6 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Diamondstone [5]David E. Diamondstone [1]
  1.  20
    Low upper bounds in the LR degrees.David Diamondstone - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (3):314-320.
  2.  38
    Π 1 0 Classes, Peano Arithmetic, Randomness, and Computable Domination.David E. Diamondstone, Damir D. Dzhafarov & Robert I. Soare - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):127-159.
    We present an overview of the topics in the title and of some of the key results pertaining to them. These have historically been topics of interest in computability theory and continue to be a rich source of problems and ideas. In particular, we draw attention to the links and connections between these topics and explore their significance to modern research in the field.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  36
    Promptness Does Not Imply Superlow Cuppability.David Diamondstone - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1264 - 1272.
    A classical theorem in computability is that every promptly simple set can be cupped in the Turing degrees to some complete set by a low c.e. set. A related question due to A. Nies is whether every promptly simple set can be cupped by a superlow c.e. set, i. e. one whose Turing jump is truth-table reducible to the halting problem θ'. A negative answer to this question is provided by giving an explicit construction of a promptly simple set that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Martin-Löf randomness and Galton–Watson processes.David Diamondstone & Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (5):519-529.
  5.  10
    Lowness for Difference Tests.David Diamondstone & Johanna N. Y. Franklin - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (1):63-73.
  6.  36
    Strengthening prompt simplicity.David Diamondstone & Keng Meng Ng - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (3):946 - 972.
    We introduce a natural strengthening of prompt simplicity which we call strong promptness, and study its relationship with existing lowness classes. This notion provides a ≤ wtt version of superlow cuppability. We show that every strongly prompt c.e. set is superlow cuppable. Unfortunately, strong promptness is not a Turing degree notion, and so cannot characterize the sets which are superlow cuppable. However, it is a wtt-degree notion, and we show that it characterizes the degrees which satisfy a wtt-degree notion very (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark