Results for 'Fran��oise Vinel'

893 found
Order:
  1. Philosopher En Franðcais Langue de la Philosophie Et Langue Nationale.Jean-franðcois Mattâei & Evandro Agazzi - 2001
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  40
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Mark Aakhus - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):489-492.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Ubuntu Humanity and Community Building for Human Growth: Sustainable Development in Africa's Cultural Depiction.Frans Dokman - 2023 - In Bolaji Bateye, Mahmoud Masaeli, Louise Müller & A. C. M. Roothaan (eds.), Beauty in African thought: critical perspectives on the Western idea of development. Lexington Books.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  2
    Heidegger and Practical Philosophy.Fran?ois Raffoul & David Pettigrew (eds.) - 2002 - State University of New York Press.
    Leading scholars address the ethical and practical dimensions of Heidegger's thought.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  5.  21
    Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    With the advent of CRISPR gene-editing technology, designer babies have become a reality. Françoise Baylis insists that scientists alone cannot decide the terms of this new era in human evolution. Members of the public, with diverse interests and perspectives, must have a role in determining our future as a species.
    No categories
  6.  60
    The Role of Virtue in Descartes' Ethical Theory, Or: Was Descartes a Virtue Ethicist?Frans Svensson - forthcoming - History of Philosophy Quarterly.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  23
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   100 citations  
  8.  6
    Waartoe Wetenschap?Frans W. Saris - 2007 - Leiden University Press.
    In Waartoe Wetenschap? onderzoekt Frans W. Saris de wetenschap in evolutionair perspectief en hij bepleit een radical enlightenment in een dertiental essays en een toneeltekst waarin zulke uiteenlopende wetenschappers verschijnen als ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  25
    The Coming Community.Fran Bartkowski & Giorgio Agamben - 1997 - Substance 26 (2):125.
  10.  14
    Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion.Frans Eemeren - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):153-171.
    This theoretical expose explores the complex notion of argumentative style, which has so far been largely neglected in argumentation theory. After an introduction of the problems involved, the theoretical tools for identifying the properties of the discourse in which an argumentative style manifests itself are explained from a pragma-dialectical perspective and a theoretical definition of argumentative style is provided that does full justice to its role in argumentative discourse. The article concludes with a short reflection upon the next steps that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  11.  72
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
    In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  12. FRANS DE WAAL Harvard University Press, 1989, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US $29.95 Hardbound, $12.95 Softcover, 294 Pp., Index. [REVIEW]Allan Combs - 1991 - World Futures 32:269.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Interpréter le psaume 23 (22): Sens littéral, sens historique.Françoise Vinel - 2009 - Revue des Sciences Religieuses 83 (3).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  33
    Frans H. Van Eemeren (2012): Maniobras Estratégicas En El Discurso Argumentativo. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Editorial Plaza y Valdés (Series “Theoria Cum Praxi”, No. 9). Spanish Translation, by Cristián Santibáñez and María Elena Molina, Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren (2010): Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (Series “Argumentation in Context”, No. 2). [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):129-132.
    Each one of the five books authored or co-authored by Frans van Eemeren which have so far been translated into Spanish clearly fulfills a different role. Following the chronological order, we first have Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984; Spanish translation 2013), a book that contains the theoretical spadework in the field of pragmatics on which the whole edifice of pragma-dialectics is erected. Then follows Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1992; Spanish translation 2002, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  31
    Learning to Be Human.Fran Conroy - 1990 - The Personalist Forum 6 (1):27-49.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. For Reason’s Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  17. Argumentation Studies’ Five Estates.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  18.  10
    Open Quotation.FranÇ Recanati - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):637-687.
