prescriptive theory of norms (ch. 2), (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  17
    '€œDovere implica potere'€ a tutela dei diritti?Guglielmo Feis - 2012 - In Mario Cossutta (ed.), Diritti Fondamentali E Diritti Sociali. Eut Edizioni Università di Trieste. pp. 81--92.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  6
    In Concreto Antinomies, Predictability, and Lawmaking.Guglielmo Feis - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (4):399-429.
    This paper investigates whether or not cases of in concreto antinomies (ICAs for short, also called indirect antinomies, accidental antinomies, normative conflicts due to the facts, predicaments, or paranomies) can be predicted. I distinguish two main theoretical positions: “Prodetection” argues that we can predict in concreto antinomies; “unpredictability” argues that we cannot predict them.I exemplify the two positions by relying on a disagreement found in the literature; then, after reviewing that disagreement, I (i) provide arguments for both positions; (ii) highlight (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  6
    Impossibility in the Legal Domain.Guglielmo Feis - 2019 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 105 (2):205-217.
    I offer a framework for impossibility in the legal domain. I argue for two main points: the use of ‘impossibility’ and ‘impossible’ in the legal domain is often incoherent; in the law we often different concepts of impossibility as well as concepts that differ from impossibility that are nonetheless called ‘impossibility’.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  10
    Impossibility, Non-Existence and Constitutive Rules.Guglielmo Feis - 2018 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 104 (2):284-297.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  22
    Meeting Dan Sperber'€™s Challenge to Searlean Social Ontology.Guglielmo Feis - 2011 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica--Junior 2 (2):120--123.
  12.  17
    Meeting Dan Sperber’s Challenge to Searlean Social Ontology.Guglielmo Feis - 2011 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior 2 (2):120-123.
    What follows is a brief commentary to Dan Sperber's plenary lecture at ECAP7 "The deconstruction of social unreality". Sperber's main criticism to Searle's socia lontology is that Searle attributes a causal role to mere Cambridge properties. Sperber then argues that declarations do not create institutional facts causally, criticizes the Serlean theory of recognition/acceptance and put forward his thesis using the concept cognitive causal chains.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  25
    Maurizio Ferraris, Documentare la documentalità prima del collasso ontologico.Guglielmo Feis - 2010 - Enthymema 1:275--288.
  14.  37
    Marcel van Ackeren and Michael Kühler , The Limits of Moral Obligation: Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can , pp. ix + 210.Guglielmo Feis - 2017 - Utilitas 29 (3):365-369.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Network Analysis Formalism and the Construction of a Traceability System for Payments. A Sketch of its Legal and Sociological Aspects.Guglielmo Feis - 2013 - Informatica E Diritto 22 (1):281--298.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality.Guglielmo Feis - 2012 - Phenomenology and Mind 2:114-121.
    I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI-act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark