Results for 'Giovanni Tuzet Damiano Canale'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  20
    Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet .The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2014 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (2):228-230.
  2.  44
    On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):31-43.
    We remark that the A Contrario Argument is an ambiguous technique of justification of judicial decisions. We distinguish two uses and versions of it, strong and weak, taking as example the normative sentence “Underprivileged citizens are permitted to apply for State benefit”. According to the strong version, only underprivileged citizens are permitted to apply for State benefit, so stateless persons are not. According to the weak, the law does not regulate the position of underprivileged stateless persons in this respect. We (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  54
    On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
    In this paper we consider whether a pragmatics of semantic content can be a useful approach to legal interpretation. More broadly speaking, since a pragmatic conception of meaning is a component of inferential semantics, we consider whether an inferentialist approach to legal interpretation can be useful in dealing with some problems of this important aspect of law. In other words, we ask whether Legal Inferentialism is a suitable conception for legal interpretation. In Section 1 we briefly consider the semantics/pragmatics debate (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  30
    The a Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (4):499-509.
    The A Simili Argument draws the conclusion that a target case has a normative property Q since it shares a relevant property P with a source case. It can be seen as a complex inference constituted by three inferential steps: An abduction of the relevant property P , an induction of the class having that property, and a deduction of the target's having property Q . A major problem of this argument is the characterization of the property relevance. The standard (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  32
    What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):197-210.
    Several legal arguments use the notion of ratio legis in order to sustain a normative conclusion, in particular the argument from analogy and some forms of teleological argumentation. However, determining the ratio is often a difficult and controversial task. In this paper we look firstly at the speech acts typically performed by legal practitioners in order to determine the ratio and, secondly, we take into account the argumentative commitments they undertake in so doing and the argumentative constraints put on them. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  8
    Analogical Reasoning and Extensive Interpretation.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2017 - Latest Issue of Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 103 (1):117-135.
    Extensive interpretation of legal provisions is in tension with the prohibition of reasoning by analogy in criminal law, for it is unclear what the difference is between the two. Some scholars claim that they differ from a theoretical point of view, since they do not have the same argumentative structure. On the other hand, the two come to the same result starting from the same legal materials: they justify the extension of a regulation to a case that is not explicitly (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  7
    What the Legislature Did Not Say.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):249-270.
    The paper is about the uses of the argument from legislative counterfactual intention, in the field of legal interpretation and argumentation. After presenting the argument from intention in general, it distinguishes the varities of the argument from counterfactual legislative intention and discusses their justification conditions.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  5
    Introduction to Schauer and The Force of Law.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (2):160-163.
    The paper introduces the debate, hosted by the present Journal, on Schauer's book The Force of Law. It points out some starting points of the discussion and puts into question the status of contemporary jurisprudence.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  1
    Interpretation Without Truth: A Reply to Critics.Pierluigi Chiassoni - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (1):139-152.
    Brian Bix, Damiano Canale, Timothy Endicott, Alessio Sardo, Frederick Schauer, and Giovanni Tuzet did me the honour of reading and critically commenting Interpretation without Truth (in the followi...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. The Italian Pragmatists: Between Allies and Enemies.Giovanni Maddalena & Giovanni Tuzet (eds.) - 2020 - Brill | Rodopi.
    The Italian Pragmatists were a group of philosophers in the early 20th century. They gathered around the journal _Leonardo_, which was published in Florence. This volume emphasizes what they all shared, as well as their value for philosophy and culture.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  3
    The Sign of the Four: Italian Pragmatists Retold1.Giovanni Maddalena & Giovanni Tuzet - 2011 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3 (1):147-162.
    This paper is a contribution to the study of the four classical Italian pragmatists: Papini, Prezzolini, Vailati and Calderoni. They are seen more as representatives of a pragmatist movement than as singular systematic thinkers. The center of Italian pragma-tism was the periodical, Leonardo, where these authors discussed and presented an origi-nal and provocative understanding of pragmatist philosophy. Thier understanding of pragmatist philosophy has often been underestimated by the subsequent literature. They showed a good comprehension of the novelty brought by American (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  13
    Pragmatism and Vagueness: The Venetian Lectures; Edited by Giovanni Tuzet by Claudine Tiercelin.David W. Agler - 2020 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55 (4):458-463.
