In recent years, many online communities have launched opinion-gathering activities to promote user participation in innovation and improve the quality of new products. The current methods for online innovation activities can be divided into two categories: cognitive guidance and affective guidance. However, the studies on online communities have mainly focused on user engagement motivations, and little attention has been paid to investigating the impact and underlying mechanism of innovation guidance on user participation at the linguistic level. This study first collected (...) secondary data from NetEase.com and conducted an econometric model to explore the impact of cognitive guidance and affective guidance on users’ participation in online innovation activities. Subsequently, we investigated the impact mechanism of different innovation guidance methods on user participation through two experiments, here by drawing on mental simulation theory. The experimental results showed that outcome simulation and process simulation imposed a dual mediating effect of innovation guidance on user participation. In addition, we also found that product types moderate the dual mediating effect of outcome simulation and process simulation. The findings can deepen and expand the research on user participation while providing practical implications for companies and platforms as they attempt to promote user participation in innovation activities. (shrink)

This paper is a complete student-led, student-edited collective writing project (CWP) conducted virtually in Spring 2022 throughout the course Knowledge Socialism taught by professor Michael Peters for the Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal university. The CWP involves 4 international, 5 domestic Ph.D. students, and 2 senior Western scholars as reviewers, revealing their thoughts, arguments, understanding, and criticisms towards the creative economy status in East Asian countries (Japan and China mostly) higher education as reflected in the knowledge socialism narratives. Xiyuan as (...) the lead author, co-editing with Woraport and Stefan, assigned each section to other authors and successfully devoted themself to organizing, proofreading, and revising the paper. Through a month of collective work, the final version of the paper elaborates on the contribution of East Asian creative universities and the economy as a whole to the knowledge socialism through co(labor)ation, with implications to the creative labors cultivation and shifted roles of students. (shrink)

Zhi xing tian xia -- Yi xing tian xia -- Cheng xing tian xia -- Ren xing tian xia -- He xing tian xia -- Li xing tian xia.

本书从中国传统美学的生命诉求与境域缘在构成,中国美学思想之境域缘在构成论与原点范畴,"致虚""守静"思想与审美缘在构成论,"有无相生"说与缘在构成域之开放性,"阴阳"观与缘在构成思想,"万物化生"构成 思想与审美境域缘在构成说,"与'道'合一"说与缘在构成论,"诚"范畴与审美缘在构成论,审美缘在构成论的文化思想渊源,缘在构成域之审美精神等方面,对"中国美学的审美境域缘在构成论"进行了深入,全面的考察 和研究.

秉春秋之筆 明善惡之辨 ——西漢．董仲舒 本書之成書為研究董仲舒哲學思想之論文集，其研究所據之資料為史漢之〈董仲舒傳〉，董氏之《春秋繁露》。其內容涵蓋董仲舒天人合一之思想、知識論、董氏春秋倫理判斷，以及道德論等。作者在研究中盡力指出董氏所以錯 謬之邏輯推論，以「證偽」，亦襯托其古「董」之精美之處。在中國古代聖賢中所倡言的天人相合的理論裡，不乏有精闢之論，然而其中有其系統而最為專精者，在古代哲人中，則莫過於董仲舒之「天人合一」之論，是以作者對 是事關心而研究焉。.

Shang juan. Li shi juan = The volume of historical institutions -- xia juan. Jing shen juan = The volume of ethical spirit.

本书以仁学和儒学相对比,用“仁学”一词专指孔孟伦理学,以区分于古代儒教经学和宋明理学,全书依据现代理论观念对仁学的结构、意义和功能提出了全新的解释。.

李覯是北宋著名的思想家、教育家、文學家。年輕時，他以康國濟民為意，精心撰寫文章，希望引起朝廷主政者的注意。因科場不利，自三十五歲便退居家鄉，專事寫作和教育，成為當時江南著名學者。李覯是宋代儒家功利學派 的代表，主張義利統一、義利並行，也是李覯重建了儒家功利主義傳統。 作者對李覯政治思想的考察，除了以宋代社會政治危機與變革為背景，也以宋學興起為背景。不僅仔細檢視了李覯對前人思想資源的利用，也突出了他在構建起理論體系的過程中所實現的學術方法變革。 全書共分為七個大章節，首章談作者的研究方法與前人對李覯之研究，以大陸學者和臺灣學者為例子；第二章談李覯的生平、思想及著作，對李覯有更進一步的認識，並還原了宋代的科舉制度；第三章談李覯政治思想的時代背景 ，分析宋代重文輕武的利弊與當時朝廷面臨的危機；第四章談《周易》、《周禮》等古籍對李覯思想的影響，以及李覯對孟子、荀子主張的批判與繼承；第五章談李覯的政治思想特點，講述其理想的社會模式、捍衛儒學的立場、 反對過度迷信佛法的主張；第六章談李覯政治思想的影響、儒家功利主義發展，以王安石變法評述李覯的政制主張；第七章談李覯思想的現代價值，呼籲當代人應遵循「義利統一」、「義利並行」的原則，同步進行社會的公平正 義和經濟發展。.

