Highlights the central place of Greek philosophy, particularly Plato, in "Truth and Method" philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer's work, brings out differences between his thought and that of Heidegger and connects him with discussions and ...
The appearance in English of Donatella Ester Di Cesare's Utopia of Understanding: Between Babel and Auschwitz brings a distinctive development within the philosophical study of hermeneutics to an Anglophone readership.
What is the difference between hermeneutics and deconstruction? This essay provides an answer by following the guiding thread of understanding that was already brought to the fore in Paris during the "improbable debate" between Gadamer and Derrida. Maybe there was and still is a "dialogue" between the two most important currents of continental philosophy, as Derrida suggests in his talk commemorating Gadamer at Heidelberg in 2002. It is a dialogue that passes through poetry, and above all the poems of Celan. (...) In this way, the distance or the proximity between hermeneutics and deconstruction rests in the meaning of understanding: the one beginning from the uninterrupted dialogue, the other from the difference of interruption. Through a phenomenology of saying and of understanding, this essay asks at the same time how the differences of deconstruction are the stars necessary for the constellation of hermeneutics, and how the constellation is nevertheless necessary for every new star. It is perhaps the Schibboleth of Celan that indicates the point of orientation. (shrink)
El artículo describe el horizonte apocalíptico de la filosofía de la historia contenidaen los Cuadernos negros de Heidegger. Ser-para-la-muerte, el gran tema de Ser yTiempo, se transfiere a la historia, donde Heidegger mira hacia el final. Esta es unade las grandes novedades de los Cuadernos negros, donde el tema de la revoluciónsiempre ha sido concebido en términos demasiado metafísicos, como un simple giro,no como un acontecimiento, mientras surgen interesantes reflexiones sobre el comunismo.
In questo saggio viene esaminato il pensiero politico di Humboldt, di solito preso erroneamente per un liberalismo. Il suo congedo dallo Stato segna una riflessione critica che si interroga non sull'origine, bensě sul fine dello Stato, e ha una dimensione manifestamente an-archica. Privo di fondamento, lo Stato č solo un male temporaneo che puň essere tollerato se si costruisce la «comunitÀ» che Humboldt delinea sul modello della lingua. Perché č nella reciprocitÀ dei parlanti, delineata soprattutto nello studio Sul duale, che (...) si puň trovare una via d'uscita alla opposizione tra universale e individuale. Mentre dischiude lo spazio del dialogo, la lingua indica una comunitÀ che č non meccanica, bensě organica. (shrink)