    Take a hypothetical sequence of human beings ordered by height from tallest to shortest. Make sure there is no more than a difference of a millimeter between each person and make sure the tallest person is clearly tall and the shortest person is clearly not tall. Now consider the following argument: P1 A person of height n is tall ; P2 For any height n, if n is tall, then n–1mm is tall ; C Therefore, a person of height n (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  15
    I Pragmatisti Italiana: Tra Alleati E Nemici By Giovanni Maddalena and Giovanni Tuzet.Fernando Zalamea - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (4):711.
  14.  45
    I pragmatisti italiani a cura di Giovanni Maddalena e Giovanni Tuzet.Francesca Bordogna, Massimo Ferrari & Christopher Hookway - 2009 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 22 (1):237-252.
    Comments on G. Maddalena and G. Tuzet, editors, I Pragmatisti Italiani. Tra Alleati e Nemeci (Italian Pragmatists. Between Enemies and Allies). Milano: Albo Versorio, 2007.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. A Blind Spot in the Theories of Legal Interpretation.Damiano Canale - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (1):130-138.
    Interpretation without Truth is the result of thirty years of research that Pierluigi Chiassoni has devoted to legal interpretation and legal reasoning. More generally, the book represents one of t...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  7
    The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making.Damiano Canale - 2021 - Law and Philosophy 40 (5):509-543.
    It is well known that experts’ opinion and testimony take on a decisive weight in judicial fact-finding, raising issues and perplexities that have long been under scholarly scrutiny. In this paper I argue that expert’s opinions have a much wider impact on legal decision-making. In particular, they may generate a problem that I will call ‘the opacity of law’. A legal text, such as a statute or regulation, becomes opaque if a legal authority is not able to grasp its full (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  28
    Consequences of Pragmatic Conceptualism: On the Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.Damiano Canale - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):171-186.
    Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to address some of the main issues of contemporary jurisprudential methodology by considering the contribution of Jules Coleman to this subject. After a description of Coleman's methodological approach and a clarification of its philosophical background, the paper focuses on some related problems, such as the relation between linguistic meaning and conceptual content, the nature of legal concepts, the different aspects of the normativity of content, and the revisability of conceptual truths.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18. La Pratica Dei Valori: Nodi Fra Conoscenza E Azione.Giovanni Tuzet - 2012 - Quodlibet.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  17
    Pragmatic Aspects of Legislative Intent.Damiano Canale & Francesca Poggi - 2019 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 64 (1):125-138.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  13
    Is Law Grounded in Joint Action?Damiano Canale - 2014 - Rechtstheorie 45 (3):289-312.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21.  4
    Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making.Damiano Canale - forthcoming - Law and Philosophy:1-1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  3
    Walled Borders, Territoriality and Sovereignty: A Typology.Damiano Canale - 2021 - Athena 1 (1):37-57.
    Legal scholarship has so far paid little attention to the concept of border, which is one of the reasons for the lack of clarity regarding the characteristics of public borders at the present time. This paper aims to contribute to fill this gap by looking at an apparently eccentric phenomenon regarding the contemporary transformation of state borders: the so-called border walls. At a first sight, border walls seem to reiterate the traditional functions of state borders. But their rising up as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  47
    Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro’s Challenge. [REVIEW]Damiano Canale - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (4):409-441.
    This article critically focuses on the methodological aspects of Scott Shapiro’s book Legality . Indeed Shapiro’s book sets out several original theses about not only the nature of law and the main problems of jurisprudence, but also about how the nature of law can be discovered by jurisprudence. In this sense, the method of inquiry adopted by Shapiro can be considered as one of the most challenging outcomes of his research. The article is divided into two parts. In the first (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  12
    More Votes, More Irrationality.Giovanni Tuzet - 2019 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 64 (1):61-78.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25. Judicial Fictions and Constitutive Speech.Alessio Sardo & Giovanni Tuzet - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (1):121-129.
    In his tightly argued, thought-provoking volume Interpretation without Truth, Pierluigi Chiassoni offers a groundbreaking, reductionist account of judicial fictions.1 Under Chiassoni’s view, judici...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  6
    The Opacity of Law. On the Impact of Experts' Opinion on Legal Decision-Making.Damiano Canale - forthcoming - Law and Philosophy:1-35.