本书是一部讨论“哲学理论创新与构建和谐社会关系”的文集,作者致力于发掘传统哲学资源,梳理和谐哲学思想的发展轨迹;对一些与生态和谐、社会和谐有关的现代哲学思潮进行评析;对辩证矛盾观的内涵进行反思,探讨了 构建和谐社会的思维方式与方法论。.

It is commonly assumed that historical materialism was first developed by Karl Marx, whose philosophy is often equated with this idea. The following paper challenges this opinion by showing that historical materialism, understood as a general position within the philosophy of history, can be traced back to two generally unheralded Chinese thinkers: Liu Zongyuan (773–819) and Li Gou (1009–1059). Historical materialism is here understood as a standpoint built on three tenets: (1) a belief in the dependence of culture on the (...) material fundaments of social life; (2) the interpretation of human history through the prism of structural transformations; and (3) understanding political and economic relationships in terms of antagonism between social groups. After elaborating upon the presence of these tenets in the thought of Liu and Li, the paper analyzes the influence of their ideas and, finally, points out the main differences between the premodern and modern forms of historical materialism. (shrink)

本书内容有:政治的道德本性、政治道德理念的结构、政治目的道德定位、政治手段的道德制约、政府行为的道德限制、公民行为的道德约束等。.

本书对当代中国社会如何合理地组织道德生活,以及相应地发展何种伦理学类型的问题,提出一种建设性的构想,并从道德结构、伦理学类型、应用伦理和人生哲学等方面进行了系统的阐述.

◎ 以政治思想使的角度切入，完整剖析荀子的政治思想淵源、構造及特色。 ◎ 闡明荀子如何將早期儒、墨的倫理論辯，提升為分析國家社會原理的禮治論。 ◎ 理解漢朝後中國國家體制的設計藍圖，必須從理解荀子禮治論開始。 本書以「禮治」與「綜合」為切入點，闡明《荀子》書中政治思想的淵源、構造以及特色，並對荀子的生平、其文本的流傳以及戰國時代「禮」概念的發展等問題，進行完整且系統性的說明。 作者將戰國時代的思想演變，分成以孔子至孟子的早期儒家與墨家思想為主要內容的「倫理論辯」階段，和以慎到、田駢等稷下學者與道家等戰國中、晚期思想為主要內容的「分析論述」階段，並主張荀子以「禮」概念綜合了此 兩種思想潮流。經由闡述「禮」概念的各種功能，荀子將當時備受懷疑的倫理工夫之效能，以及過度抽象化的各種政治論辯內容，重新界定為每個人都能夠實踐的倫理準則；早期儒墨的「倫理論辯」，由此提升為富有分析國家社 會原理的「禮治論」。而因為荀子的禮治論兼有豐富的倫理實踐意涵，以及分析國家社會的理論意涵，其後更成為漢朝建立國家制度與倫理基礎時的設計藍圖。 經由作者條分縷析地說明，讀者當能對荀子的禮治思想有更深入的了解，進而掌握其整體面貌。.

Ben shu yi Ming ru Li Cai de jiang xue huo dong yu xue pai jian gou wei zhong xin, tan tao cong shi liu shi ji chu dao shi qi shi ji mo li xue qun ti zhong xin xing xue shuo he xue pai de chan sheng, chuan bo, kuo zhan yu chuan cheng de mo shi, bing zhuo zhong cong si xiang shi de jiao du jie shi zhe zhong mo shi chan sheng he yun xing de (...) si xiang gen yuan yu nei zai dong li. Quan shu zheng wen gong qi zhang, zhu yao nei rong fen wei shang xia liang bian, shang bian yi hong guan zong lun de fang shi, cong li xue jing dian "Da xue" de wen ben bian dong he quan shi jing zheng qie ru, tan tao zhong wan Ming li xue xue shuo he xue pai jian gou de li lun gen ju; xia bian yi Li Cai de "zhi xiu" xue shuo ji qi jiang xue huo dong zuo wei ge an yan jiu, tan tao li xue xue shuo he xue pai de chuan bo ji chuan cheng de she hui hua tu jing. (shrink)

2020年，新冠肺炎病毒在全球爆發，威脅公眾健康、打亂生活節奏、衝擊社會經濟。病毒沒有種族，也沒有國界，人們在共同面對這一瘟疫大挑戰時，健康價值固然重要，與此同時，倫理道德和人類價值如平等、自由、公正 等同樣不能忽略。 本書收錄二十多篇，由兩岸三地的學者撰寫的重大議題文章，從基礎倫理、防控倫理、法律倫理、醫療倫理、責任倫理、關懷倫理六個角度，探討如何在大疫當前的困境下，建構中國生命倫理學。書中提出多個引人反思道德傳統 、倫理精神和價值取向的問題，如防控措施與個人權利應如何平衡？健康碼的追蹤程序能否保障個人隱私權？醫療資源稀缺情況下限制老人的醫療供給是否合理？如何保障一線醫護人員的基本安全？ 作者期望通過本書補充生命倫理學的「缺如」，並為健全社會防疫意識、完善醫療衛生體系、增強道德研究，以及建構具有中國特色的生命倫理學盡一分力。在此疫情仍然嚴峻的今日，絕對值得一讀。.