13 found
Order:
  1.  26
    Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric.Frank Boardman, Nancy M. Cavender & Howard Kahane - 2017 - [Boston, MA]: Cengage. Edited by Nancy Cavender & Howard Kahane.
    An introduction to informal logic, critical thinking and rhetoric utilizing actual public discourse .
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  2.  25
    The Strange Case of the Stand-Up Special.Frank Boardman - 2018 - Israeli Journal for Humor Research.
    Stand-up specials seem to resemble news reporting and documentary film in that they appear prima facie to be mere documentation of an event designed to give viewers the sense of what happened at a place at a time. Closer examination, however, throws doubt upon this transparency claim and it is argued that filmic realism is not the proper lens through which to understand stand-up specials, that they represent a more artistic medium in which the director of the special needs to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  51
    Evaluating Stand‐Up Specials.Frank Boardman - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):57-64.
    Stand-up specials are not identical to the sets they contain. Nor are they of a kind with either fiction films or documentaries. I argue here that the properties of specials that make them ontologically distinct also demand that we treat them as distinct for the purpose of their evaluation. I then offer some evaluative criteria for specials as well as suggestions for becoming better critics of specials.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  56
    What Is a Stand Up Special?Frank Boardman - 2021 - Aesthetic Investigations 5 (1):51-63.
    The stand-up special is growing cultural significance just as it is maturing and becoming more distinct as an art form. Philosophical treatments of the special are therefore neither frivolous nor redundant. I argue here that such inquiry can be aided by a definitional account of “special” and that an essential definition – if one is available- would serve us best. I then offer a candidate definition of this kind and reply to some likely objections to it.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  71
    Realism about Film and Realism in Films.Frank Boardman - 2020 - Film and Philosophy 24:43-62.
    Realism has a significant place in the history of film theory. The claim that film is essentially a realistic art form has been employed to justify the art-status of films as well as the distinctness of film as a form. André Bazin and others once used realist ontologies of film to try to establish realist teleologies and universal critical standards. I briefly sketch this history before considering the prospects for various versions of realism: Bazin’s, as well as Kendall Walton’s and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  52
    Film Ontology: Extension, Criteria and Candidates.Frank Boardman - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 3-27.
    What sort of thing is film? Before we can answer this question, we’ll have to first determine which things count as “films” in the relevant sense and work out what we ought to look for in an acceptable answer. There is little consensus among philosophers of film on any stage of this process. Here I make the case for a particular understanding of “film” to investigate as well as a particular set of criteria to use in that investigation. I then (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  13
    An Argument (Many) Films Make.Frank Boardman - 2016 - Film and Philosophy 20:19-31.
    A number of recently-offered examples demonstrate that it is possible for films to be works of philosophy, but do not speak to just how many films are. Here I suggest one way in which a great number of films could be reasonably interpreted this way. My focus is on what I take to be our most crucial criterion for a film’s being philosophy: that it must present a philosophical argument. I present here a form that is plausibly shared by a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  48
    Back in Style: A New Interpretation of Danto's Style Matrix.Frank Boardman - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):441-448.
    A number of objections to the style matrix that Arthur Danto introduced in “The Artworld” seem to have quelled most discussion of it. So telling have these arguments been that Danto himself later recanted the idea entirely. This situation is somewhat unfortunate. It may be that Danto's own interpretation of the style matrix is not tenable, but I believe we can articulate an alternative reading of it that escapes the aforementioned objections. While the interpretation I suggest cannot provide all that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  21
    High-Cost Art.Frank Boardman - 2021 - Washington University Review of Philosophy 1:26-33.
    Certain artworks are––whatever else they are––statements about the value of art. A particularly striking form of such a statement is made by a class of artworks we can call “high-cost art.” High-cost artworks are those with greater costs relative to benefits for their artists or displayers. I will argue here that those art forms that are most likely to include high-cost works are particularly effective at communicating artistic value-claims, and suggest that by so championing the value of art, these artworks (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Moral Value and Moral Psychology in Twain’s ‘Carnival of Crime’.Frank Boardman - 2017 - In Alan H. Goldman (ed.), Mark Twain and Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The story in "The Facts Concerning the Recent Carnival of Crime in Connecticut" and its telling are above all funny, but Twain himself was keenly interested in its philosophical content. Writing about the first reading of “Carnival” Twain referred to the “exasperating metaphysical question which I mean to lay before them in the disguise of a literary extravaganza.” There are at least two candidates for the operative “metaphysical question,” both of them quite “exasperating.” The first concerns the origin and valuation (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. The Cognitive Value of Fiction: Two Models.Frank Boardman - 2016 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 35 (3).
    A number of current controversies involve questions about the cognitive value of fiction. In each of these contexts, we find skepticism about what might be called the “strong thesis,” that we can non-trivially gain determinate propositional knowledge from fictions by virtue of their narrative contents. I offer two ways in which fictions can (and often do) provide us with propositional knowledge in just this way. I make the case that these models help answer much of the skepticism mentioned above. I (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Weitz's Legacy.Frank Boardman - 2015 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 7 (1).
    One common way of framing the recent history of definitional theories of art has it that Wittgensteinian challenges to the definitional project were not successful in establishing the impossibility of a successful definition, but they were successful in providing limits on the kinds of theories that can work. A key part of this story concerns Morris Weitz’s argument that “art” is indefinable because art is – as he calls it – an “open concept”. The argument has since been refuted by (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  87
    The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Second Edition, edited by Gideon Rosen, Alex Byrne, Joshua Cohen, Elizabeth Harman, and Seana Shiffrin. [REVIEW]Frank Boardman - 2019 - Teaching Philosophy 42 (1):57-60.