    It is well known that experts’ opinion and testimony take on a decisive weight in judicial fact-finding, raising issues and perplexities that have long been under scholarly scrutiny. In this paper I argue that expert’s opinions have a much wider impact on legal decision-making. In particular, they may generate a problem that I will call ‘the opacity of law’. A legal text, such as a statute or regulation, becomes opaque if a legal authority is not able to grasp its full (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Ricoeur e la dialettica del riconoscimento.Damiano Canale - 2000 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 77 (3):292-322.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. La Precomprensione Dell’Interprete È Arbitraria?Damiano Canale - 2006 - Etica E Politica 8 (1):1-42.
    “Preunderstanding” is the core of the theoretical framework developed by legal hermeneutics. Legal interpretation is necessary guided by the know-how, the presuppositions and the attitudes of the interpreter. But if this is the case, how can we distinguish between a legitimate and a not legitimate preunderstanding, and also between a good and a bad interpretation? The paper tries to adress this question analyzing the structure of preunderstanding from the point of view of both legal hermeneutics and philosophical hermeneutics. The paper (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  8
    Projectual Abduction.Giovanni Tuzet - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):151-160.
    Projectual abduction is the inference drawing the means to achieve an end. Planning a course of action is an inferential task and we claim that the relevant inference is abduction. We distinguish projectual abduction from epistemic abduction. While epistemic abduction aims to determine an explanatory relation, projectual abduction aims to determine a teleological relation. It is important to remind in any case that abduction does not stand by itself: as is true for epistemic abduction, projectual abduction has to be developed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30. Experts and Expertise. Interdisciplinary Issues.Elisabetta Lalumera & Giovanni Tuzet - 2015 - Humana Mente 8 (28).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  12
    Serena Tomasi .Teorie dell’argomentazione e processo penale. Un’analisi comparata delle principali teorie argomentative contemporanee con profili applicativi al processo penale. [REVIEW]Damiano Canale - 2014 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (2):224-227.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. On the Absence of Evidence.Giovanni Tuzet - 2015 - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. Responsible For Truth? Peirce on Judgment and Assertion: Responsável Pela Verdade ? Peirce Sobre Juízo E Asserção.Giovanni Tuzet - 2006 - Cognitio 7 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. Legal Abduction: Abdução Legal.Giovanni Tuzet - 2005 - Cognitio 6 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35.  21
    Social Ontology and Legal Practice: A Debate.Giovanni Tuzet - 2014 - Rechtstheorie 45 (3):281-288.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  2
    Crtica o probavnom realizmu.Giovanni Tuzet - 2015 - Revus 25:7-10.
    Prema najekstremnijem obliku pravnoga realizma sudske odluke ovise o tome što su suci jeli za doručak. Nejasno je je li itko od američkih pravnih realista takvo što zaista i tvrdio. Ponekad se to ekstremno stajalište pripisuje Jeromeu Franku, što nije iznenađujuće s obzirom da se Franka obično smatra najradikalnijim, najskeptičnijim i najciničnijim među tim realistima. Tvrdi se zapravo da su kritičari američkog pravnog realizma promovirali «frankifikaciju» toga pokreta upravo kako bi ga učini..
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  1
    Una Concepción pragmatista de Los derechos.Giovanni Tuzet - 2013 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 39:11-36.
    El artículo se pregunta qué sentido tiene la práctica de conferir o reconocer derechos y sostiene que son sus consecuencias lo que nos interesa y lo que hace sensata la práctica relacionada con ellos. La virtud de esta tesis es que permite aterrizar el vocabulario aéreo de los derechos y que invita a determinar sus contenidos específicos con la mayor precisión posible. Se trata de una tesis realista y pragmatista respecto de los derechos. Realista, porque busca comprender en qué consiste (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  2
    A Short Note on Digestive Realism.Giovanni Tuzet - 2015 - Revus 25:11-14.