    The issues addressed in philosophical papers on quotation generally concern only a particular type of quotation, which I call 'closed quotation'. The other main type, 'open quotation', is ignored, and this neglect leads to bad theorizing. Not only is a general theory of quotation out of reach: the specific phenomenon of closed quotation itself cannot be properly understood if it is not appropriately situated within the kind to which it belongs. Once the distinction between open and closed quotation has been (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  19.  18
    Learning to Be Human: Confucian Resources for Person-Centered Education.Fran Conroy - 1990 - The Personalist Forum 6 (1):27-49.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  9
    Pluriform Accommodation: Justice Beyond Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion.Fran Levrau - 2017 - Res Philosophica 95 (1):151-178.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. Democracy and Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  22.  5
    Women's Memories in a Depressed Steel Valley: An Attempt to Deconstruct the Imaginings of Steel-Working Lorraine.Virginie Vinel - 2010 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 12 (2):113-125.
    This paper is based on a research conducted between 2004 and 2006 and dealing with the memories of women in a steel valley struck by depression since the seventies, in the North-Eastern part of France. The imagery of steel-producing Lorraine coalesced in a rather standardized way around the figure of the steelworker working at the blast furnace. This research and the exhibition which followed from it, highlighted the activities of women, in the working place as well as in the domestic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  24.  74
    Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, a taxonomy is proposed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  25.  6
    The Inevitability of Genetic Enhancement Technologies.FranÇoise Baylis & Jason Scott Robert - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (1):1-26.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  26.  3
    General Theory of Victims.Fran?ois Laruelle - 2015 - Polity.
    The most accessible expression of François Laruelles non-philosophical, or non-standard, thought, _General Theory of Victims_ forges a new role for contemporary philosophers and intellectuals by rethinking their relation to victims. A key text in recent continental philosophy, it is indispensable for anyone interested in the debates surrounding materialism, philosophy of religion, and ethics. Transforming Joseph de Maistres adage that the executioner is the cornerstone of society, _General Theory of Victims_ instead proposes the victim as the cornerstone of humanity and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach Reviewed By. [REVIEW]David Godden - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25 (1):72-75.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  51
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules Content Type Journal Article Pages 375-381 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6 Authors Dale Hample, University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  59
    Mechanistic Explanation and Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics.Joachim Frans & Erik Weber - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (2):231-248.
    Although there is a consensus among philosophers of mathematics and mathematicians that mathematical explanations exist, only a few authors have proposed accounts of explanation in mathematics. These accounts fit into the unificationist or top-down approach to explanation. We argue that these models can be complemented by a bottom-up approach to explanation in mathematics. We introduce the mechanistic model of explanation in science and discuss the possibility of using this model in mathematics, arguing that using it does not presuppose a Platonist (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  30. Une approche déflationniste de la liberté de la volonté: un autre visage de Kant.Fran Schroeter - 1994 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 41 (1-2):116-136.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  35
    Unificatory Understanding and Explanatory Proofs.Joachim Frans - 2021 - Foundations of Science 26 (4):1105-1127.
    One of the central aims of the philosophical analysis of mathematical explanation is to determine how one can distinguish explanatory proofs from non-explanatory proofs. In this paper, I take a closer look at the current status of the debate, and what the challenges for the philosophical analysis of explanatory proofs are. In order to provide an answer to these challenges, I suggest we start from analysing the concept understanding. More precisely, I will defend four claims: understanding is a condition for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  33.  16
    Frans van Schooten der Jungere.D. T. Whiteside - 1964 - History of Science 3:147.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  77
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
    According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  35.  5
    Personally Perceived Publication Pressure: Revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire by Using Work Stress Models.Frans Jeroen Oort, Joeri K. Tijdink, Marije Esther Evalien de Goede & Tamarinde L. Haven - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).
    BackgroundThe emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionally considered an incentive to produce high-quality work, but there are unwanted side-effects of this competition like publication pressure. To measure the effect of publication pressure on researchers, the Publication Pressure Questionnaire was developed. Upon using the PPQ, some issues came to light that motivated a revision.MethodWe constructed two new subscales based on work stress models using the facet method. We administered the revised (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  36. Determiners.Frans Zwarts - 1983 - In Alice G. B. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics. Foris Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37.  17
    The Curious Case of the Spanish Flu.Frans Roes - 2018 - Biological Theory 13 (4):243-245.
