Erin Taylor [5]Erin N. Taylor [1]
See also
Erin Taylor
Washington and Lee University
  1.  88
    A New Conventionalist Theory of Promising.Erin Taylor - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):667-682.
    Conventionalists about promising believe that it is wrong to break a promise because the promisor takes advantage of a useful social convention only to fail to do his part in maintaining it. Anti-conventionalists claim that the wrong of breaking a promise has nothing essentially to do with a social convention. Anti-conventionalists are right that the social convention is not necessary to explain the wrong of breaking most promises. But conventionalists are right that the convention plays an essential role in any (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  81
    For Shame: Feminism, Breastfeeding Advocacy, and Maternal Guilt.Erin N. Taylor & Lora Ebert Wallace - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (1):76-98.
    In this paper, we provide a new framework for understanding infant-feeding-related maternal guilt and shame, placing these in the context of feminist theoretical and psychological accounts of the emotions of self-assessment. Whereas breastfeeding advocacy has been critiqued for its perceived role in inducing maternal guilt, we argue that the emotion women often feel surrounding infant feeding may be better conceptualized as shame in its tendency to involve a negative self-assessment—a failure to achieve an idealized notion of good motherhood. Further, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3.  28
    Rights and Demands: A Foundational Inquiry.Erin Taylor - 2021 - Philosophical Review 130 (1):162-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  4. Irreconcilable Differences.Erin Taylor - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):181-192.
    This paper argues that theoretical consistency and actionguidingness—as these have been formulated in the moral dilemmas debate—do not rule out interpersonal moral conflict. This leaves open the possibility that theoretical consistency and action-guidingness may demand more than what has been traditionally assumed. That question is considered here. Do these resources rule out all-things-considered interpersonal moral conflict in non-consequentialist theories? This paper argues that neither theoretical consistency nor action-guidingness can rule out such conflict, but action-guidingness properly construed provides a desideratum against (...)
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. All Together Now: Conventionalism and Everyday Moral Life.Erin Taylor - manuscript
  6. Securities and Financial Services Law [Book Review].Erin Taylor - 2013 - Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory 227:41.
    Export citation