    The most extreme form of legal realism says that judicial decisions depend on what judges had for breakfast. It is unclear whether any of the American realists really claimed anything of that sort. Sometimes Jerome Frank is charged with that extreme view, which is not surprising given that Frank is generally considered to be the most radical, skeptical and cynic among those realists. It has been said in fact that critics of American legal realism have promoted a “Frankification” of this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  20
    Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification.Giovanni Tuzet - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):91-109.
    The paper provides a conceptual distinction between evidence assessment criteria and standards of proof. Evidence must be assessed in order to check whether it satisfies a relevant standard of proof, and the assessment is operated with some criterion; so both criteria and standards are necessary for fact-finding. In addition to this conceptual point, the article addresses three main questions: Why do some scholars and decision-makers take assessment criteria as standards of proof and vice versa? Why do systems differ as to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  11
    ‘Suspension of Disbelief’: A Coherentist Theory of Fiction.Giovanni Tuzet - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (2):455-478.
    Why do we say that a certain fiction is good, or even credible? The paper discusses the issue of fiction acceptability or credibility, with reference to the literary and legal domains in particular. Coleridge claimed that ‘poetic faith’ involves a suspension of disbelief. If he was right, to be good a literary fiction must be credible. Literary credibility does not mean truth or truthfulness. The paper contends that it means, in some senses to be specified, coherence; hence it provides a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Le menti non sono documenti.Giovanni Tuzet & Andrea Lavazza - 2021 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 12 (3):212-224.
    Riassunto : Per la teoria della documentalità gli oggetti sociali sono atti iscritti e per la teoria della mente estesa le menti si estendono a processi o dispositivi esterni al corpo. Pur per motivi diversi, le due teorie convergono nel ridurre le differenze fra menti e documenti, e hanno a loro supporto la dimensione semiotica di menti e documenti; eppure, in una certa lettura, tali teorie risultano implausibili se si considera che le proprietà delle cose che chiamiamo “menti” non sono (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Oltre la filosofia linguistica?Giovanni Tuzet - 2004 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 1 (1):147-158.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Pragmatism, Logic, and Law by Frederic R. Kellogg.Giovanni Tuzet - 2022 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57 (3):397-401.
    Frederic Kellogg has already published several works on legal pragmatism and on Oliver Wendell Holmes in particular.1 In this volume, he focuses on the early history of Holmes' views, on his readings in law and philosophy, and his interests in science in the years of the Metaphysical Club. Drawing on sources like Francis Bacon, John Stuart Mill and Chauncey Wright, Holmes developed an inductive approach to common law reasoning; eventually, as I discuss below, this approach needed refinement when he engaged (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Volontà generale e costituzione: la riserva del senso.Giovanni Tuzet - 2001 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 78 (3):301-350.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Cognitive Fictions.Giovanni Tuzet - 2006 - In L. Magnani (ed.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering. College Publications. pp. 215--226.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46. Economic Consequences for Lawyers.Fabrizio Esposito & Giovanni Tuzet - 2020 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):368-398.
    This article moves from the premise that a bilateral relationship between law and economics requires the contribution of the theory of legal argumentation. The article shows that, to be legally relevant, economic consequences have to be incorporated into interpretive arguments. In this regard, the jurisprudential preface strategy proposed by Craswell goes in the right direction, but begs the question of why the legally relevant consequences have to be assessed in terms of total welfare maximization instead of, in the EU context (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  1
    Analogía e interpretación teleológica. Un caso aragonés: ¿palas eólicas como ramas?Giovanni Tuzet - 2022 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 53.
    El trabajo presenta un caso civil donde se muestra la necesidad de aclarar la ratio legis de una regulación legislativa para determinar la legitimidad de su aplicación analógica. Esto significa que el argumento analógico requiere una interpretación teleológica de los textos normativos pertinentes, para determinar la ratio de una regulación y luego proceder a una posible integración analógica del derecho. En la medida en que la interpretación teleológica no sólo sirve para determinar el contenido de un texto a la luz (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  10
    Metaphilosophy of Law.Giovanni Tuzet - 2018 - Jurisprudence 9 (3):631-635.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  3
    Truthful Liars: How They and Other Oddities Are Possible.Giovanni Tuzet - 2021 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57 (2):227-247.
  50.  3
    The Policy of Evidence.Giovanni Tuzet - 2021 - Theoria 87 (6):1418-1443.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000