    It is often claimed that the exceptional severity of the Spanish flu, one of the most deadly events in recorded human history, is an unsolved mystery. However, even detailed aspects such as its W-shaped mortality curve are well explained by Paul Ewald’s theory of the evolution of virulence. Understanding the causes of the Spanish flu will help to prevent future epidemics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38. Evolutie, Teleologie En Toeval Evolution, Téléologie Et Hasard.Frans Soontiens - 1990 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 82 (1):1-14.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  21
    A Hierarchy or Negative Expressions.Frans Zwarts - 1996 - In H. Wansing (ed.), Negation: A Notion in Focus. W. De Gruyter. pp. 7--169.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  41. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  42.  36
    Reasonable Partiality in Professional Ethics: The Moral Division of Labour.Frans Jacobs - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):141-154.
    Attention is given to a background idea that is often invoked in discussions about reasonable partiality: the idea of a moral division of labour. It is not only a right, but also a duty for professionals to attend (almost) exclusively to the interests of their own clients, because their partial activities are part of an impartial scheme providing for an allocation of professional help to all clients. To clarify that idea, a difference is made between two kinds of division of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  43. Frans de waal. The age of empathy: Nature's lessons for a Kinder society.da Trindade Gabriel Garmendia & Marin Ana Paula Foletto - 2017 - Synesis 9 (1):180-195.
    Resenha de Frans de Waal. The Age of Empathy: Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society. London: Souvenir Press, Paperback Edition, 2011.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Virtue Ethics and the Search for an Account of Right Action.Frans Svensson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):255-271.
    Conceived of as a contender to other theories in substantive ethics, virtue ethics is often associated with, in essence, the following account or criterion of right action: VR: An action A is right for S in circumstances C if and only if a fully virtuous agent would characteristically do A in C. There are serious objections to VR, which take the form of counter-examples. They present us with different scenarios in which less than fully virtuous persons would be acting rightly (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  45.  62
    The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.Frans H. Eemeren - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
    During the past thirty years the pragma-dialectical theorizing has developed in various steps from designing an abstract ideal model for critical discussion to examining strategic manoeuvring in the various argumentative activity types in which argumentative discourse manifests itself in argumentative reality. The response to the theoretical proposals that have been made includes, next to approval, also various kinds of criticisms. This paper explores the nature and thrust of these criticisms. In doing so, a distinction is made between criticisms concerning the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  46.  20
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  47. Explaining Variance in Perceived Research Misbehavior: Results From a Survey Among Academic Researchers in Amsterdam.Frans Oort, Lex Bouter, Brian Martinson, Joeri Tijdink & Tamarinde Haven - 2021 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1).
    BackgroundConcerns about research misbehavior in academic science have sparked interest in the factors that may explain research misbehavior. Often three clusters of factors are distinguished: individual factors, climate factors and publication factors. Our research question was: to what extent can individual, climate and publication factors explain the variance in frequently perceived research misbehaviors?MethodsFrom May 2017 until July 2017, we conducted a survey study among academic researchers in Amsterdam. The survey included three measurement instruments that we previously reported individual results of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48. Eudaimonist Virtue Ethics and Right Action: A Reassessment.Frans Svensson - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (4):321-339.
    My question in this paper concerns what eudaimonist virtue ethics (EVE) might have to say about what makes right actions right. This is obviously an important question if we want to know what (if anything) distinguishes EVE from various forms of consequentialism and deontology in ethical theorizing. The answer most commonly given is that according to EVE, an action is right if and only if it is what a virtuous person would do in the circumstances. However, understood as a claim (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  49.  4
    Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza.Frans Svensson & Martina Reuter (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge.
    The turn of the millennium has been marked by new developments in the study of early modern philosophy. In particular, the philosophy of René Descartes has been reinterpreted in a number of important and exciting ways, specifically concerning his work on the mind-body union, the connection between objective and formal reality, and his status as a moral philosopher. These fresh interpretations have coincided with a renewed interest in overlooked parts of the Cartesian corpus and a sustained focus on the similarities (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50. Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse.F. J. Kauffeld - 1996 - Argumentation 10:129-137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 893