6 found
Order:
  1. Epistemic Norms of Assertion and Action.Mikkel Gerken & Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2020 - In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    The purpose of the present chapter is to survey the work on epistemic norms of action, practical deliberation and assertion and to consider how these norms are interrelated. On a more constructive note, we will argue that if there are important similarities between the epistemic norms of action and assertion, it has important ramifications for the debates over speech acts and harm. Thus, we hope that the chapter will indicate how thinking about assertions as a speech act can benefit from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  27
    Denying Knowledge.Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):36-55.
    Intuitions about contextualist cases such as Cohen’s airport case pose a problem for classical anti-skeptical versions of invariantism. Recently, Tim Black, Jessica Brown, and Patrick Rysiew have argued that the classical invariantist can respond by arguing that pragmatic aspects of epistemic discourse are responsible for the relevant problematic intuitions. This paper identifies the mechanisms of conversational implicature and impliciture as the basic sources of hope for this explanatory strategy. It then argues that neither of these sources provides the classical invariantist (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  11
    What Is Theoretical Knowledge?Søren Harnow Klausen & Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2021 - Theoria 87 (3):559-577.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Moorean Paradoxes, Assertion, and Certainty.Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2021 - In Tadeusz Ciecierski & Paweł Grabarczyk (eds.), Context Dependence in Language, Action, and Cognition. De Gruyter. pp. 7-20.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  18
    Why Not Open the Black Box of Journal Editing in Philosophy? Make Peer Reviews of Published Papers Available.Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell & Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (3):245-257.
    Despite general agreement within philosophy that peer review is indispensable, its fairness and reliability is often questioned. This article suggests that such worries can to a large extent be met by adopting the practice that reviews as well as earlier versions of papers are made publicly available when the final version of a paper is published. This suggestion combines the advantages of transparency with the merits of anonymity of reviewers. While there are obstacles to this suggestion, the article argues that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  2
    Skepticism and Transcendental Arguments From Semantic Externalism.Esben Nedenskov Petersen - 2007 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 42 (1):111-122.