10 found
Order:
Disambiguations
G. William Domhoff [11]G. Domhoff [2]
  1.  38
    Dreaming and the default network: A review, synthesis, and counterintuitive research proposal.G. William Domhoff & Kieran C. R. Fox - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:342-353.
  2.  43
    Studying dream content using the archive and search engine on DreamBank.net.G. William Domhoff & Adam Schneider - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1238-1247.
    This paper shows how the dream archive and search engine on DreamBank.net, a Web site containing over 22,000 dream reports, can be used to generate new findings on dream content, some of which raise interesting questions about the relationship between dreaming and various forms of waking thought. It begins with studies that draw dream reports from DreamBank.net for studies of social networks in dreams, and then demonstrates the usefulness of the search engine by employing word strings relating to religious and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  3.  34
    Realistic simulation and bizarreness in dream content: past findings and suggestions for future research.G. William Domhoff - 2007 - In D. Barrett & P. McNamara (eds.), The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers. pp. 1--28.
  4.  20
    Corporate political power and US foreign policy, 1981–2002: the role of the policy-planning network.Philip Luther-Davies, Kasia Julia Doniec, Joseph P. Lavallee, Lawrence P. King & G. William Domhoff - 2022 - Theory and Society 51 (4):629-652.
    Recent empirical work has offered strong support for ‘biased pluralism’ and ‘economic elite’ accounts of political power in the United States, according a central role to ‘business interest groups’ as a mechanism through which corporate influence is exerted. Here, we propose an additional channel of influence for corporate interests: the ‘policy-planning network,’ consisting of corporate-dominated foundations, think tanks, and elite policy-discussion groups. To evaluate this assertion, we consider one key policy-discussion group, the Council on Foreign Relations. We first briefly review (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  24
    Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies.David Foulkes & G. William Domhoff - 2014 - Consciousness and Cognition 27:168-171.
  6.  26
    Big money in American politics.G. William Domhoff - 1988 - Theory and Society 17 (4):571-588.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  3
    Corporate-Liberal Theory and the Social Security Act: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.G. William Domhoff - 1987 - Politics and Society 15 (3):297-330.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  50
    Needed: A new theory.G. William Domhoff - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):928-930.
    Dream content is more coherent, consistent over time, and continuous with waking emotional concerns than most brainstem-driven theories of dreaming allow, but dreaming probably has no adaptive function. A new neurocognitive perspective focusing on the forebrain system of dream generation should begin with the findings on dream content in adults and the developmental nature of dreaming in children. [Hobson et al.; Nielsen; Revonsuo; Solms; Vertes & Eastman].
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  36
    Watergate: Conflict and antagonisms within the power elite. [REVIEW]G. William Domhoff - 1974 - Theory and Society 1 (1):99-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  5
    The policy-planning capacity of the American corporate community: corporations, policy-oriented nonprofits, and the inner circle in 1935–1936 and 2010–2011. [REVIEW]Tom Mills & G. William Domhoff - 2023 - Theory and Society 52 (6):1067-1096.
    Using a combination of network analysis and descriptive statistics, this study examines the extent to which six important and longstanding policy-oriented nonprofit organizations — foundations, think tanks, and policy-discussion groups — were connected via their directors with the 250 largest corporations in the United States in 1935–1936 and 2010–2011. The results demonstrate that the six nonprofit organizations included in the study were well integrated into corporate networks in both periods, and had an even greater integrative role in 2010–2011 than they (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark