13 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Elizabeth Bates [12]Elizabeth A. Bates [1]
  1.  37
    The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing.Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2.  19
    Welcome to functionalism.Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):727-728.
  3. Functionalism and the competition model.Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney - 1989 - In Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3--73.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  4.  25
    Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study.Elizabeth Bates, Sandra McNew, Brian MacWhinney, Antonella Devescovi & Stan Smith - 1982 - Cognition 11 (3):245-299.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  5.  33
    Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals.Frederic Dick, Elizabeth Bates, Beverly Wulfeck, Jennifer Aydelott Utman, Nina Dronkers & Morton Ann Gernsbacher - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):759-788.
  6.  16
    Innateness and Emergentism.Elizabeth Bates, Jeffrey L. Elman, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 590–601.
    The nature–nurture controversy has been with us since it was first outlined by Plato and Aristotle. Nobody likes it anymore. All reasonable scholars today agree that genes and environment interact to determine complex cognitive outcomes. So why does the controversy persist? First, it persists because it has practical implications that cannot be postponed (i.e., what can we do to avoid bad outcomes and insure better ones?), a state of emergency that sometimes tempts scholars to stake out claims they cannot defend. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. Crosslinguistic studies of aphasia.Elizabeth Bates & Beverly Wulfeck - 1989 - In Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 328--371.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8. and the Development of Language.Elizabeth Bates - 2001 - In William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 134.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  17
    Bioprograms and the innateness hypothesis.Elizabeth Bates - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (2):188.
  10.  17
    Brainerd versus Aristotle with Piaget looking on.Elizabeth Bates - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):138-139.
  11.  43
    Not so fast: Domain-general factors can account for selective deficits in grammatical processing.Elizabeth Bates, Frederic Dick & Beverly Wulfeck - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):96-97.
    Normals display selective deficits in morphology and syntax under adverse processing conditions. Digit loads do not impair processing of passives and object relatives but do impair processing of grammatical morphemes. Perceptual degradation and temporal compression selectively impair several aspects of grammar, including passives and object relatives. Hence we replicate Caplan & Waters's specific findings but reach opposite conclusions, based on wider evidence.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  50
    Grodzinsky's latest stand – or, just how specific are “lesion-specific” deficits?Frederic Dick & Elizabeth Bates - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):29-29.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  17
    What Does It Mean to Claim that Something Is 'Innate'? Response to Clark, Harris, Lightfoot and Samuels.Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Kim Plunkett, Mark H. Johnson, Jeff L. Elman & Elizabeth A. Bates - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (4):588-597.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark