1.  58
    Women's neuroethics? Why sex matters for neuroethics.Molly C. Chalfin, Emily R. Murphy & Katrina A. Karkazis - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1 – 2.
    The Neuroethics Affinity Group of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities met for the third time in October 2007 to review progress in the field of neuroethics and consider high-impact priorities for the future. Closely aligned with ASBH's own goals of recruiting junior scholars to bioethics and mentoring them to successful careers, the Neuroethics Affinity Group placed a call for new ideas to be presented at the Group meeting, specifically by junior attendees. One group responded with the idea to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2. Misuse made plain: Evaluating concerns about neuroscience in national security.Kelly Lowenberg, Brenda M. Simon, Amy Burns, Libby Greismann, Jennifer M. Halbleib, Govind Persad, David L. M. Preston, Harker Rhodes & Emily R. Murphy - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):15-17.
    In this open peer commentary, we categorize the possible “neuroscience in national security” definitions of misuse of science and identify which, if any, are uniquely presented by advances in neuroscience. To define misuse, we first define what we would consider appropriate use: the application of reasonably safe and effective technology, based on valid and reliable scientific research, to serve a legitimate end. This definition presents distinct opportunities for assessing misuse: misuse is the application of invalid or unreliable science, or is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  26
    Chimeras of nurture.Judy Illes & Emily R. Murphy - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):1 – 2.